For some of you, this story may already be yesterday’s news. But I just discovered it, um, yesterday. The trainwreck has been all kinds of interesting to me.
The actual story starts with this essay: “Why I Make Terrible Decisions, or Poverty Thoughts”. As the title indicates, it’s one woman’s well-written explanation for why she does what she does, despite being poor.
Personally, while I wasn’t moved by what she wrote, I thought it painted a pretty realistic picture of how it sucks to be poor. My only criticism was that she’s obviously not nearly as nihilistic as her words would lead you to believe she is. Anyone who works two jobs while juggling a full course load obviously has some aspirations and motivation to do better. So she doesn’t seem like the best example of someone who has the “We will never be not poor” mentality. But otherwise, I didn’t have a problem with what she’d written.
As to be expected, some truths about Linda Tirado started coming to light as the media caught wind of the story. For one, she’s not really that poor. She describes herself as “comfortably working-class” and apparently owns her house outright. And she’s also from a comfortable middle-class upbringing, complete with private schooling and trips to Europe.
People didn’t know these things before they crowd-sourced her ~$60K. So now people are calling Tirado a scam-artist (and maybe some other horrible things).
I don’t know how I feel about this. Do I think Tirado exaggerated her first-hand experience with poverty? You betcha. And I think she knew exactly what effect her words would have on people. But she didn’t force anyone to give her money. She didn’t even solicit donations, at least not in the essay. People did this on their own. For all they knew, they were giving money to a drug addict or a child abuser. Or a child-abusing drug addict. Or a working-class stiff masquerading as poor people. People may have been fooled, but they allowed themselves to be fooled.
It would be one thing if this was the first time someone who goes “viral” is exposed as a fraud. But this seems to be a weekly event. Is it a cynical view to just presume that no one is how they first appear and act accordingly? I just assumed this was common sense, but apparently it’s not.
This rant is directed at anyone who is butthurt over being taken advantaged by this woman. It’s also directed at the people who keep vilifying this woman for stealing the money of the generous-hearted. Please. She tugged at people’s heart strings and they paid for the privilege. If they can’t do their due diligence and find out if a person is up-and-up before giving them money, then they deserve to be scammed.