My Standards Are Not Too High For Girls

Ok, I gotta clear this up for me and for other good guys having a hard time finding a free girl. Someone in my last post felt like my standards are too high when it comes 2 choosing females. Well let me say that my standards are not too high. The reason I said I gotta clear this up for other good guys with tough luck as well is because a comm misconception is that good guys having a hard time getting a girl don’t have a girl is because they only want women who look real good. This is not true. It seems as though people with this misconception feel like us good guys with tough luck should just settle for someone without considering their looks even if they are unattractive. Let me tell u the reality of our expectations.

Yes, we do want a girl who looks good but not all of us bad luck guys expect the girl 2 be super fine like a internet model. I can be happy with a girl who looks decent. I mostly seek gils who are a 7 ,8, 9, or 10. I will sometimes take a 6 if she has some kind of extraordinary body feature. Does this make me a bad person? Of course not. I have the right 2 choose who I wanna be with. I just won’t take a girl lower than a 6 because I can’t be happy with an unattractive girl. I gotta have a girl I enjoy looking at and licking on. I want somebody I can feel comfortable showing off 2 my family and friends.

And looks alone won’t make me automatically get with a girl. For instance, if a 7 is more of a good person than a 10, then I will choose the girl that is a 7 because she has good looks and a good soul.

And to answer the question I know a lot of u are wondering, yes I would rather pay a good looking girl rather than be with an unattractive free girl. Not out of foolishness, but because I can only be happy with a good looking girl

Ok then.

Yakuza, are you a 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10?

Uh… How about looking for “females” that have got intelligence, confidence and wit? Those that are highly motivated in whatever they’re out to achieve in life? Or any number of other non-visual qualities?

Something tells me that you’ll be stuck with escorts until you stop looking at “females” as if they were pieces of meat. Kind of sad, that.

Well, you’re a winner. I can’t see why you can’t get a girl.

Good to know.

Why would any woman put herself in the position of choosing to be with a guy who not only doesn’t have a decent job (something a lot of us can sympathize with, given the economy, but not exactly a bonus) and who spends half his income on prostitutes?

I mean, I can’t imagine how any woman in her right mind would want to be with you, unless you were compensating her for her time. Any woman (and honestly, are you twelve years old? Because that’s the last time I heard boys ranking women from 1 to 10) could do way better than you.

The problem is that your standards are too low for yourself. It shouldn’t be a shock when every woman finds you slip below her standards.

Not that I’m exactly an expert in the heterosexual mating ritual, but I’m fairly sure most such “females” are not primarily interested in men who are homeless because they blow all their money on prostitutes.

There might be a few homeless gals out there who blow all of their money on pimps? It’d be a match made in heaven.

Blowjob on the first date automatically raises a girls ranking by 3 points.

Just sayin’.

You realize that good-looking girls only hang out with you because you pay them to, right? and not because they like you or want to spend time with you? How many freebies do you get from your ‘friend’?

Trust me, I’m not sitting at home waiting for you to call, I really do have better things to do. Like laundry, or cleaning the cat box.

So, does that turn a “10” into a 13? Or does it mean that girls rated at 10 don’t give blowjobs on the first date?

You got it. Unless you are a celebrity, or a millionaire, or have an ample supply of coke.

Life’s a bitch, ain’t it? :smiley:

Y’know, when I saw the subject of the thread, I instantly guessed who the OP was. Not by name, mind, I didn’t remember that. I said “I’ll bet that’s the guy who blows half his income on hookers”.

That whole 1-10 system is outdated anyways.

We cool kids now use a 3 digit code to objectify our women. The first number is the attractiveness of the face, the second is whether or not you’d do her (so virtually always a 1), the third number represents her body.

So a 519 is a woman whose face is only average, but has a completely rocking body. While a 919 is your perfect woman.

Knowing is half the battle. -G.I. Joe

Even if I didn’t spend money on escorts and had an apartment, I still wouldn’t be able 2 get a free girl because I wouldn’t be able 2 financially impress them because I have a low income job. I have no choice but 2 get an escort, so therefore I choose not 2 have a traditional place 2 stay so I can have more money for escorts

For example, one gigantic toe.

Its not that I blow half my money on hookers. I invest my money in escorts to keep myself from going insane

Bad news, dude…

I really wish you’d stop using texting abbreviations in a discussion forum.

I think we need to see your picture.