Obviously if you think the top 3 wagons are 100% lock cleared completely verified townies, then don’t vote for them.
But can you at least consider the value in casting your vote on someone who is, 42% likely to be a wolf, when the other two candidates are 19.5% likely to be a wolf? If your vote is 65% likely to be a wolf in your eyes but no one else is voting for him, there is zero value in that vote. You don’t help the village at all. At least voting for the 42% guy helps protect the 19.5% guys.
He’d previously pointed out to NAF, who’s said that he couldn’t get behind any of the 3 vote leaders, that he was actually voting Peeker, one of the three vote leaders. Given this, I can see him jumping on the “I’m not voting” part of your sentence and correcting you. That’s a misreading of your post and a null tell. What I was questioning is his response to you, he said he’d read it out of context when in fact he’d snipped most of the sentence and replaced it with “…”. I realise it could well be just another misreading of your post as you didn’t actually accuse him of editing out the context but quoting you out of context but I wanted to hear his response.
I believe crackedquads’ point is valid, but eod is in 40 minutes so let’s not continue discussing it right now. There’s plenty of time to discuss it thoroughly at another time. I think I saw you guys allow chat at night? That would be the perfect place for it if so, not in the thread causing distraction 40 minutes before eod.
actually i see less value on that than the teats on a boar hog. seriously, you would suggest that someone who feels one way and then moves a vote just to appease the mob is doing anyone any good. talk about no fucking accountability. in my mind when i vote for someone there is high likelihood that they are scum (80+). so why the fart would i even consider, in your hypothetical, moving to someone THAT OTHER PEOPLE WHO INCLUDE SCUM think that there is a 42 percent chance of being scum. jeebus god put holes in swiss cheese so that we can see the other side, given the proper perspective, of course.
Unfortunately, peeker lacks the filter that most of the rest of us have, and he tends to say exactly what he’s thinking; I don’t think he’s intentionally being a prick and (although I’m sure it feels personal, having been on the receiving end) I honestly don’t think he means it personally.
sorry. i have been know to be antagonistic. and if i crossed your boundary. sorry. but shoot don’t play ever on giraffe or idle’s board. this is kind of cupcakish. you are an idiot and i am calling you on it. you likewise feel the same about me. and that is totally cool in the context of this endeavor. it’s a farcking game.
mod question: if we want to send a pm to a game player that is absolutely not related to this current game what level of infucktion would that be, if any?
If it has absolutely nothing, zero, zilch to do with the game or anything related to the game, it’s probably fine. Copy me on it if you’re worried it might be borderline. Send it to me first for my approval if you’re legitimately worried it might be borderline. Don’t send it at all if you think it is borderline.
The extent of any opinion I have on has only been formed in the last couple of posts you’ve made, and that is that you are, at best, an orangutan who was fortunate enough to stumble on a copy of “Typing for Dummies”
Thanks Gad
Looking at it again, I can’t emphasize enough how much I dislike the Krayz wagon.
I’m telling you: As someone that has played with him in every single game he’s played on the other forum minus one, this is NOT in line with how I’ve viewed his scum game. It’s different for the quick reads, but that string of posts I quoted earlier is entirely in line with his town game.
Just think about this: Someone voted him for being “condescending” during his reads spurt, and someone else voted him with their VERY FIRST POST.