NFL 2006 Weekly Predictions

Week 8 Picks

1:00pm…**TITANS…3…Texans…41½…**Texans and the over.
1:00pm…**EAGLES…7½…Jaguars…40…**Eagles and the over.
1:00pm…**BENGALS…4…Falcons…44…**Falcons and the under.
1:00pm…**GIANTS…9…Bucs…40½…**Bucs and the over.
1:00pm…**BEARS…16…49ers…41½…**Bears and the over.
1:00pm…**PACKERS…3½…Cards…44½…**Packers and the under.
1:00pm…**CHIEFS…6…Seahawks…36½…**Chiefs and the under.
1:00pm…**SAINTS…1½…Ravens…37…**Saints and the under.

4:05pm…**CHARGERS…9½…Rams…45…**Rams and the over.
4:15pm…**Steelers…9…RAIDERS…38½…**Steelers and the over.
4:15pm…**BROWNS…2…Jets…37½…**Jets and the over.
4:15pm…**BRONCOS…3…Colts…39½…**Colts and the over.

8:15pm…**PANTHERS…5…Cowboys…41…**Panthers and the over.
8:30pm…**Patriots…1½…VIKINGS…38½…**Vikings and the over.

Spread Picker Picks
4 Browns
4 Ravens
2 Bengals
2 Cardinals
2 49ers
2 Panthers
2 Patriots
2 Seahawks
2 Texans
1 Broncos
1 Chargers

Ugh, I only agree with the spread picker on two picks: the Texans and the Panthers.

Early Games
Risk 55 for 50 on a 3-team tease: Texans getting 11, Giants giving 1 and Eagles getting ½

Late Games
Risk 55 for 50 on a 3-team tease: Chargers giving 1½, Steelers giving 1 and Jets getting 10

Sunday Night
Risk 55 for 50 on the Panthers

Monday Night
Risk 30 for 25 on the Over

Arizona might be on pace for the Biggest Implosion Ever.

Pretty respectable team, lost a weird game, got manhandled by the Raiders, then manhandled by Green Bay…

I’ve never seen a single member of the coaching staff consistently hold back a team like Mo Carthon of the Browns.

A lot of people think it’s all about talent, and that coaches really aren’t important - but we looked like a completely different team. Part of it was playing the unspectacular Jets. But, for example, people would blame our O-line for all offensive failures, calling them the worst in the league, etc. They’re not that bad, but Mo was trying to do the round peg in square hole thing… calling athletic, movement based running players for a bunch of old, slow linemen… calling the wrong protection schemes on passes. The coaching staff playing up to, rather than against, the strengths of the offense alone suddenly makes the talent look that much better. The play calling was drastically better - we ran up the gut on 3rd and 1 for I think the first time all year, we actually apparently had passes in the 10-20 yard intermediate range (previous, all routes were either 5 yard slants, outs, or curls, or 40 yard bombs), and there were no completely head scratchers.

Good stuff.

Yeah, and adding the refs to the roster helped the defense tremendously. That was a blatant force-out, and its non-call was by far the worst officiating decision I’ve seen since the pass interference non-call on the botched FG atttempt at the end of the 2002 Wildcard game between the Giants and 49ers.

Seriously, WTF? And the color guy in the booth is so biased against the Jets it made me want to puke.

I am aware that the Jets are a bad team, and that they really didn’t do nearly enough to deserve the win anyway. And that they probably would have lost in overtime regardless of who won the coin toss. But it’s one thing to lose legitimately; it’s another to have the refs decide to award a loss by fiat.

Did you happen to catch the Cowboys game? There was a force-out in that one as well, and it wasn’t remotely as guaranteed-in as Chris Baker was, and it was correctly labeled a force-out immediately.

I have seen 6 different analysts condemn that decision. No doubt Mike & Mike and Mike & The Maddog will add another four to that number. The ONLY person I have heard claim that Baker wouldn’t have come down in bounds was that fucking color guy.

Fuck the shit-eating Browns. Goddamn I fucking despise the AFC North. Buncha criminals, thugs and cheaters. Fuck them all.

