Notes from the NY Not In Our Name Protest:

Go to the MPSIMS list of threads. At the top you’ll see mods’ names. cCick on them, and a box will appear giving their e-mail addresses.

And there’s yet more dirt on some of her “friends.”

I knew she had taken money from CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations), but I didn’t know that:

[ul]
[li]CAIR’s communications director refused to condemn OBL’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks.[/li][li]CAIR board members have blamed Israeli and Egyptian officials for the 1993 WTC bombing.[/li][li]Federal Prosecutor Mary Jo White claimed that a CAIR former board member was a possible conspirator in the 1993 bombing.[/li][/ul]

And Skip already mentioned her crooked electioneering. She’s under investigation for six counts of alleged election law violations. The Georgia BoE has voted unanimously twice that the state take action on all six counts.

It must be because all of her opponents are racist. Right?

And since I’m bored at lunch, here’s another gem from this thread.

We have the following analysis from spoke:

To which Ace replies:

And yet now Ace asks:

Jeez, Ace, you posted your agreement with spoke on August 23 of this year. Did you already join the:

club yet?

Maeglin, I’m very familiar with Mr. Zell Miller, thanks. “Certainly no liberal!?” Please.

He’s a D.I.N.O – since we’re apparently in patronizing mode today, that’s Democrat In Name Only and he’s the biggest one there is. Votes with the Pubbies on all the major issues. Campaigns against the Democrats right and left – I dismiss his credibility in this debate.

He’s so nearly a Republican, he and Jonah Goldberg could swap places, and the only one who’d notice would be Jonah’s mom, Lucianne.

As for the substance, I honestly don’t see “poison” in association. To refresh, DCU was attempting to prove that she was full of “poisonous” rhetoric. That’s yet to be advanced beyond the ten-yard line.

Turning to you, you make your first substantive complaint about her character, something that requires slightly different evidence, under Crooked Electioneering. Let’s have some more of that, first-hand please. Link?

Calling Denise Majette a “Tomette” doesn’t get past the ten-yard line for poisonous rhetoric?

Accepting a campaign visit from Louis Farrakhan, who called Hitler a “very great man,” is not a poisonous association?

How can you tolerate such evil on the left when you are so intolerant of it on the right?

Ask and ye shall receive.

From this article:

And:

Ace, obviously you consider race-baiting to be mere mau-mauing. I consider it poisonous. I suspect others would agree. Ditto on the 9/11 comments.

Ace0Spades, since your opening post is not Great Debates material . . . let’s just close this one. You’re welcome to open a new thread in GD.


Cajun Man - SDMB Moderator