And yet you went to college:
This thread is ace. “Free girl” - brilliant.
Damn you Antinor, I came in to post this. Shakes fist
Younger brother, is this you? Actually it’s not, because my younger brother doesn’t earn even that much money, but manages to live on the streets.
Of course, he restricts himself to using free computers and eating at homeless shelters/missions/etc.
I don’t see the debate here.
You think that your greatest responsibility is to turn around the life of a drug-addicted hooker? How about turning around the life of a sex-addicted homeless man?
First sentence in the OP, and wrong already. I don’t need a woman, and neither does my partner.
Oh, and we both know how to spell “to”.
Well, if you’re that way then that’s yo business. I have no desire for a man so thats completely not an option
Does a women need a man?
I’m not 4 sure, but I do know that women have more sexual patience than men
This is a wonderful thread, and clearly the break that the McCain campaign has been waiting for.
Oho you’re not getting me with that one. Between the Tibet in my backyard and the Nelson Mandela in my bathtub, I don’t have room for any more “free” stuff.
OTOH, I was thinking that maybe I’d get a maid - find a place nearby for her to stay. Just someone to keep my house clean, fix my meals and go away.
You’re welcome. I paid about $1000 out of pocket over 4 years for nursing school at a community college. That’s 3 months of masturbation for you.
But the question is if female hookers have more sexual patients.
Does anyone know the client ratio between male and female prostitutes?
Yes, but was it as good for them as it was for you?
This a fish needs a good hard fucking.
Wait, what?
I love it when u talk dirty. 
As Og is my witness, I read this as ‘mediation’. Accompanied by a settlement with no admission of liability.
In your experience, you mean. Not that I’m disagreeing with your example.
He’s probably done more for Red Light districts than the development of the energy efficient bulb.
This is really what it boils down to. Except that, from the OP’s point of view, it’s not necessarily a “problem”. He appears to think of women primarily as a commodity, and for people with such a viewpoint, paying for them is indeed probably the most appropriate way to go… certainly the most forthright.
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a small fortune is clearly going to need to budget half his income on hookers.
I had no idea that a man trying to spell out his reasoning for spending half of his money on escorts would be such a hot topic.
Ah, screw it, it’s Friday!
Is that like what they do with cows, except this is the urban version?
“With less udders!”
Please!
*Fewer *udders.