For those who don’t know what I’m talking about: Jets down by 7, no timeouts, 4th down, one minute left in the game, Chad does a great move to avoid the blitz and airs it out to the end zone where my man Chris Baker makes a fantastic one-armed grab while jumping less than a foot off the ground, well inside the out-of-bounds line, coming down totally in bounds to tie the game. While in mid-air, he was knocked out of bounds. Ruled incomplete.

That, my friends, is what they call a CROCK OF SHIT way to end the game. I expect an apology from the league, though those don’t account for shit. (They issued an official apology for the Giants-49ers game. The league said the Giants should have been awarded one extra play inside the 20, and a FG would have won the game. Sorry, game over, Giants go home, 49ers advance; our bad. FUCKERS!!!)

Easy now. While you’ve described the rats and bungles, the browns and steelers are high character teams.

A good friend of mine was cut by Denny Green at Minnesota, Ray Berry. He hates hates hates the guy and I’ve called him after the last two AZ losses just to hear him, a normally pretty reserved individual, absolutely cackle with delight.

Week 8

Early Games
28 **TITANS…3…**22 **Texans…**50 **41½…**Texans and the over.
.6 **EAGLES…7½.**13 **Jaguars…**19 **40…**Eagles and the over.
27 **BENGALS…4…**29 **Falcons…**56 **44…**Falcons and the under.
17 **GIANTS…9…**3 **Bucs…**20 **40½…**Bucs and the over.
41 **BEARS…16…**10 **49ers…**51 **41½…**Bears and the over.
31 **PACKERS…3½.**14 **Cards…**45 **44½…**Packers and the under.
35 **CHIEFS…6…**28 **Seahawks.**63 **36½…**Chiefs and the under.
22 **SAINTS…1½.**35 **Ravens…**57 **37…**Saints and the under.
Late Games
38 **CHARGERS…9½.**24 **Rams…**62 **45…**Rams and the over.
13 **Steelers…9…**20 **RAIDERS…**33 **38½…**Steelers and the over.
20 **BROWNS…2…**13 **Jets…**33 **37½…**Jets and the over.
31 **BRONCOS…3…**34 **Colts…**65 **39½…**Colts and the over.
Night Games
14 **PANTHERS…5…**35 **Cowboys…**49 **41…**Panthers and the over.
31 **Patriots…1½…**7 **VIKINGS…**38 **38½…**Vikings and the over.

Spread Picker Picks
4 Browns WIN
4 Ravens WIN
2 Bengals Loss
2 Cardinals Loss
2 49ers Loss
2 Panthers Loss
2 Patriots WIN
2 Seahawks Loss
2 Texans Loss
1 Broncos Loss
1 Chargers WIN

Holy crap this was a bad week. The spread picker went 4-7, though 2-0 on its best bets was a nice touch. I went 6-10 in the early games, 3-5 in the late, and 1-3 in the night games. Whenever you post a losing record in all timeslots, and your trusty system also posts a losing record, it’s almost a guarantee that your action is going to get killed. Let’s see how my overall 10-18 record this week fared…

Early Games
Risk 55 for 50 on a 3-team tease: Texans getting 11, Giants giving 1 and Eagles getting ½

Ouch, down 55 because the Eagles had to go and implode.

Late Games
Risk 55 for 50 on a 3-team tease: Chargers giving 1½, Steelers giving 1 and Jets getting 10

Double ouch. Once again, a single team imploding – this time it’s the Steelers – cost me. Now down 110 for the week.

Sunday Night
Risk 55 for 50 on the Panthers

Crap, that didn’t help the Giants at all. Nor did it help this Giants fan, now down 165 for the week while white-knuckling the remote.

Monday Night
Risk 30 for 25 on the Over

Ha, one stinkin’ point away. This 30 caps off by far my worst week of the season, down a staggering 195 for the week. “Ouch” is right.

