Posts about moderation go in this forum, right?
Kinthalis makes a post about PC-specific features they’re adding to Skyrim to take advantage of the greater technical capability of the PC. He’s not saying HAHA EAT IT CONSOLE GAMERS, he’s simply happy to hear that the game he’s been looking forward to will make effort to give him more features.
Bosstone can’t stand this and makes what is a ridiculously feeble attempt to say “oh yeah, well our side gets this!”. He also deliberately notes that he’s being a douche in that post - his words, not mine.
Bosstone then makes a post in which he admits he was attempting to start a “tit-for-tat” argument about console and tells people to stop whining - which I guess isn’t rude because there are smilies in the post.
I see the fundamental misunderstanding at this point. To him, he thinks this is a PC vs console argument similar to stupid shit like ford vs chevy or xbox 360 vs ps3 - stuff where people get needlessly partisan about products that are almost identical. So if Kinthalis is happy that he’s going to get a better game than he expects, Bosstone thinks his side has been attacked and has to retaliate.
What he fundamentally doesn’t understand that PC vs console for PC gamers isn’t a ford vs chevy type pissing match. It’s more of a “how are you going to make my experience worse so that it can be viable on console” - we’re only concerned with it as far as it hampers our experience. I made a posttrying to explain that.
I didn’t personally insult Bosstone in that post, and I was actually in a way attempting to defuse an argument by explaining that the argument isn’t over what he thinks it is.
Now - I would be ok if the moderating objection was that I was hijacking the thread too much. But if that were the case, why wouldn’t the guy who admitted he was attempting to start a tit-for-tat argument also receive blame? After all, he was the first one who attempted to derail the thread, my post was only a response to that.
If it was for the insults in my posts, could you specify what insults were over the line? My post was passionate and bitter at a large segment of the population (in much the same way people might grumble over how good shows get cancelled while reality TV drek is everywhere because the viewing public are idiots), but I don’t feel that I personally insulted him.
I will add that after I was forbidden from discussing the subject further, he posted a response full of factually incorrect statements that I was no longer allowed to respond to - I would suggest that he likely did this deliberately.
I get it. I have a perception around here as a pc/console instigator. But I am not the instigator in this scenario, nor did I throw around personal insults. I think my passion on the issue makes it seem more like I’m an instigator than I actually am. I pass up opportunities to take snipes on the issue all the time, and the only time I bring it up is typically in response to something someone else said, or if I’m specifically starting a discussion about the failings of a game due to its multiplatform nature (for instance my thread on modern warfare 2). I almost never bring up the issue simply to bash other posters or score points. I’m far less guilty than LOUNE in this regard for example, yet I rarely see him getting moderated for his completely blatant snipes.
Bosstone in this instance is more to blame than I am for any hijacking, yet I was the only one singled out for moderation.