Ok I’ve seen the trailers, I read the reviews and I can not wait untill it comes out.
Should we be expecting something completely above and beyond the wonders of the first one, or are we going to be disappointed?
I doubt the latter, I just want to know what to expect!!
Pulling hair out
Expectations are very very high. Easily comparable to FOTR or Episode 1. It is my hope that we’re going to see more of the former than the latter.
I recently rewatched the original and I’d have to say that what made it work, above and beyond the spectacular visuals, was a kind of haunting mood, almost every frame was foreboding and strange.
Everything I read about “Reloaded”, though, is about the action setpieces, the innovations, the ass-kicking. Yes I like ass-kicking but please please give me something to hang it on.
Anyone seen the latest commercial?
Even though it’s a commercial, I’ll spoiler box it:
[spoiler] At the end, one agent Smith says to Morpheus, “If you can’t beat us…” and then another Smith comes around the corner and says, “Join us!”
They have Morpheus pinned and it looks like one of them is going to punch into him and turn him into a Smith(like we’ve seen him do in the trailers).
I hope Morpheus survives at least into the third movie! [/spoiler]
It will surpass the original in every way. Well, every way except not being all about the action. 
Well I have just watched the 94 megabyte trailer. Judging by that I estimate that it will be twenty-seven times better than the first one.
I’m not expecting it be as great as the first, mostly because when I saw the Matrix on it’s first weekend I was in such a glorious daze because I had never seen anything like it before.
But by now we’ve all seen bullet-time and I’ve watched Twin Warriors and Fist of Legend, and have therefore seen the best wire-fu can offer. So I don’t think Reloaded will be able to impress me.
I have higher hopes for Revolutions. I heard most of it is set outside the Matrix, so I like to imagine it is what Termanator 3 should have been: Future war, robots vs man.
Eternal: Reloaded’s effects will still be cutting edge. Think ten-minute fight scenes that are entirely computer-generated, but indistinguishable from the real actors and locations.
I can say this with 100% certainty right now: No, it won’t. At any rate, that’s not really a merit in and of itself. Whose to say that will actually be interesting?
I should clarify: The graphics may be cutting-edge, but I’m sure they won’t have any prolonged fight scenes featuring convincing digital replicas of people.
Okay, May 15 is not far off. I can handle that. Opening night is on the menu.
Raise your hand if you can’t wait for NOVEMBER to come around!!! <raises hand and bounces up and down in chair>
A Matrix movie plot that is based OUTSIDE of the matrix sounds very cool.
I wish that Aaliyah was still here. My husband and I so desperately wanted to see her in it…
This Wired article says otherwise:
http://www.thehotbutton.com/today/hot.button/index.html
This guy has a really well written review of the movie.
I’d say it is mostly spoiler free, with at most some minor spoilers. He loves the movies, but is grounded.
He mentions that it is unfathomable that both the Lord of the Rings and the Matrix trilogies will have their climax within about a month of each other. It is a great time to be a movie fan.
I think Eternal’s key point is convincing. Digital setpieces are becoming common and I’m still skeptical if I’ll be fooled into thinking a digital stuntman isn’t. Still, I’m gonna do my best to keep an open mind cause I’d like to see it pulled off :).
I think if you overanalyze it, you will be able to tell the fake setpieces and the fake “digital actors”. But it will still probably be better than actual stuntmen, who you can always spot if you overanalyze.
Really? How do you know? You know the fight scene in the trailer between Neo and about 100 Agent Smiths? Can you pick out which ones are real and which ones are digital?
I can tell you that everyone that’s seen the trailer with me says the bit where he ducks and his coat is flying out behind him in ultra slow motion looks fake.
Honestly I’m not trying to bash the movie at all – I haven’t seen anything other than the trailer. I’m merely hoping that there’s not a repeat of Spider-man where the action sequences with the digital people looked really out of place since they were no where near as real as the special effects people seemed to have thought.
I know what you’re saying, but this always seemed silly to me, pointing to something that can’t happen and saying that’s not what it really looks like. Bullet-time pans in general look fake because we never see it, so we can’t possibly interpret it as looking right.
No, no, they’re saying the way his coat flows out behind him looks fake.
Depending on how they do it unrealistic acts look real even when they’re not – I couldn’t fool myself into thinking that it was anything but a bunch of polygons swinging through New York but damn if that bit at the end of the Matrix trailer with him flying out of the castle doesn’t look cool :).