Standings
This week: 10-18 (-195)
Season: 115-108-3, -215 (-26.88 per week)
Spread Picker: 36-38-2; Best Bets: 9-3

Against the Spread
5-2 Bears
5-2 Chargers
5-2 Falcons
5-2 Giants
5-2 Patriots
5-2 Saints
5-2 Vikings

4-2-1 Colts
4-2-1 Jaguars
5-3 Jets
4-2-1 Rams

4-3 Bucs
4-3 Chiefs
4-3 Cowboys
4-3 Ravens
4-3 Titans

3-3-1 Browns
4-4 Eagles
3-3-1 Packers

3-4 Bengals
3-4 Bills
3-4 Broncos
3-4 49ers
3-4 Raiders

2-5 Lions
2-5-1 Panthers
2-5 Redskins
2-5 Seahawks
2-5 Steelers
2-5 Texans

2-6 Cardinals

0-7 Dolphins

I’ve gotten lax on recording my results over the last three weeks. They’ve been decidedly unspectacular. Combining for a 19-21 total ATS and 20-20 versus the O/U. The OMNI picks were bleak posting a 5-10 tally. At least I’m holding onto my positive margin gained early in the season.

The current standings are: 60-52-1, ATS, 61-51-1, O/U and 19-21, OMNI picks.

Scanning my weekly picks, I think I’ve gotten a little lazy over the past few weeks. Or perhaps conservative is the better description. Always seem to be talking myself into taking the favorites and giving the points. When picking underdogs it’s usually when it’s a home team. A few of these “surprises” probably shouldn’t have been such a shock. We’ll have to do our best to start thinking more critically and identifying opportunities.

Same here, me too, and agreed.

When the Pats had the game pretty much locked up at halftime, I decided to get an early jump on the division standings and weekly picks wrap-up so that I’d have several days between involved NFL posting and thinking about my picks for next week. The longer I wait to do the previous week’s wrapup, the less thought goes into my picks for the following week.

Also, a reminder that Thursday games will be starting up soon. I’ll be mindful of that, and will try to post my picks on Wednesday night/Thursday morning.

Btw, I delayed my picks this past week because when I went to do them on Thursday, the Chiefs-Seahawks spread was listed as OFF. Obviously, that was due to the Huard injury during practice, but what exactly does that mean? Is it a pickem, is the game unavailable for action, or what? I’m loathe to split my picks across multiple posts, (which would make printing them out a bit of a PITA,) but I also don’t want to have to skip games. The opening line was listed as 4½, which would have been close enough to the eventual spread to work, but I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a spread listed as “OFF” before so I didn’t know what to do.

As for my poor showing this week, I was caught completely unaware about most of them. I still think the Texans, Jets, Eagles, Saints, Steelers, and Panthers were solid picks. They should all have not only covered, but won outright.

[Chris Berman]That’s why they play the games.[/CB]

Although I concede that my over/under picks this week were about as thoughtful as flipping a coin.

After some discussion and further review, it’s not nearly as clear as you want to make it out to be.

He didn’t jump straight up, and get pushed out. His momentum was clearly headed out of bounds. A good, and maybe lucky receiver does indeed make that play - but you can’t make a judgement call based on what a good receiver can do when he’s lucky.

It’s entirely possible his elbow or hand would’ve come down out of bounds before his second foot landed.

When there’s ambiguity in the call, you simply can’t award the offense a TD. As it is, the pushout rule is rarely invoked - that call probably gets called that way more than 75% of the time. As it should.

I’d be in favor of eliminating that rule entirely. Either the receiver lands inbounds, or he doesn’t. Remove the judgement call, place the onus on the receiver and quarterback to make a reception that doesn’t leave them vulnerable to pushouts.

Well, they’d be awarding a huge chance to win by fiat if they called it the other way. You can’t call a football game by ‘he might’ve done it, if he was really good’. If the Jets get that call, and win the game, then a much larger injustice of officiating has been created than what actually happened - if that was an injustice at all.

Turns out you’re half right. You picked the right deciding factor, but picked the wrong side.

By whom? Got a link?

Mostly a few threads on the board at scout.browns.com - I don’t have a specific link handy, just read a bunch of them. You might think it’s biased, but most Browns fans felt like it was likely he was going to land inbounds, and that we got a lucky call.

