My October Movieline Column SUCKS . . .

Pay no attention to it—once again, my goddam editor used “Humor-B-Gone” on it and removed any unsightly trace of wit.

I just E’d her and told her if she thinks she’s so goddam funny, SHE can write the column—I mean, you’d think after eight years, they’d give my some leeway! I need the money and the exposure, but not badly enough to have my name attached to something that’s downright embarrassing . . .

So any of you who get Movieline, please rip out page 93 before reading . . . Did Dorothy Parker have to put up with this crap from Vanity Fair?

HIJACK

Hey Eve, did you see this:

But the very next day, as Lieberman uttered similar sentiments to clergy in Chicago, he received a response from the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. It wasn’t applause from the amen corner. The ADL objected to Lieberman’s insistence that “as a people, we need to reaffirm our faith and renew the dedication of our nation and ourselves to God and God’s purpose.”

This appeal to “belief in God,” the organization argued, is contrary to the First Amendment and to “the American ideal.” Nor did the organization agree with the senator’s belief that “morality cannot be maintained without religion.” American atheists, the ADL declared, “should not be made to feel inferior, or left out of the [political] process.”

In response, Lieberman agreed that an atheist could be a good president. But the irony was as evident as it was jarring. Here was a Jewish watchdog group criticizing one of its own for expressing his religious convictions—and exercising his freedom of speech. In the ADL’s view, “public profession of religious beliefs should not be an elemental part of this or any other campaign.” Translation: “Shut up already.”

from

Eissclam

Yeah, that was mentioned in my Joe Lieberman thread in the Pit—can I get the Anti-Defamation League to tell my Movieline editor to keep her goddam hands off my column, now?

Hey, am I mentioned in it? I’ll run out and buy a copy if I’m mentioned in it…

Now, back to our regularly scheduled Leiberman discussion. Mazel tov.

Sorry for the redundancy.

I don’t read Movieline, but I’m sure that if your editor omitted the same class of wit that is apparent in your posts here, your readers are the worse for it.

I’ve had some of my writing edited with a heavy hand (and critiqued with an even heavier one) so I empathize with your feelings.

Eissclam.

Aw, c’mon, Eve - you KNOW it’s a power thing… I used to have to draft memos for a man who’d change commas - JUST BECAUSE HE COULD! No one in the office ever did figure out how determined whether a comma was needed or not, so it HAD to be a power thing. How else can authority figures justify their inflated paychecks?!?

oh, sorry, that was prolly a bit uncalledfor. I’ll just sit here quietly for a while and think about what I’ve said. Pardon me.

<sigh>

Makes me glad I put absolutely no personal investment in any of my work product. Change what you will, as long as the assignment gets off my desk. I’m a whore.

Their paychecks are inflated because they change the commas in them.

Try it, boys and girls…it’s magic!

"Hey, am I mentioned in it? I’ll run out and buy a copy if I’m mentioned in it… "

—Yeah, you WERE mentioned in it (remember your remark about how good in bed Darrin must be?) till the Editor from Hell got her hands on it. Now you’re nowhere to be seen. I slipped a reference to Wally in the January column, which no doubt will be axed, too.

As I tried to explain to her, humor writing may not be a fine art, but there IS a trick to it: phrasing, the use of certain words, the buildup to the punchline; there’s a certain rhythm to it that you can’t fuck with if you don’t know what you’re doing. Which she DOESN’T. I have exactly 350 words in which to create three or four good buildups and jokes, and if you remove one brick, the whole thing tumbles down and people get injured.

So I don’t know if I’m still writing it or not—why bother, if it’s only getting me BAD exposure?

I don’t know, this is beginning to appear to be a thinly veiled attempt to drum up interest among the dopers to go out an buy a mag we otherwise wouldn’t. Playing us like a violin.
Maybe when it comes out you could post your orig, so we can do our own side by side. Of course, I’m sure that would violate all kinds of agreements betw you and the rag. But we wouldn’t tell!

Umm, Dins, maybe you didn’t understand—I am telling you NOT to buy the October issue! Jesus, if I were trying to plug the damn rag, I’d just post a “buy this magazine!” thread like I did with my books—have you ever known me to be subtle?

I bought the issue with the Scooby Doo article, and I must say that it didn’t sound very Eve-ish to me. I knew there had to be an evil editor involved! Is there any way you could post the original?

