I have read the thread now, but I didn’t notice any burning questions for me. Some people asked if I was fake-peeking: No, I’m not. I don’t think there is anything more I can usefully say about the message I got.
Lynching outside the claim: there are really only the two mason claims. Everyone else is just passing on information they don’t know how they got, of unknown reliability.
There was a theory yesterday that Krays was an alternate lynch to a wolf. The other lynches were Peeker, Texcat, and Silver Jan. Assuming Texcat is a mason, that leaves Peeker and Silver Jan. I have vague-ish suspicions of Jan. I don’t have anything on peeker. I think it would be bad to lynch a mason today. For these reasons, I am leaving my vote on Jan.
I thought the case on Ben was good, but I don’t think he would have cleared Jan like that if he was scum with her, and peeker’s was the wagon he was jumping on and off. So I am thinking ‘indecisive Townie’ for him now.
I don’t at all like the votes on the claimed masons, especially ones that say it will give us information to lynch one or other of them. (PCM, I’m looking at you in particular). But there was a lot of confusion today. Lots of people totally failing to understand what was going on. That makes it hard to analyse who is genuinely confused, who is pretending to be confused and who isn’t confused but has a different way of thinking to me. I’ll look more at this tomorrow.