Krayz, peeker, dancecat, silver, or tex cat is a wolf imo becaus of wagons. I don’t want to lynch tex for reasons stated above, I have no clue about the case on silver, and I feel like krayz’s fakepeek is villagery and there’s a non-zero chance he could be a seer and his claim of dance is true. I think that possibility is admittedly remote, but it’s still a better villa case for them than I have at all for peeker.
Additionally, peekers early wagon steam has begun to fall off. Don’t know the tendency of this boards wolf teams, but bussing a fellow wolf early and then backing off of him later in the day is completely in the wheel house of poggers.
AFK until Night, I think. I might have time to read but not post. Will keep my vote in place barring unforeseen circumstances and time to find out about them.
Will someone please tell me the case on Texcat in 100 words or less? None of his posts really stuck out to me (but then again, sometimes it’s the “meh” ones that end up getting me).
I should add the Episkey put on probably the most memorable wolf performance I’ve seen. You probably shouldn’t clear him at all until he’s claimed by a seer.
I think he’s a villager for a couple of reasons, and the same with krayz. I don’t like when I have village leans on the top two wagons. Get on peeker with me imo.
I’m at a loss about the whole Peeker thing. He started with coherence - which has been pointed out - is not like a villager peeker. Then, when challanged, became his usual abrasive, babbling self. I’m not interested in essay bets, BTW. So, either he is town and is just back on the vicodin and vodka diet, or he’s scum and playing his usual self to hide his “scum tell”. I put that in quotes, because I don’t necessarily believe it’s the case. Of course, it’s all a WIFOM case and have no idea what to make of it as of yet. So, stinky smelly FOS, but not enough for a vote.
This, however:
I don’t like it. Latching on to someone else’s reasoning gives her an out if Ed turns up town. Hey, it was Naf’s idea after all! And the reasoning of “just not quite right” is pretty weak to begin with.
I like it but there’s literally 6 larger, close wagons at this point. Could you please help consolidate on one of them instead of creating another late wagon?
I’ll have to think about that, crackedquads. You make a good point that gnarlycharlie isn’t being helpful. I’m not big on switching my vote onto em this late in the Day – Tomorrow, OTOH, that’s a good place to start.
I guess nobody saw my question.
Not really important anyway, but we used to have a theory in some games (well, some swore by it…others didn’t) that “Third vote is scum”.
The idea behind it was that placing a third vote on someone is neither being one of the very first (instigator) or very last (bandwagoner) votes, thus staying out of the public eye and trying to “blend” in with the other votes subtly.
As I said, we’ve had some players swear by it and actually use it as a reason to cast a vote.
And, too, we’ve had countless discussion and debates over it.
So I was just curious as to whether the new (to here) people have ever experienced that discussion?
Just so gameplay/strategizing doesn’t halt and become just about my question:
Sayth Crackedquads:
To me–and that has been the experience I’ve seen the most–the beginning and then falling off of an initial (one of the first, if not THE first) bandwagon is usually a nulltell. In many cases an early bandwagon that grew strong then ebbed were actual Townies, but I can remember a few of them turning out to be scum later. I wouldn’t put too much faith in it myself, but YMMV.
And if you really hate it, www.idlemafia.com and www.giraffeboards.com. You are all too late for the sign ups on the most recent GB game, but there are sign ups for a game at idlemafia. No 60 second buffer, it’s got skins, seperate threads for each Day/Night.
Well, let’s not bring it up again for about 3 Days. By then the otherboarders will have forgotten about this exchange and it will be valid for them again.
