Yes I did and I said that if I was a roleblocker then surely I would have got a result from my night action.
Posts like this is interfering with the thread.
I’m considering it angleshooting.
This guy is a villager for this post.
I’ll go look at his other posts later.
So that leaves Silver as a scum or at least as a receiver of false information.
Good observation.
I don’t get this?
can you explain the deeper thoughts behind it?
And how will the watcher now if he’s a watcher, if he has been targeting people who haven’t had NA targeted at them?
oh…
ok question: who is episkey?
never voting lilflower, in fact, if I was lying about my actions giving me a no result, I would tell you I seer peeked her Town. In other words, if I die and am revealed as a seer, remember my peek.
pwnsall seems to be doing good work, he is also probably a Townie, say 75%.
Hi duck!
I am certainly interested in askthepizzaguy’s role, very active, most likely Town, but obviously dont get some of his points. for instance, if the wolves kill him at night, they certainly arent going to come out the next day and say "HEY, I targetted him and now he is dead! " lol
Hey JD
I understand your interest for pizzaguy - cause I find that statement pretty weid.
not as weird as sangamans - but still pretty weird.
No I believe that he wants the town watcher to target him every night - hereby not gaining any other information.
It’s a bold move to do as scum - do you think he could do it?
Well people here have said he is good, but I have no feel for how people from this board play in general.
Pretty ballsy, no doubt, but it only locks the watcher up for one night right?
Well, you’re half right.
ATPG is not from this board.
I think Episkey is JimHalpert.
that is a strange statement
you must have learned a lot in that one game
[/QUOTE]
You can love him or hate him, but Pizza is certainly a smart Mafia player.
His self-posted death notice (tired of waiting for Moderator) is a classic.
Wolves probably wouldn’t ‘keep bussing each other’
But a Wolf might get on a bandwagon of a teammate early. And then either stay or fail to find a way off.
With the native group here, throwing an early vote on a Wolfbuddy is pretty common. One drawback is that if that buddy gets more heat, you can’t really get off the bandwagon without garnering some suspicion. So a wolf’s option is to remain on the wagon in an attempt to earn some Townie Cred.
Basically, an early vote for a Wolfbuddy is given because:
- The Wolves will hope that the target doesn’t get lynched or killed early and the vote is just a one-off as we call it.
- However, when the target is dead (and this usually happens), the voter can point to his solid voting record as proof of Villageness.
- Also, in the event that the voter gets killed or lynched, the target can point and say “Look a wolf was voting for me!”
We call such actions distancing. It’s really not so rare.
I think bussing might be much more common around these parts than you are used to. While it does reduce the number of Wolves, one bus, or even two is going to help a teammate or two make it to EndGame, which is the goal of the Wolves, isn’t it?
I suppose it developed because alanses like these used to be common, and so Wolves found a good hiding place.
I think, especially in the case of Blaster Master, bussing was a valid option. I’ll detail my line of thinking:
- Blaster was unaware of his power (most likely)
- Blaster knew that someone had gotten a false peek at him.
- Blaster also knew that eventually that person would flip and probably either be revealed as a paranoid (best case for Wolves) or insane (worst case for Wolves) Cop
- Therefore, Blaster potentially had a limited life span anyway.
Therefore, I will not clear any of the voters for Blaster. Even the early ones.
Sorry if it seems I’m not participating. I am spending many hours reading the thread, but scum-hunting can wait a little as we have a few good candidates already. The consensus to Lynch Sangaman seems OK to me – I agree that the explanation was scummier than the slip itself.
I’ve as yet been unable to discern anything about my Power. I’d be happy to reveal my targets on the off-chance it would be useful information later on. I’d like to hear from others as to whether revealing would be a good or bad idea.
I guess it’s a cultural difference.
We have a phrase here “Scum wouldn’t do that.”
It’s a common defense used by a player. “Look at the things I’ve done, why would a Scum ever do that?”
And that’s exactly why a Scum would do that. To have a defense pater in the game, when it really matters.
Even if the Scum win, most of them are likely to die at some point. it’s best if they leave some Townie Cred for their teammates as they do.
Now, that’s not to say that Scum definitely did that, because it’s certainly more likely that a Town player would act that way, but it’s just not out of the question (or even out of the ordinary here) for a Scum to do that as well.
You’re full of shit again there PizzaGuy. Do you think that bigger words make them more true? I’m not going through all of Peeker’s 300+ posts, but here’s a sampling.
<snippped>
this is mas dangerous you are going to follow someone else’s lead. crud even as masons and scum we typically do our own thing. second i am becoming more and more concerned that pizza is not town. so this one puts your alignment which was already suspect even more in question. plus i think your judgement might be a tad faulty as well.
ok here is where i stand. giraffe is scum because of the waffle and the subsequent OMGYS.
farcking ben is scum because of the perch waddle yesterDay.
pizza needs to be eliminated. i mean sheesh claiming that he is vig and letting it hang is all sorts or wrong. if he is telling the truth he must be eliminated. if he is lying then he must be eliminated (shoot that sounds all freudian and stuff).
of these three i think pizza is the way to go. but i will take jan’s advice and for the more likely percentage play.
<snipped>
this.
if he is telling the truth and scum have a redirctor he must die. if he is lying then he must die.
unovte all
vote pizza
I don’t think a villager apothecary would be interested in healing a potential wolf just so that they have something to do. But if you disagree and are afraid the healer with cure brewha, here is what I propose.
