Holly Shit! It’s a talking horse!!
As I noted in Shag’s thread, it’s not a full topic ban. He can’t start threads on women but he’s free to contribute to threads started by others. So poking him in that thread just prolongs things and gives him more excuses to keep it going.
He’s not the only talking animal. This place is a goddam zoo!
So my opinion isn’t valid because I haven’t been here as long? Gee, thanks. I’m glad to hear spinky is a fine person, but you have to admit, it looks weird.
Remember, when a person’s first name is Crazy, you need not take them real serious.
I guess we’ll just have to wait and see if spinky says anything else.
No, tenure has nothing to do with knowing whats up in general. In this case I just mean your opinion isn’t valid because it’s wrong. But the reason for that, I’m guessing, is that he hasn’t posted for much of your entire time here so you have no context to judge by unless you go back and read a bunch of 10 year old threads.
Assuming he doesn’t get completely banned there will surely be new reasons to pit him in the future so he’s going to get to post one way or the other.
A rule that prevents him from starting threads on certain subjects but not posting to them isn’t going to eliminate the possibility of him trolling. But he could still get warned for trolling even if he didn’t start the thread. So any stick poke may give him a free pass to be a douche or it may give him a chance to get himself banned entirely.
What I notice is that, after an all-too-brief respite, we now have THREE threads featuring Shagnasty’s posting practices. :smack:
I’m counting the minutes until the one in ATMB is closed. Once Shag posted in it, there’s only one direction it can go.
And he managed to post with the same level of whining that made him famous.
In the ATMB thread he went off about his women then he deleted it. He’s pissed his Russian girlfriend is 50. A copy of that deleted post could be found if you knew where to look - you know, over there.
Can we stop fucking talking about him here, please? He’s got enough threads devoted to him.
And our friendly righties have started a thread in MPSIMS about how evil people on the left are for insulting people on the right.
Then of course, CCitizen has to say that Republicans have every right to respond in kind, but liberals are so evil that he thinks every sane man must support Trump. :smack:
Yup, Republican please. You whine about being insulted and fact checked on this board and then start and carry a thread excusing your own insults as being your right, but the left is evil for insulting you.
Grow. The. Fuck. Up.
What does your post have to do with trolls or trolling, Snowie?
If you are referring to this, you need to work on comprehending stuff.
I think eschereal has a point, Chimera. That thread was started last November by Richard Parker, who doesn’t strike me as particularly reactionary. And CCitizen’s reanimation of it last night seems to be coming from the perspective of, if not an MRA, at least an anti-feminist who sees a Lorena Bobbitt-wannabe under every bed (for all that he seems to feel obligated to include a #NotAllFeminists disclaimer).
Weren’t they one of those one hit wonders who didn’t deserve to be?
Batguano may well deliver here.