Sorry. While I don’t like to make people angry at me, I’m not going to stop replying to you to tell you when I think you’re wrong. I may be trying to be less confrontational than I used to be, but I do have my limits. I still do not believe in rewarding those who try to get away with throwing a tantrum in an attempt to shut people up.
If you were someone else, I might think you were having some sort of hard time and were not being yourself. But you love to pretend like you’re better than me, and then freak out if I disagree. You’ve done it back since I disagreed with you on whether attendance should be a significant part of one’s grade as long as they understand the material.
Nothing in your reply addresses what I said. It’s just ad hominem, and of a rather ridiculous kind. You’re calling me a narcissist, when most of my posts are about others and how we need to put them first.
I continue to argue that you should back off attacking Facebook when they’re finally doing what we want. It’s a bad idea to attack at that point, to get all bent out of shape over whether they were on our side before. What they are doing is a good thing.
That you see Facebook as the enemy right at the time when they’re actually acting the way we want is bad logic and harmful, and I stand by that.
And, no, @Dseid, I attacked no one. All I did was disagree with someone. I went out of my way not to attack anyone. That is, in fact, one of the ways I’ve been trying to be nicer.
But my niceness still does have limits, and harassing me or bullying me to try and force me to shut up or stop disagreeing with you is my limit. Someone disagreeing with me may get me to reevaluate my position. Someone who doesn’t assume bad faith and points out how I might have been misunderstood may get my attention.
I’m not going to become the guy who just goes along with whatever the loudest or most angry person says I should do. I’ve had enough of having to do that in my real life to allow it to happen online.