I think what you say has merit. We certainly have people from all over. If they’re not a threat to town, though, and they’re good… maybe we can label them townish and still be able to use the reveals? I mean, good folk are generally trying to do the right thing.
How long have people had to wait for role change PMs? I finally decided to try a soldier alternative (there were lots of archers apparently so I thought I’d try berserker! - Also because people are attacking me and I hope it will give me a chance at defence)
I read neutral as being a throw away term. Wanted it clarified
since you can be law neutral and/or moral neutral
Which I note ** gnarly charlie ** claims to both be
so are we deducing that he has a different win/con than moral aligned good? *
no wonder the Mod takes a bit to give results.
colour me confused.
on point though. Since We can change either alignment by actions/deeds there is a low chance that a Townie can become Scum ( since they could become Town again and have Scum knowledge) right?
There is something else in play here.
From the rules
Yes, and temptation is never far from reach. The way I read my offer was that attacking - even the demon, apparently - can give one the choice of heading toward the dark side.
I think that someone who went to evil and started to try to come back again might draw Pizza’s attention though - it’s a bit of obvious game breaking.
Also, being evil, while probably being inherently anti-town, wouldn’t necessarily put you in a team/faction.
… My only night action is sleep. I have a day attack/protect. I’m not even interested in attacking you anymore, you’ve dropped off my list of people that I think are scum.
I think, until evidence is produced otherwise, that a blue Good deathflip means townie and a red Evil means scum. So one scum, Weedy has been killed and the rest have been town or third party.
4 deaths in one night, that’s not good. Funny that Mahaloth didn’t try and catch up here.** Gaderene**'s death is the one that really bothers me. I can’t understand why he would be a scum kill, he was getting a lot of flack anyway and there were a few people that wanted to lynch him so why would scum waste a NK on him?
Vote Visorslash
He has readily admitted to attacking people willy nilly yet he didn’t vote to lynch anyone, even if he’s 3rd Party I think Town would be better off without him.
That didn’t look like an ordinary night kill to me - they seem to be dealt by the big guy.
I assumed it was a vigilante or someone who’s reached some kind of assassin goal.
Suburban was pinging me already Yesterday with grabbing things people said, ignoring their context, and pushing them separately. (e.g. the bit with Silver Jan’s vote change after checking her facts). It smelled of stirring up trouble in the town, enough to vote him.
Add to that the fact that Gadarene has been at him every day & got assassinated.
I don’t like losing a power role, someone with tracking skills even, from town. I am looking at Gadarene’s apparent hysteria from a different angle.
Any townie voting for Visorslash should recall his state of being down a solid 500 hp and organize a vig posse instead. His would very nearly be a wasted lynch, since by this point probably another 3 or 4 hits would finish him off.
I’d appreciate this comment a bit more if it were better sourced and explained in more detail exactly what your examples are and how they speak of just stirring up trouble.
Tracking skills? What tracking skills?
Regardless and assuming both that you’re right and that it’s something a diligent scum team would be on top of, what do you think of the idea that that would be reason enough for scum to kill Gadarene by itself, independent of anything to do with Suburban Plankton? You’re using this as support for your vote against SP, but it actually detracts from one of your other points.
Finally – why are you assumign that Gadarene’s death was not a vig?
Oh, and I don’t know what you mean by your final sentence.
Wait I just read your previous post that Gadarene’s killer you ARE assuming was a vig or someone with an independent goal. Yet you’re still voting SP on the theory that SP may have been the killer?