Well, now I’m all confused re this chick’s hair. Is she wearing a wig at her trial?
She’s plain, not ugly. Or is there now a PC word for plain, in case a plain person’s feelings are hurt by complete strangers discussing her (very) public sex life and the incredible fact that it exists at all on a message board unknown to her? Does she still retain the right to respect after this episode? Who cares?
And her partner’s no prize, either. As Dr House says, “3s date 3s; 6s date 6s.” Neither of these people would be considered a class act, IMO. YMMV.
And here I am, just for shits and giggles…
Eh, I don’t think she’s that ugly. Looks like the standard overweight middle-aged woman to me. I think it’s the thought of her having vigorous, noisy sex that’s causing people to react negatively. T.V. has taught us that only beautiful people are allowed to have sex.
Where did you come up with this: Only beautiful people are allowed to have sex? Seriously? :dubious:
Again, the complaints and derision re this couple are due to their loud and obnoxious behavior, not their degree of attractiveness. Of course, goofing on their less than obvious appeal is also some (minor) fun, but I don’t see the leap in logic from that to “only beautiful people are allowed to have sex. The TV has taught us that.”
Frankly, I don’t care what they’re doing behind closed doors. I just don’t want to HEAR it. I don’t want to hear you having sex or my neighbors or my pets or whatever. Their neighbors and the court apparently felt the same way.
I don’t think she’s THAT ugly. But she does kind of remind me of Margaret Perrin for some reason. (And probably saner)
Like eleanorigby said, she’s just kind of blah. Average But people expect someone who makes that kind of noise and gets in the news to be a total sex goddess. (I do, however think she needs a more flattering haircut. That might be part of the problem)
OK in the other articles elmwood posted she looks better. No supermodel, mind, but the first article photo made her look like a botched Male-to-Female TG. They’re still showboating jackasses that were annoying their neighbors with their antics.
Yeah, but it’s form or function, rigster. I mean, lookswise they frankly deserve each other, agreed, but it’s now been officially established that they enthusiastically beat the mattress for several hours every day, and I for one will wait until I’m gettin’ half as much before I come back and snark on them. Dare I say “go thou and do likewise”?
Considering the topic, it would make sense to include an audio track as well. I guess it would be easiest to just make it a video. And would it kill you to at least consider the mise en scéne?
Oh, sure, and have you criticize my feng shui? Bugger that. I’ll do it in front of a bluescreen and put select scenes from better porn in the background.
Well, a strategically placed mirror might improve the flow of your chi, eh, wink’s as good as a nudge, eh, say no more.
When a case like this gets to court, I suspect that there is some town house warfare going on.
I have a co-worker who revels in tormenting his neighbor with loud music at odd hours almost as much as he revels in relating the stories. He’s admitted that he can’t remember what started the feud and that he does it for his own enjoyment now.
No doubt this woman is getting more than I am (interesting, BTW, that the focus is on the woman’s vocalizations even though the man was pretty noisy too), however, I suspect that the real issue was a purposeful attempt to rile the neighbors.
I suspect there is an element of willful exhibitionism in it - in that these folks probably get off on having their neighbours hear them screw. They must on some level enjoy the attention.
