Weedy! while you are here,
Did your result on me N1 look like the reveals in the night results thread? Or was it shorter?
I think this is a pretty interesting cultural clash as well, though not as much of a clash as the fakepeek/vote a wagon thing.
I’ve actually been voted before on POG for voting for someone and including a reason because it “seemed like you thought you needed a reason for it”. It was like my first or second game, and from that point on I gave a reason when I had a solid one or just did the “I think hes a villager, I think hes a wolf” type of thing.
I will say I agree 1000000% with your very last sentence. Get people to talk as much as possible and the wolves should become evident. I wish we had a stricter “lynch anyone not having a ton of input” over there, but it’s more difficult to do with single days. Now that I think about it, I think the single real life day game days are a major factor in our theory on the votes thing:
If you have 15 hours to lynch someone, the reads are going to have to be thin in some instances, whereas if you have say 4 real life days you better have a good reason for you vote with so much information.
This is me again saying that if your target n1 was Gnarly and your target n2 was me and you’ve been getting no results, please please please say something so we can corroborate our peek (assuming my theory is correct)
yeah but i think it just make villagers make up a shitty reason instead of giving no reason or saying no effing clue or whatever, which will lead to more villager suspicion
plus people should vote because voting is good and it generally discourages voting
agree to disagree, but i do think bad reasoning is a good way to find wolves
well the reasons at least have to be reasonable (lol), not necessarily good
probably derailed the thread enough, i think i may put together a villager/wolf list here
Episkey,
I really did mis-read earlier. But still can’t imagine what you think your role is. So your role should say something like your target will receive (sane/insane/paranoid) results on x, where x is what?
Not really making sense to me.
It looked like a role PM.
I think I’m an insane seer as my targets were silver and pizza.
In our games (idk if you have them here) an insane seer is a seer who gets all the peeks backwards. So if I peek a villager, it’ll tell me the player is a wolf. If I peek a wolf, it’ll tell me that player is a villager.
I think this is the case because making me a Paranoid seer (someone who gets back “wolf” on every single peek) would be the absolute worst village role ever and I don’t think Gad would put the worst role in the world in this game (though it’s still possible, and if thats the case I’ll just have to play as a vanilla).
Luckily, Insane seers can still be useful once you figure it out.
The tricky part is: I’ve targeted Silver and Pizza. They’ve both received investigation reports, but we have NO IDEA how Gnarly and Myself were chosen to be the ones to be investigated.
My theory is that it’s sort of a seer tandem (similar to the mystic seers spoken of earlier), where I choose the target and someone else chooses the person getting investigated.
So if I target you lets say, and whoever player X is targets villagerbobby, you would receive a message stating “villagerbobby is a wolf”.
To continue further: I believe whoever targeted gnarly night 1 and me night 2 is “player x”, and if we work together we can give flipped peeks of unsure players to clear villagers
Thanks! And did you see my post earlier where I said that I was sure that the color was intentional? That there was one protector who left his targets feeling safe, and another that left them feeling a warm glow? I’m sure those helps in the color are meant to help us figure out our roles. Was there anything like that surrounding the role PM in your post? Can you find a “tell” to tell you what investigator sent you the results?
villagers for tone or mechanics or voting or any reason
askthepizzaguy
donk4x
episkey
gnarlyecharlie/texcat (masons right?)
Naf (have come around on him assuming he is who i think, lol)
pwns obviously
giraffe for being blasters target and outting it
wolfy for any of the same reasons, no specific order
sanga
cracked
precambrianmollusc (was sort of pushed by both above this tho i think)
bufftabby (these two go together with a somewhat convoluted theory)
idle thoughts
wolf list seems way too long compared to villa list
probably others on both, going down the player list i’m getting a bunch of people confused
ill add/subtract from this later now that i have a list
hmmm, idle claimed jan was a roleblocker, did she ever respond to this?
I don’t know what to say to this. Why are we trying to figure this out in the thread? Whoever targetted you knows who they are. Especially if they targetted ed or PCM (was it PCM?) as well.
did you out another peek today or anything weedy?
No
I’ve had suspicions on both scathach and sangaman, and been duh-- one of those “S” guys. The good news is that at least I’ve kept semptimus separate from them, but sempitmus has been very quiet – not a good sign.
alright i was rereading but got to be to much
trying to see how likely it is silverjan is wolf role blocker given what we know
matters quite a bit for idle/jan
I am sure that the color helps figure out who the doctors are. I suspect there may be similar color for the investigative roles. I just want to help the docs and cops figure out that they are, in fact, docs and cops.
night thread, may your dreams be filled with killing wolves and banging wenches
More than once in a row, maybe. I have no rule restriction against targeting a person I’ve previously targeted as long as it wasn’t the night prior, same as everyone else I’d imagine.
I am an innocent townie.
No, there was no admission of guilt. :rolleyes:
Lie detectors, have at it.