…on the off chance that Fenris gets back to the thread…
Have you considered simply discussing the difference between a theory and a dogma? We are assuming from what you wrote here that the lad is sentient.
The major difference is that a theory is ‘falsifyable’. That is, there is a set of conditions or results that can, should they occur, prove the theory to be false. A dogma, on the other hand, has no falsifying conditions or results. All negative evidence is either ignored or co-opted.
For instance:
Gravity. Theory thereof… Objects attract, etc. etc.
Nutty Theory: I don’t believe that gravity exists.
Experiment: Jump off a building.
Result: Road Hamburger due to deceleration trauma.
Experiment: Do this a million times.
Result: Please, my stomach. Large cleanup for someone. Also, large religious issues due to resurection.
However: Should you not fall, or fall at a rate not consistent with the acceleration due to gravity where ever you happen to be, or fall with a large horizontal delta V, or whatever, then we need to rethink the theory of gravity. The theory, or part of it, has been falsified.
On the other hand, a dogma says that there is something else happening. Gravity doesn’t really work, it’s a government conspiracy. Government agents with laser beams causing a field of dampened inertia or some such caused the body to fall to the ground. They simply explain away or refuse to consider all contrary evidence.
He probably won’t get it soon, but, If he is sentient, at some point he may actually start thinking. Worked on my 13 year old and several of his friends, should work on a 19 year old.
P.S. if anyone can come up with a better or funnier example, love to hear it.
P.P.S. By the way, exactly what does this young gentleman think has to be done to the gasoline in the 200mpg carburetor to get to 200mpg? I don’t think you can do much more then burn all of it unless he goes “New-QUE-lar”.