Yeah. While I definitely don’t deny that some left-wing activists like Michael Moore also promote highly partisan viewpoints, I think the OP may have failed to grasp the specific irony of praising Michael Savage for decrying “loss of social cohesion” when Savage himself is one of the most aggressively partisan and divisive pundits out there.
Even if you believe Savage is right about some other things, how can you admire his views on “loss of social cohesion” when they so clearly indicate that he’s either got his head way up his ass or is a raging hypocrite, or both? It’d be like praising Donald Trump for criticizing the tendency of public figures to tell too many lies.
Absolutely. It is only through sense of belonging, trust, strength and bond of honor that the glorious American republic will rise up to overthrow the chains of bourgeois capitalism! All power to the United States. Peace to the People. Land to the peasants.
Can I just note your grammar is really coming along nicely. Have you been practising?
Well, for starters, not constantly spouting a bunch of crazy nonsense about nearly any given subject.
The man is a homeopath who supports Donald Trump and denies climate change (I wrote this one before even bothering to check if it was true, because this is basically every republican pundit, and yes, I’m right). That’s three strikes on the “crazy nonsense” scorecard.
Has anyone heard anything about an upcoming grit shortage? I hear China’s gonna cut their exports.
Thank God we have President Trump, I’m certain that Hillary would have sold America’s gumption mines to the Russians!
America has long been proud of having no such thing. Immigrant communities have much more social cohesion (in some cases, forced by the rejection from the not-so-receiving country) than Standard Americans, and these more than Mythological Americans.
Sorry, some of those durn librul spies got hold of a few of the Seekrit Decoder Rings. They were able to translate Mr. Weiner’s usage of the term “social cohesion” into standard English.
The explanation for how these principles result in undying devotion to the golf-cart-borne physical embodiment of the Seven Deadly Sins known as Napoleon Boneyspurs ought to be most interesting…
First and foremost, an intelligent person knows the limit of their own knowledge.
Savage is just another self-proclaimed “smartest guy in any room” who believes the stupidest shit because he thinks if a “smart” guy like him believes it, it must be true.
Assume a matter-antimatter explosion. 1 gram of antimatter has a explosive yield of 40 kilotons of TNT. Taking a mass of 75 kg (as only the lighter of the two will undergo a full reaction), that’s 40,000 tons X 75,000 grams = 3,000,000,000 tons, or 3 gigatons of TNT.
I’m not going to get into this Savage guy’s philosophical rhetoric, which I assume is the usual right wing bullshit shit sandwich nonsense that his stupid listeners eat up with a grin
I’ll just say that I have a PhD. I know literally thousands (and I mean literally, not figuratively) of other people who have PhDs in a dizzying array of academic fields.
Some of them are goddam morons. Most are at least competent in their areas of expertise (but not all!), but having a narrow area of knowledge does not make you intelligent.
You don’t have to be that smart to get a PhD. You just need to be very persistent.