But you can watch the video highlights on nfl.com, or a video cap on the jets scout board.

When he caught the ball, he’d turned to facing his left side - his right foot was clearly going to land inbounds, but his momentum was carrying his left foot, facing out of the end zone, forwards and away from the ground rather than towards it. His whole body was clearly on a path outside of the endzone. Whether he could’ve gotten that left foot down without being hit is questionable - the momentum of his leg, and his body as a whole, was against it. An elbow might’ve hit first.

I would say it’s closer to 50/50 than clear either way. But even if it’s 75/25 in favor of the Jets player, you simply can’t award a game-tying touchdown based on what you think he’d probably do. In that situation, the burden is on the offense to execute - and officials are going to call it that way the vast majority of the time. They tend not to call late stage, game changing plays based on a questionable technicality (same with pass interference and other judgement calls) unless it’s completely clear, which this wasn’t. So, the call was consistent with how the NFL typically calls this sort of thing. And the right thing, for the spirit of the game, really - the pushout rule, which is a crappy rule anyway, should only be invoked if a pushout altered what otherwise would’ve clearly been a valid play (such as if they jump straight up, and it’s clear they’d otherwise come straight down), not when it’s questionable whether he’d have come down without it.

I maintain that calling it the other way would’ve been against general nfl precedent, against the spirit of the rules, and generally crappy. There’s no way it’s fair to award a game based on “he probably would’ve…” unless that probably is 95%+, and even then, it’s a crappy rule.

When “most” of the Browns fans discussing it agree it was a bad call, that’s compelling evidence that it was indeed a bad call.

Of the pundits I saw discussing it, only Mike Greenberg is an admitted Jets fan. He has maintained all along it was a bad call, but before finishing the breath he always points out that he doesn’t want to hear any whining because the Jets didn’t deserve to win. Mike Golic – his broadcast partner who doesn’t care a whit about the Jets – has steadfastly maintained that it was a horrible call, and that part of football is getting wins you don’t deserve, so he thinks the Jets got royally screwed. Mike & the Mad Dog – neither of whom are Jets fans, though not openly antagonistic toward them as they are the Giants – said it was a bad call. The other ESPN guys I saw comment on it unanimously either said it was a bad call or laughed about how bad it was include Sean Salisbury, Mike Ditka, Eric Allen, and Linda Cohn.

I have no need to watch the video again, as I’ve seen it countless times already. (Which is good considering I’m on dialup.) It was a textbook example of what a force-out is intended to be. They could show it in officials training sessions it was so clear. Much less clear was the force-out call later that same day in the Cowboys game. I’ve seen Amani Toomer get force-out calls much murkier than that one.

As for it being late in the game so the officials swallow their whistles, the NFL prides itself (though it isn’t always successful) in calling the game the same way regardless of the situation. That’s in stark contrast to basketball and hockey; there are no “make-up” calls, nor is there a tendency to not call something because the game is on the line. Not calling the force-out in that spot was against everything the NFL stands for regarding their officiating.

IMO, your assessment is completely wrong. His momentum wasn’t carrying him anywhere near out of bounds. He was less than a foot off the ground and heading down, and he was more than a foot away from the sideline. No way in hell was he going to land out of bounds.

As for the rule itself, I agree it’s a bit stupid in theory, but while it’s on the books I’d like to see it enforced properly. It’s too bad Buddy Horton ran across the field and overruled the official standing right there who called it as a force-out. Buddy must’ve been worried the fans would start throwing beer bottles.

I wouldn’t say that. I’d say the textbook example would be someone jumping straight up for a ball, then being pushed out during their jump. Because that would be unambiguous and clear where they’d land.

I’m not saying he’d have clearly been out - just that it’s not clearly certain - and if it’s not clearly certain, a game shouldn’t be awarded based on it.

