I think a larger perspective is needed. As early as 1900, doctors understood the link between feeding babies cow’s milk and malnutrition or death from diarrhea. In 1910, there were 2 different campaigns directed at mothers: one of them promoting breastfeeding, and one of them promoting cleaner cow’s milk for babies. By the 1930’s, the cleaner cow’s milk campaign had won, ensuring pasteurized milk and safe ice-box handling for milk at home. Breastfeeding fell out of favor.
By 1971, only 24% of women nursed their babies even once. Early weaning and cow milk or formula supplementation were ubiquitous.
During the seventies and eighties, breastfeeding rates waxed and waned, due to social movements more than anything else. There were some areas of the country where granola crunchy hippie mothering, breastfeeding included was the norm, but only among white, college educated women. In most of the country, formula was still prefered. Of course, as formulas got better and better nutritionally, it became less of a hot button issue. Still, the medical community found new compounds in breast milk and new benefits to breastfeeding all the time.
Not until 2001, in response to campaigns aimed at black urban mothers on WIC and other similar programs, as well as well-publicized information about the health benefits - everything from increase in IQ to decrease in asthma and obesity - did breastfeeding hit a new high of 69.5% of mothers trying it at least once.
So the pendulum has swung from breastmilk to formula to breastmilk and is now somewhere in the middle of the two. There are still those out there who are so aware of the nutritional and emotional benefits of breastmilk (which are very, very real) that they, like any zealots, are out to convert others by any means necessary. They may be misguided or bitchy, but they’re not wrong: 99% of the time, breastmilk is best. Of course, that isn’t helpful information is you can’t fit it into your life, for whatever reason.
I’ll admit I get really annoyed at people who refuse to breastfeed because it’s “icky” or “inconvenient”. (I recognize that the OP is NOT saying either of these, but I have heard them from others and suspect so have the rabid message board women.) Those, in my personal ethics, are not good enough reasons to deprive a child of very important health and emotional benefits.
I also wanted so badly to breastfeed both of mine, and couldn’t, so there’s a lot of personal sour grapes in it for me. I recognize that. I spent 15 months pumping because my nipples are too large for a proper latch, and was only able to pump half her supply. I don’t view that as extraordinary, I view that as the minimum I could do for my daughter. Honestly, I feel guilty I didn’t pump for two full years. I’d watch my friend’s nurse and feel very jealous indeed. I can’t fathom not wanting that experience.
However, the more rational part of me realizes that people have to do what they think is right for them. Even if it’s for a reason that isn’t good enough for me. I’m not about to mandate breastfeeding, but I will encourage it at every opportunity. That may include expressing my disappointment in those who won’t even try, but in the end, I support every woman’s right to choose how to feed her baby.
[QUOTE=Elza B]
What the heck? Yes, we all know the health benefits of breastfeeding, but is your kid really going to come to you at age 25 and say “Gee, Mom, thanks for breastfeeding me!”?
[/QUOTE]
Well, perhaps, if they are well informed. I’ve certainly talked about it with my mother, and am very grateful that she nursed me. I’m the only person in our family with zero allergies or asthma, and I can’t think why not, if not for the milk. I’m also very intelligent and was never sick as an infant. I had two ear infections ever. Unfortunately, I am obese, so I didn’t get that benefit, but overall, nursing served me well! Those experiences certainly weighed on my decision to pump for my daughter.
All of the historical information in this post can be found in this excellent article.