Make a case for why brewha is probably a wolf.
Organize a group of players who agree that brewha is probably a wolf and needs to die.
Get those people to announce that if brewha is cured, he will be turbo-lynched the next day.
Furthermore, if brewha flips wolf and it is revealed who was responsible for curing him, that person will be turbo-lynched next.
This should be disincentive enough to prevent any townie healers from targeting brewha. If a wolf healer is bold enough to try saving brewha anyway and gets caught, we might get two lynch two wolves for the price of one.
If you find that to be too much work, I really don’t think a healer will risk themselves trying to heal Brewha tonight anyway considering how much heat he’s getting. And if he does get healed, the option to lynch is still on the table.
Anyway, it’s stupid late on the east coast so I’m going to sleep.
He’s been trying 1 & 2 for the past several days. He ‘is disappoint’ no one is listening.
It was very interesting reading those posts of** Peekers**. I have never see** Pizza** play as scum before but there is always a first time. Actually, though, if he is scum his posting style isn’t much different from when he’s town.
That’s the best way to play as scum. Changing your posting style is definitely a scum tell. I’m sure PizzaGuy is a good enough player to know this.
giraffe also soft cleared for being targeted by blaster n1
Now THAT is a very good point. For the reason PizzaGuy says in response to me raising the possibility of Scum targeting Scum on N1:
Why wouldn’t I target someone else first just to make sure I don’t have negative powers? I understand I have yet to make a good impression here, but I REALLY hope people don’t think I’m that bleepin stupid.
You aren’t. I was noting the possibility, and I have backed off of it. On N0, only one power acted. So on N1, 36 people didn’t know anything about their powers. It would be very risky to the point of stupid for a Wolf to target a fellow Wolf, when there was the potential to block/kill/do something else nasty to a teammate. It’s possible, just risky.
Scuba Ben may be a protector, since his target on n1 felt safe. Ed, did you get a message about feeling safe on n2?
Scuba Ben, did you get a message about feeling healthy or anything after Ed targeted you on n1?
To take these in reverse order. I got no message about feeling healthy or anything. I got an instruction from Gad saying (extremely paraphrased to avoid quoting the PM) “Send in two targets next Night or I WILL CUT YOU!”
As for me potentially being a protector, as I recall on D2 two or three people reported feelings of safe / health / warm glow. On D3 only two have reported that. We’re short at least one possible protection. So there exists uncertainty as to whether I’m a protector. I’m strongly considering targeting someone Tonight who will report results Tomorrow without being prompted. At this point, I can choose from quite a few loudmouths. I’m sure everybody will understand that I won’t say who I pick.
What I want is the town “WATCHER” role to WATCH me every night to see who targets me.
A single Watcher cannot watch you every Night. RTFOP, everybody must change targets every Night.
I have no idea. But if I were an apothecary and I had no one to heal besides brewha, I’d heal brewha just to make sure that’s what I can do, plus prove that’s what I was doing that night.
This is a good move for a potential Apothecary, regardless of alignment. It would clear up their role.
After about 4PM EDT, I will be gone for the rest of the Day. I’ll be spending the Night preparing for the hurricane; I’ll check in if and when I can.
I don’t get this?
can you explain the deeper thoughts behind it?
And how will the watcher now if he’s a watcher, if he has been targeting people who haven’t had NA targeted at them?
Sure.
We’re in a game where everyone has a night action. Where some folks, like a true detective, will get results which mean they know who they are, but it will be quite rare.
A “watcher” role is a role who targets someone and becomes aware of who, if anyone, is also targeting the player they’re targeting that night. Not what action, or what alignment, just the names.
A “watcher” role will be in this game due to how common it is. I CANNOT be protected by a doctor every night, therefore I want to be “watched” as often as possible. It gives me a 50/50 chance of my death revealing my attacker. The watcher will not likely ever have a better shot at catching scum, or, I’ll survive several more rounds. Either outcome is fine with me.
As for why “No doctors” Is several reasons.
-
Asking for doc protection lessens the odds I’ll be murdered. I want the watcher to be not wasting his or her time.
-
I’m not cleared enough to be asking for doc protection. Doc should protect whoever they think is most likely to be attacked, and most valuable out of those.
-
If I am forced to poison every night, and the apothecary may not always be with us, then I am a forced vigilante. As such, I will have to poison someone. I’d rather be enough of a threat with my poison that it attracts murders, thereby ending my poisoning and relieving the townies of worry that they’ll be poisoned next.
-
As I mentioned before, the odds of me hitting scum are much lower than the odds of me hitting townies. As such, absorbing a murder (hopefully with a watcher watching me) is the single best move I can make other than getting very lucky with my poison. Luck only lasts for so long. Being murdered and taking down a scumbag through the “watcher” role is my single best move other than nailing scumbags on consecutive nights, which the odds are very long against,
You can love him or hate him, but Pizza is certainly a smart Mafia player.
Not sure you could infer that from the game you saw me play. ![]()
You’re full of shit again there PizzaGuy. Do you think that bigger words make them more true? I’m not going through all of Peeker’s 300+ posts, but here’s a sampling.
Oh. Thought you were referring to my opinion of peeker. I never thought he was scummy, and I was correct.
As for peeker, he felt a lot of people were scummy, and he was wrong about me.