I know the call-the-game-the-same thing is the official stance, but practically, you get a lot of judgement call non-calls in the last few minutes of a hotly contested game. I remember a game in 2004 with the Browns against the Ravens where Ray Lewis COMPLETELY TACKLED our tight end while the ball was in the air heading for him, resulting in an nfl record setting touchdown return by Ed Reed. It was completely blatant, but it was the last play of the game, or close to it, so it went uncalled. It also may have gone uncalled because the NFL doesn’t call penalties on Ray Lewis, either because they want him to be a star, or they’re afraid of getting the shiv.

He turned sideways so that he was facing the side of the endzone when he made the catch - an awkward angle for body control. He was starting to fall towards his right, meaning that his left foot was actually moving away from the ground, not towards it, and because of his momentum, he had little way of stopping that. If his shoulder, wrist, or elbow touched first - which was very much a possibility - it probably would’ve landed out of bounds.

I don’t think that’s correct, but I’m not sure. The sideline judge standing near the endzone pylon, IIRC, called it in incomplete pass immediately. I didn’t see an official on screen that called it a catch, and I was definitely looking.

So, um… I think the Pats are going to win this weekend.

Anyone agree?

Absolutely. Rock beats scissors. Scissors beat paper last week, and paper beat rock a few weeks ago. (Patriots=rock, Colts=scissors, Broncos=paper.)

I’ll agree with your complaint about that Ravens game. That was either “don’t piss off Ray-Ray” or “let the league’s pet projects shine.”

Happen to hear Colin Cowherd’s breakdown of Manning vs. Brady with respect to weather?

Short version: when it gets chilly, Brady thrives while Manning dies. The expected temperature in Foxboro at kickoff? About 40 degrees.

The Pats in a walk.

So I wake up today and flick on the TV to see the Falcons playing the Bengals in HD. I panicked thinking I’d forgotten there was a Saturday game today. In my tired and hungover haze I forgot that these teams played last week. There’s not really a point to this but I felt the need to share it with you.

Incidentally, did you see the Illini-Buckeyes game? I’ve never been big on moral victories but damn if that didn’t feel good. The Illini might just amount to something in a year or two. I forget what it’s like to actually have a college team to cheer for.

On with this weeks picks.

Sunday, Nov. 5
**ST. LOUIS 2 Kansas City 48 **
Here are a couple of teams that have consistently over or under performed. Against one opponent they look great and against another they lay an egg, often contrary to what you’d expect against a given opponent. They are both two teams that play well at home and terrible on the road. This week that favors St Louis in a big way. However they are off a game in which San Diego, a team with a very similar attack, gouged them for 280 yards on the ground. Toss in the fact that Damon Huard could be auditioning to be the permanent starter in his last certain start. He’s looked golden so far and another multi-TD, 300+ yard performance might keep Green on the bench. (Note: Herm is a idiot and insanely loyal so Green will probably start regardless of what Huard does, but he might not know this and has every reason to be perfect here.) KC has their defensive flaws too though, and the secondary is exhibit A. This plays to the Rams assets and both offenses are liable to explode. I’ve been getting burned by Huard and the Chiefs repeatedly this season, this week will probably be no different. Still, I’ll take those points and fantasy stud LJ to control this game. Though it might not be a bad week to start Steven Jackson and Mark Bulger either.

The Pick: Chiefs, Over

**BALTIMORE 3 Cincinnati 40½ **
So CJ calls out Ray-Ray. Now, that’s a pretty dumb thing to do and Ray was pretty entertaining in his response but I can’t help but wish CJ would get a clean shot at him on a crackback. I know I’m not the only one. I waffled on backing Billick last week because it was his first week back with the reins in his hands and he made me look dumb. He got the running game going somewhat by sheer doggedness and McNair pieced together a solid game. Cincy’s defense took a beating last week versus the Falcons but there’s only one Vick. The Bengals have had success against the Ravens in recent years but those were against a banged up version missing some defensive studs. I’m expecting a low scoring affair, the Bengals will make a few plays but so will the Ravens defense. The Bengals might have the best offense the Ravens have seen so far this year so it will be a good litmus test for them. Logically I think the Ravens are the pick here, but my gut tells me that Marvin Lewis has something up his sleeve for Billick and I’m not convinced the Ravens are for real yet.

