It can be problematic for other reasons. Jensen didn’t have a very good year and that’s probably the biggest problem. There is also the way he has been used. Jensen made 69 appearances this season and only seven were for more than one inning. Only once was he asked to get six outs, and none of his appearances in August and September were more than one inning.
Basically, he pitched the ninth and only then ninth all year. Now he is asked to go two every night. Subconsciously or not, he will pace himself. He can’t just lay it all out in the first inning. This backfires fairly regularly in the postseason with closers.
My sister and one of my favorite YouTube personalities (Bob “Moviebob” Chipman) live in Boston…and that was the extent of my rooting interest. They’re both great people, so hey, works for me.
Wow. 4 World Series championships in a span of 14 seasons. If any other franchise that had a run like that, I’d consider it one step shy of a rampaging juggernaut. In the case of the Red Sox, however, it seems like the universe is simply righting itself. Just a couple more before we get to the number they should have had over those 86 years. Pardon, 100.
The biggest memory I’ll take from this will be the stadium erupting into cheers after the final out. Swear to god, I looked around and thought “Wait a minute, this can’t be Shea, the entire outfield wall is the same height.” Imagine being a Dodger, or even a fan, in there and hearing that. Had to be withering.
Aaaand, someone just launched a very loud f-bomb on ESPN. Since it had nothing to do with sex, I’m okay with it.
Well, for six months of the regular season, the Red Sox basically squashed the rest of the league like a bug. Then, in the playoffs, they … squashed the rest of league like a bug. What were they, something like 11-3 versus the 100 win Yankees, the 103 win Astros, and the red hot Dodgers?
I’ve run out of superlatives for that team, I truly have.
I thought Pearce was the correct choice for MVP. He had the highest WPA in the series (0.63) which works pretty good as an indicator in a short series of who really was most valuable. Price would have been a decent choice too.
By WPA, the Most Valuable Most Valuable Player in a World Series in the live ball era is Jack Morris in 1991, at 1.26.
You could probably construct a version of WPA that measures the shift in probability of winning the series, rather than each individual game; Morris would probably do even better in that measure.