If you think threatening me is going to get you an answer faster, you obviously haven’t played enough games with me. I have not decided what I will be doing. We are, in case you haven’t noticed, in the midst of a rather significant discussion, and the outcome of that discussion will inform on my action.
If we are I’m not part of that we. We can always deal with Zuma later if he really isn’t playing. Maybe we can confirm him as townie by one of our detectives. Force the scum to deal with him.
vote zuma
What exactly is the advance of voting lynching Zuma, if we are going to lynch Blaster anyway?
It’s not a threat, it’s just a statement. If tomorrow someone says, “Well tdpats caused confusion” I’m just going to ignore them, and the reason is that I’ve been the one pushing for a decision.
You are in the midst of a conversation that involves participation. I consider forcing me to dangle in the wind while I might, you know, have RL stuff to do, to be extremely irritating. Whatever decisions you have to make, you are running out of time to make them.
zuma is on my investigate list, but a Ranger’s power lowers the probability of my investigating successfully.
I would if I could, but I can’t.
There. Now. Nobody vote. Let’s discuss this like rational people, and when we reach some kind of collective decision, I commit to unvoting to conform with the collective will.
The alternative is comical and stupid flipping of votes for the next 20 minutes. We now have a tie; let’s go from here.
My preference is to lynch both. I stated as such quite a while ago (yesterday?). I was open to lynching Blaster Master with Squid stabbing zuma, but my preference is the Tie.
But that is half the fun.
Really though I don’t see how leaving Zuma alive can hurt us. We can lynch him any future day, and use him to test our detectives. We will get additional information on people, and perhaps force the scum to use a kill rather than us.
I’m not forcing you to do anything, dude. I intend to pass you the Helm unless something happens to change that in the next twenty minutes. I will announce any intention to do anything other than pass the Helm publicly. OK?
What is your feeling about sach’s idea (we fry Blam but leave Boozahol to use up his kill on zuma)?
And I’m Accepting Item. But I have stuff to do so I have to leave, well now-ish.
If you plan on lynching zuma on a future day, I have No Intention of investigating him.
- I have a higher likelihood of failure
- You’re going to kill him anyway
Oh, and it’s a stupid test anyway. Evil already knows zuma’s alignment.
We lynch him on a future day if he comes up Evil. If he comes up good and you come up good than we don’t have to do anything.
What item is he carrying?
He won’t tell us. We won’t know if someone steals it, so it could wind up in the hands of an evil character, and we wouldn’t know.
By KOing him now we get the item into the hoard, or if no item appears know that someone lifted it today.
And it’s not as if we’re giving up on killing BlaM by forcing a tie.
sach and hawk, your positions are clear. Is there anyone else present who would like to weigh in on whether we should lynch Blam, zuma, both, or neither?
It is still townies using a kill that might not be necessary. If Zuma is town, I don’t want to the scum’s work for them.
Holy cow, I refresh and there is two new pages of Blam shitstorm! I wish I didn’t have meetings on Fridays. I’m happy with my votes where they are right now, and I will leave them both to avoid any last minute confusion.
Boozahol is a Townie?