Not for Amy

great… now I have the term “feltching field” filed away in my brain… thanks a lot Uke! :frowning:
…and… if you are blowing instead of sucking to you get really long lasting bubbles?

So hands up who thinks that Wally is really proud of us all .

ducking brick that made it all the way across the pond

FYI, that term is much older than any Richard Gere legends. As a matter of fact I’d never heard anything about it attributed to Gere, I’d heard the gay and gerbil legends, but I think snopes just tossed the felching on to ice the cake.

Amy, I’m beginning to like you more, you go against the grain, and don’t listen to advice of others. Bravo, no just wait until college when you really learn and try some new things ;).

Listening to the chills rattle Wally’s spine

felching has been going on for quite some time. and ejaculating into the rectum is not necessary. i had a girlfriend once who wanted to lick my anus. sorry, just wasn’t gonna happen. i don’t go there, with anything. no chance, no way. don’t mind if you do it, just don’t attempt it with me, no way pal, uh-uh!

:stuck_out_tongue:

gross.

Pun intended, I assume?

Soulsling,

Sorry, pal, but felching sans-ejaculate is nothing more than common, every day rimming.

Er. . . I mean . . . Oh, hell.

ha!

knew i’d get someone.
well tymp, you’re a rimmer huh?

no, kidding aside, i realize there’s a technical difference, either way, IT WILL NOT HAPPEN TO ME. :stuck_out_tongue:

so, can i call you rimmer? and i don’t refer to the guy from red dwarf.

I am probably going to regret asking but I have to know…

What is Tea bagging? :confused:

ok, now you’ve done it… forced me to get references. In other words, if I’m wrong, DAMNIT I’m taking the L.A. Times down with me!

http://www.kiwi-magic.com/humour/rood/gerbil.htm

That is the definition I’ve always heard for ‘felching’.
What you guys (and apparently a whole assload of gay porn sites that came up on my search results – pun intended) are describing sounds a lot like snowballing to me…

I was planning on having beef stroganoff for dinner, and you folks had to go and ruin it for me. Thanks a lot.

-dook

Flypsyde said:

Flyp doesn’t tell you it was as good for him as it was for me, however :smiley:

Seriously now (damn wine is messing with my head, I suppose): Amy, this is not true. Back in the day, I suppose I posted one felching joke too many (manny, even. Another in-joke). Since then, people have been directing newbies towards me as their Felchers Anonymous Information Booth. This is either a good joke or a downright lie, however!

Straight as an arrow, with no desire to withdraw right after making a deposit. So to speak. And I’m not even going into the front yard/back yard thing here either :wink:

Amy,

When dad asks you what you were doing, and threatens to suspend your computer privileges, just remember to tell him

“But I thought the purpose of the SDMB was to fight ignorance?” :wink:

Of course, ignorance can occasionally be bliss. Ignorance of this concept is one example.

And, if there’s anyone left viewing this thread, perhaps you can explain to me two things that I don’t know about:

  1. I’ve seen the phrase, “sent to Coventry” used with respect to trolls. While I think I’ve got the general idea of what it means, what’s the derivation of this term?

  2. What in the world is a “chick tract”? Do I want to know? (I suppose it would help if I had a SO.)

DRY, chick tracts are small pamphlets expounded fundamentalist christian doctrines as imagined by one Jack T. Chick.

You can find samples here.

http://www.chick.com

Since we’re discussing homosexual practices, I’ll point you to one sample chick tract, The Gay Blade.

As far as “sent to Coventry”, I’ve found this explanation:

«Since the seventeenth century, to send to Coventry has meant “to ostracize,” but it isn’t clear why. One story claims the phrase arose because Royalist prisoners were sent to Coventry (a Parliamentary stronghold) during the British civil war, but a competing explanation says the phrase stems from the fact that townspeople in Coventry were once so antimilitary that soldiers sent there were treated as complete outcasts.»

It’s…uh, pretty obvious that I put the wrong interpretation on “chick”.

In my defense, it did seem that it was mostly women who mentioned this term on the SDMB…sigh

(By the way, since I’m at work, I’m glad I didn’t “pull a Wally” (SDMB term of art, huh?) and have some partner at my law firm walk up right when I was viewing the “Gay Chick Tract”. (Not that they’d have a problem with my orientation–or a mistaken perception of it–it’s just that they think I’m weird enough already)

As to Coventry, I’m pretty up on English History from the Norman Conquest through around Henry VIII, and wasn’t aware of any special significance. Figures it was later…

Arnold:

Thanks for the link to The Gay Blade! That was one of the wildest Chicks I’ve ever seen.

And that dark-haired rugmuncher near the end was pretty hot (the one who’s calling “Come back!” to the comely blonde, who’s fleeing her evil grasp). I’m surprised that Chick’s crack team of illustrators got away with that one.

Am I the only one who read that tract and realized all the possible connotations of “the homosexuals wearied themselves, trying to find the door”?

I love the way they put “Sexually” in brackets, as if thats what that guy actually said…

Did anyone else notice the “Recruitment bit” slung in?

The tract WAS pretty hilarious, but the charm of felching still eludes me.

It’s too much like, I dunno, cleaning up afterwards. Wearisome rather than erotic. I also keep getting the mental image of birds throwing up into their babies’ gullets, for some reason.

There’s a line in the movie “StepMom” (Julia Roberts/Susan Sarandan) that makes a reference to snowblowing… anyone know what snowblowing is? And we still don’t have an answer to Tea-bagging. Ummm, maybe I don’t wanna know, I think that learning what felching means was enough for one day!

I think you’ve gotten yourself a UL there, dook.

That is not a link to the LA Times, that is a link to a humor site claiming the story is from the LA Times. If you contact the Times, I doubt any trace of that story would be found. Here’s why I think so:

“At a hushed press conference, a hospital spokesman described what happened next.” I don’t think so. Doctors cannot divulge information about their patients w/out the patients’ permission. Would you give permission if this were true? And what is this ‘hospital spokesperson’s’ name. A newspaper would site the name of the source, since he is the hospital spokesperson holding a press conference, his name would not be a secret.

And if this happened in Salt Lake City, where the press conference was held, why is the source from the LA Times? I’ll also bet there’s no news reports about this incident in Salt Lake City also.

And ‘The Salt Lake City Hostpital?’ I’m not from Salt Lake City, so if anyone is, please correct me, but I’ve never seen a hospital named after the city in which it is located. You ever hear of New York City Hospital or Chicago Hospital? I did a search on the internet and could not find a hospital of that name.

I can come up with something I think is funny, add some names to it, etc, then pass it thru email with the heading, “Actual story from the St Louis Post Distpatch” after a while, it will end up on someone’s humor page after it has been forwarded so many times that the original author cannot be found.

I wonder if there’s a chick-tract about felching?