[QUOTE=Diomedes]
Sorry, Rugger. You’re lying.
You’ve got the offsite discussion board correct, but the whole idea of a mason discussion board doesn’t make sense in the slightest. We’re looking at four masons, right? What if two different sets of masons had found each other, would Pleo have set up two separate boards for those masons? Doesn’t make sense to me.
I do like the fact that someone registered a new account right before you posted this on the board as “masonzeta”. I appreciate the extra bit of effort.
Now, obviously, Santo knows that the witches would be able to pick this claim apart. It strongly lends credence to the idea that he’s a Wolf or Cabalist, the two other groups other than the witches who would know the location of Pleo’s offsite board. Is it possible that a Necro might get access to this board? Did the nondiscussing roles (sache?) get the address for the discussion board, even ifthey couldn’t post on it?
[/QUOTE]
It’s in both of our team’s best interest to talk about this Tomorrow.
[QUOTE=DiggitCamara]
Your wish is my command
[/QUOTE]
Diggit’s mostly cleared in my book. He included the line “Please PM or email me your target before the end of each Day.” He had a secret role which differentiated him from the other Masons. Santo’s secret role would have had to be the secret role of all the masons, but Pleo seems to have set this game up with each player having an individual,specialized role. If nothing else, Diggit seems to have done his homework when creating his false claim.
I was considering him. I just am considering Zoggie as a more likely necro right now. Santo’s false claim does point to him being a wolf, anyways.
[QUOTE=Santo Rugger]
It’s in both of our team’s best interest to talk about this Tomorrow.
[/QUOTE]
That’s just yucky.
On the plus side, Santo Rugger is claiming non-Town.
But just when I’m convinced that Santo Rugger can’t be the Necromancer, now I think he is. Why would Santo Rugger want to discuss it Tomorrow? Why the delay?
One player benefits the most from delaying discussion to Tomorrow, The Necromancer, because there isn’t a tomorrow.
[QUOTE=sachertorte]
I’m fine with risks. I was just curious as to why so many were simultaneously suspicious of Santo Rugger, yet not considering him for lynch Today.
[/QUOTE]
You yourself made that point. It’s lynch necromancer time, and it seems unlikely that Rugger is the necromancer. It seems likelier (to me at least) for the Omega Wolf to claim freemasonhood as long as there were no other masons left alive.
Funny. I do have access.
I only see posts by Pleonast, on two topics. One thread’s last post is on Nov 2, 2007, 11:01am, it’s named “Player List and Vote Counts” and has pretty much the information about Players and Vote Counts (Thread Started on Oct 1, 2007, 6:22am ).
The other one has the rules about the game. (four posts, last one Sept 19, 2007, 12:27pm )
[QUOTE=Santo Rugger]
It’s in both of our team’s best interest to talk about this Tomorrow.
[/QUOTE]
You’re admitting to being a wolf? Trying to call it a draw? Or that last Cabalist, and wanting to see if we can team up long enough for Blaster or I to snuff it?
if you’re alive tomorrow, I think that pretty much tells us who the wolves are: You and Hazel. If you’re dead, your furry buddy ShadowFacts will be joining you up on boot hill.
[QUOTE=sachertorte]
That’s just yucky.
On the plus side, Santo Rugger is claiming non-Town.
But just when I’m convinced that Santo Rugger can’t be the Necromancer, now I think he is. Why would Santo Rugger want to discuss it Tomorrow? Why the delay?
One player benefits the most from delaying discussion to Tomorrow, The Necromancer, because there isn’t a tomorrow.
[/QUOTE]
Because if we lynch me today, both our sides could lose tonight. I don’t want to limit discussion today, but I do want to find the Necro.
[QUOTE=Diomedes]
You’re admitting to being a wolf? Trying to call it a draw? Or that last Cabalist, and wanting to see if we can team up long enough for Blaster or I to snuff it?
if you’re alive tomorrow, I think that pretty much tells us who the wolves are: You and Hazel. If you’re dead, your furry buddy ShadowFacts will be joining you up on boot hill.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DiggitCamara]
You yourself made that point. It’s lynch necromancer time, and it seems unlikely that Rugger is the necromancer. It seems likelier (to me at least) for the Omega Wolf to claim freemasonhood as long as there were no other masons left alive.
Funny. I do have access.
I only see posts by Pleonast, on two topics. One thread’s last post is on Nov 2, 2007, 11:01am, it’s named “Player List and Vote Counts” and has pretty much the information about Players and Vote Counts (Thread Started on Oct 1, 2007, 6:22am ).
The other one has the rules about the game. (four posts, last one Sept 19, 2007, 12:27pm )
[/QUOTE]
I saw your name on the offboard site, along with the names of a handful of other players, some of whom would normally have access to the board, and some who wouldn’t. I figured Pleo added those accounts to throw the trail off of nosy parkers like me who checked the ‘members’ list. (I did it to send a snarky anonymous note to one of the Cabalists just before the game started)
Curious that you would get access but sache didn’t, though… anyone else know of the location of the offsite board that wouldn’t normally have reason to?
[QUOTE=sachertorte]
Access to what? And why do you have access to it?
[/QUOTE]
There’s an offsite board that has the discussion fora for the witches, wolves and cabalists.
[QUOTE=sachertorte]
That’s just yucky.
On the plus side, Santo Rugger is claiming non-Town.
But just when I’m convinced that Santo Rugger can’t be the Necromancer, now I think he is. Why would Santo Rugger want to discuss it Tomorrow? Why the delay?
One player benefits the most from delaying discussion to Tomorrow, The Necromancer, because there isn’t a tomorrow.
[/QUOTE]
To me there are two issues with Santo Rugger’s board:
Knowledge of the board’s existance and location
Access to the board
I did not have knowledge of the board’s existence until Santo Rugger’s recent post.
I do not believe I have access to the board. When I go to the location, there is a page asking me to login or create an account. I have not tried either.
Why do I have access? Dunno. I was in other games on that board, maybe that’s why I have access? (I often let my browser store my access credentials to boards so I don’t have to type name and password. In this case those fields appeared pre-filled).
The point is moot, though. The falsity of Rugger’s claim is out in the open now.
(BTW, Santos, do you think your perpetual scummyhood is:
if you’re alive tomorrow, I think that pretty much tells us who the wolves are: You and Hazel. If you’re dead, your furry buddy ShadowFacts will be joining you up on boot hill.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=sachertorte]
Okay, I need things spelled out slowly.
To me there are two issues with Santo Rugger’s board:
Knowledge of the board’s existance and location
Access to the board
I did not have knowledge of the board’s existence until Santo Rugger’s recent post.
I do not believe I have access to the board. When I go to the location, there is a page asking me to login or create an account. I have not tried either.
[/QUOTE]
I’m sure if you create an account, you’ll be able to see the basic information Diggit referred to.
Actually, now that I check on it, Pleo’s sig has a link to the secret board, if you click on the ‘Mirror’, you’ll be redirected to the main page of it.
I’m now leaning towards drinking the Wine in Front of Santo.