Yeah, that’s what we love about you, Eve, your coy subtlety.
Hahahahahaha.
See, I’m onto that sneaky reverse psychology trick of yours. I watched the Brady Bunch!

Fight back the way Dorothy Parker would.

Your editor’s talents run the gamut, from A to B.

I already dumped my original Scooby-Doo column, but here’s MY version of the October one. Feel free to check it against the joke-free one that will appear in the October Movieline:

Thanks to the wonders of video and cable TV, our generation can do what our parents and grandparents couldn’t—revisit the beloved entertainments of our childhood and go, “were we insane?” I remember Bewitched fondly, so I picked up a three-episode video (Columbia Tristar). I guess compared to Gilligan’s Island and Petticoat Junction, Bewitched is Noël Coward-quality. But even the brilliant cast and clever concept can’t quite gloss over scripts on the level of third-grade knock-knock jokes.

You all know the plot, right? Ad exec Darrin Stevens marries perky witch; wackiness ensues as she tries to be a normal suburban housewife for his sake. By the way, I actually know a number of ad execs who got into the business because of Darrin (I should talk—I became a Girl Reporter under the influence of Brenda Starr!). I could never warm up to the whole concept of Darrin: “Naw, I don’t want untold riches or fame, Sam—just make me some dinner!” In addition to which, the guy was a blatant anti-witch bigot: can you imagine if he’d married a black woman and forced her to go around in whiteface? Think of the zany mixups, when his Klan pals visited while her family was there!

The three episodes on this tape feature Darrin I (Dick York), which I was happy about; but they also have nosey neighbor Gladys Kravitz II (I preferred the vaudeville shrillness of Gladys I, Alice Pearce). The first two shows have first Samantha, then Endora, losing their powers—oddly, when Dr. Bombay is summoned, it’s without the cry of “Emergency, come right away!” I thought I’d remembered—I didn’t just hallucinate that, did I? In the third episode, the delightfully farchadat Aunt Clara tranports the family back to the 17th century for a real old-fashioned Thanksgiving. Darrin nearly gets burned as a witch (yes, I know, they hanged witches then, but I guess “burning” was funnier). We also get to enjoy hilariously inaccurate “Pilgrim” costumes and dialogue (no one seems to notice Aunt Clara’s hennaed perm or Sam’s huge false eyelashes).

As expected, all three scripts are painfully awful—but the laugh track reliably wets its little pants every time Darrin says, “Saaam!” or Endora calls him “Durwood.” I’d love to be a laugh track, wouldn’t you? They seem to find humor in every little thing. Laugh tracks are never depressed or out-of-sorts; I’ll bet they never need therapy or Paxil.

There is one reason to grab these tapes—to see a cast you can’t beat. The always-wonderful Elizabeth Montgomery and Dick York make a great road-company Burns and Allen. The Stevenses are one of the sitcom families where you really wonder about their sex life; I’ll bet Darrin wasn’t so dead-set against witchcraft when the lights were out. My friend Ike adds that “Darrin must have been incredible in the sack—I mean, she could have had Errol Flynn or Casanova or anyone, and she stuck with that doofus!”

But the high point for me was those two brilliant character comediennes: the over-the-top campy Agnes Moorehead as Endora (how old were you when you first got the joke in her name?), and the incomparable Marion Lorne as Aunt Clara (we all have an Aunt Clara in our family—some of us are the Aunt Clara in our family). As Mr. Mirror becomes less kind in the harsh light of day, somehow these two ladies make old age seem a little less terrifying and a little more stylish. Now, if only I could find my own personal laugh track . . .

I’ve gotta believe that all of your troubles stem from your continued nonuse of my name.

Damn. I’m embarassed to admit I just NOW got the joke in her name.

It’s my own fault for never having watched BEWITCHED reruns after the age of seven.

Damn, now I have to go out and get a copy of the mag.
Thanks a lot! (But I promise I’ll read it in the store without paying for it!)
Oh, and about your comma usage …

Well, not that the above column is a work of art or the funniest thing ever written—but if you could see how completely joke-free it is rendered in the new Movieline . . . Anything you think is remotely amusing above? You can bet it was cut.

I gotta get ahold of the folks at Entertainment Weekly and Premiere and see if they wanna steal me away. Ever since my editor died last year, it’s been getting worse and worse at Movieline.

If everyone at Movieline was laid end to end, I wouldn’t be a bit surprised.
That probably doesn’t have quite the same sting that it used to.