The Pick: Bengals, Under

**N.Y. GIANTS 13 Houston 43 **
What the hell happened last week? The game wasn’t on TV but as I’m sitting there in the bar watching the crawl I see stats for Sage Rosenfels. Turns out Carr was benched immediately after I write a prediction highlighting the quietly impressive season Carr is having. Well, I’ll be damned if get burned by these guys again. Especially in the Meadowlands in the cold. Wali Lundy will have to be a horse to get them in this game, and that’s not likely. The real risk is that the Giants will play conservative and not cover, but Coughlin strikes as the kind of asshole who’ll run up the score.

The Pick: Giants, Under

**JACKSONVILLE 10 Tennessee 37½ **
Leftwich is going to be riding the pine for the indefinite future on the heels of a not-so-impressive 10-17, 87 yard performance from Gerrard. The Jags ran for 200+ yards last week against a decent Eagles defense and it could indicate a sea change for Del Rio’s gameplans. If they are going to be intent on pounding out victories on the ground they will have some real success against the Titans and their 31st run defense. Further helping the cause is the suspension of Pacman Jones leaving the Titans a man short versus those big WRs of the Jags. This will be the best defense (though they’ve not looked so hot as of late) that Vince Young will have faced and you should probably expect a few bad decisions to hurt his team. I’ll give the points, especially in Jacksonville.

The Pick: Jags, Under

**Dallas 3 WASHINGTON 42 **
I really want to pick the Redskins here. Romo was good last week but he’ll be playing in a tough environment on the road in FedEx field. It’s a perfect recipe for a huge letdown game. All the publicity and popsicle sucking he’s been getting this week has to have taken him off his focus. Add in the fact that the Redskins are coming off a bye week and have had ample time to dissect his game to find weaknesses. All that makes for a compelling case….but the Redskins suck. Specifically, their pass defense really sucks and probably won’t confound Romo. And the straw that breaks the camels back is the injury report which includes just about every meaningful player on the Redskin roster. I’m sure a few of them will be out and I expect the Cowboys defense to dominate the game from whistle to whistle, regardless of a Romo meltdown or not.

The Pick: Cowboys, Under

**BUFFALO 3½ Green Bay 40½ **
The Packers are probably the sexiest pick on the board this week. Every pundit I’ve seen is picking Favre to get them back to .500 starting a cavalcade of “Brett is Back” headlines. I’m not buying it. The Packers are without some key offensive players, Morency and Miree the biggest losses. Jennings might still be out as well. The Bills have a legitimate homefield advantage and the recent string of losses they’ve suffered were against a couple good teams. The Packers defense is pretty bad and McGahee and Losman could have good days this week. They have made some substantive changes over the bye week to improve their blocking and offense. I think the Pack’s rejuvenation will take a big hit this week.

The Pick: Bills, Over

**New Orleans 1 TAMPA BAY 38½ **
Sports Guy trotted out a stat that says the Bucs are 14-2-1 in their last 17 games as a home dog. Pretty compelling stuff, don’t you think? It tells you that opponents can sometimes be rattled in this environment and that the southern Florida heat might have an impact. Or else it tells you that stats can be really anomalous. The Saints shouldn’t be caught off guard by anything, these teams being so familiar and all. One has to wonder if the bloom is off the rose with them. Bush and Deuce are nursing injuries but both are expected to play against the Bucs NFC worst run defense. Gradkowski hasn’t recaptured the rhythm he showed in his first start, but they’ve won their last two home games against a pair of really good teams. I’m losing faith in the Saints outside the dome and with questions in the backfield they could struggle, but that Tampa run defense is too porous to trust.

The Pick: Saints, Over

**Atlanta 4½ DETROIT 47 **
Why is this spread so small? Hasn’t everyone been talking about how Vick is starting to click in that offense? The Lions passing game will have some success against a iffy Falcon secondary and their defense isn’t going to get completely embarrassed but every other measure favors the Falcons heavily. Most importantly it just feels like a blowout in the making.

