Mafia Reunion Day 4

[DiggitCamara]

@GuiriEnEspana

(snip)
@Diggit #693, I guess there’s a chance a reveal would show “hostile” or “non-hostile” - we’re usually informed if a player is PFK but it would semi-confirm the rest of the group, which is unlikely. “YOU WIN if at any checkpoint (Dawn or Dusk) all 14 Scum players (Wolves + Mafia) are dead.”

(snip)
I think Diggit is a good option today
D1#249 Diggit is 8th on Colby, no mention of Toejam on 5 votes
D1#264 Switches to snfaulkner for commenting on Colby’s meta
D1#282 Asks for proof of colby’s meta
D1#393 To Drain, explains why voted snf due to defense
D1#747 To Normal, denies seeing the train on Colby, reiterates reason for SNF vote
D2#230 To Johnny Bravo, is pinged by comments about scum not knowing who to defend, suggests they slightly defend all non-scum, revotes snf
D2#250 fixes vote color
D2#255 mini-Wow on snf, lots of fluff
D2#547 Comments on flaws in Paul’s plan for a VT claim
D2#552 Maybe there’s something to the delay in brewha’s switch, asks other holders
D2#558 Switches to Crys, does not believe there are two masonic groups
D2#596 Seems to think Crys is claiming to be on town’s side, not 3rd party? As if she’s counter-claiming the masons?
D2#606 Argues to get rid of 3rd parties, who knows what powers they could have or get
D2#816/820 Didn’t notice Lakai subbed back in
D3#368 Maybe Sario prevented an NK, wonders why people are not paranoid about the cult. Suggests that revealing the other switchholder would prove cultists are hostile?
D3#400 Finds cultist description fishy, concerned what happens once the re-group
D3#519 votes Thing Fish for list of town leans without reasoning
D3#695 Realises his mistake in #368, Crys has a scum switch
D3#691 fixes vote color again
D3#693 wants a cultist to die, considers wolves false-claiming scum
D3#695 does not trust people who say they think other players are town - does not mention other lean listers
D3#698 Continues surmises about crys as wolf, but no vote anymore? "Food for thought"His participation is light but looks OK, maybe a heavy focus on the 3rd parties, lots of confusion - missing Lakai subbing in, formatting votes, mistakes - a sign that he’s putting on a show maybe, I disagree with his stance on leans - especially in this game since no-one except the masons could really know that another player is town, but it’s his votes, from SNF for town leans, to Crys for 3rd party, then to Thing Fish for town leans (why is SNF good now?) and still coming up with plenty of reasons why he should still be voting Crys or Sach, feels forced to me, like he’s keeping up appearances.
(snip)

@DiggitCamara

First of all, thanks to Total Lost for reminding me to answer this post.

There isn’t actually a lot for me to respond. The points Guiri makes are mostly valid, though I believe I have explained that my stance on leans during this game is actually GOOD for town.

1. Both scum teams know they don’t know who is town fer sure
2. Both scum teams know Town knows point 1
3. This makes town relax as to declaring someone “town” (hey, I don’t actually know fer sure!)
4. But they will (probably) make this proclamations concerning someone who isn’t on their team

Point 3 and 4 are important. Since Scum aren’t as wary as they have been in other games, they WILL and HAVE declared someone to be town without qualms. Witness both Thing Fish and jsgoddess doing it… jgoddess even defended Thing Fish ferchrissakes!

And that’s why I focus on some of these posts.

However, my playing philosophy is currently:

1. State my case
2. Hope it is accepted by town and or revised
3. Not fixate on it

I still believe we have to do SOMETHING about the LUTHA cult. I also believe snfaulkner is very probably scum. But since no one else has backed me on that regard, I won’t fixate on the accusation.

I am re-posting this because in my original answer to Guiri’s points during YesterNight I messed up the quoting and it seemed like Lakai had made this point .