The Pick: Falcons, Over

**CHICAGO 13 Miami 37½ **
Do I like the Bears in this one? I’ll pretend I didn’t hear that….you should be ashamed.

The Pick: Bears, Over

**Minnesota 5 SAN FRANCISCO 42½ **
The 49ers count on being able to run the ball for success and against the Vikings stout run defense that simply won’t happen. It’s a recipe for a very lopsided game. The Vikings offense hasn’t exactly been dominant this season but in San Fran they’ll do enough to win the game.

The Pick: Vikings, Under

**SAN DIEGO 12½ Cleveland 41½ **
Last week I did a little self analysis and determined that I’ve been for to conservative in my picks. I scan the board and realized I’ve gone with a string of 8 straight favorites to cover. Not a good sign, but I can’t in good conscience see any reason to put money on those dogs. Each faces a tough test and in most cases the points they are giving are totally manageable. I mention this now because I’m feeling like I need to make a couple reaches. This game’s large spread is the type of game you take that opportunity on, but still I have a really tough time betting against the Chargers at home. I mean look at the way they played last week. The Browns have a poor run defense and LDT is a good as they come. There’s a glimmer of hope in the fact that Merriman will be starting his suspension this week and it’s conceivable that his loss will throw this defense off it’s game allowing the Browns to muster enough points to cover. The Browns have only had one loss by more than 10 points this season. Frankly I’m just talking myself into it and I don’t believe it for a second. But sometimes you just have to roll the dice that this will be the one game closer than it should be.

The Pick: Browns, Over

**PITTSBURGH 2½ Denver 37 **
This is asinine. The Steelers have been terrible and they are favored over a dominant Denver squad? Here’s this week’s head scratcher. Last week it was the Jets game and we saw how that turned out, I’m hoping for better today.

The Pick: Broncos, Under

**NEW ENGLAND 3 Indianapolis 48 **
Here’s the big game of the week. It’s going to be exciting. Pats fans are just rabid that people are picking the Colts and forgetting that Belichick has basically owned the Colts. Manning got over the Foxboro monkey last season but he had a decent defense then. This year they can’t stop anyone made all the worse but injuries to a handful of key guys. That plays right into the hands of the Pats power running attack, it should be a good week to have Maroney in your fantasy lineup. Last week Manning pretty much single-handedly willed his team to victory over a Broncos team that had a similar favorable match-up. He’ll have to do one better this week because the Pats aren’t saddled with the likes of Jake Plummer. The guy they have is halfway decent you know. The irony would be fierce if the game came down to a Viniateri FG to decide it. I don’t think it’ll be that close, though as a viewer I hope I’m wrong.

The Pick: Patriots, Over

Monday, Nov. 6
SEATTLE 7½ Oakland 37½
This game isn’t going to be very interesting. How the hell did the Raiders get so many marquee games this season? I know a few people drank the kool-aid and figured them for 8 wins or so, but I’m not sure that warrants this may primetime spots. The Bears are practically getting ignored by the schedule makers and they had ever reason to expect success. Did they really think Aaron Brooks was the answer? Anyways, the Seahawks really need to get on track. The Raiders have played much better of the past couple weeks and have been hanging tough. Their offense has accomplished next to nothing though. Against a Hasselbeck and Alexander-less Seattle team they should be able to hang close. The Seahawks defense hasn’t been the force it was last year and if Wallace makes a couple mistakes thing could get very dicey for the Raiders. I’m inclined to think the Seahawks will win this game but the spread makes me hesitate, were it in Oakland it’d be an easy choice but in Seattle it could be a blow out. Frankly I have no idea. When in doubt, take the points I suppose.

The Pick: Raiders, Under

Little help?

I’m going to NYC next weekend and was hoping to land some tickets to the Bears v. Giants game. Haven’t been before and I was curious what to expect to pay to scalp and if you guys have suggestions of what the best avenue for getting tix is.

Ellis…anyone else?

I’ve been lazy about grading/scoring my bets, but I’ll get around to that soon. For now, I can’t possibly pass up the Pittsburgh line with my play money.

150 on Den +3
50 on NO -1