On Nicole Kidman

My god, she’s *only *40! Give it ten more years, at the very least. She’s had way too much work done for her age; the excessive Botoxing, for one, is obviously making her look unnatural. She’s got a great foundation and could age very gracefully if she’d let stop mucking up the works.

Heck, look at Kim Cattrall: hardly any work done at all and she’s eleven years older and looks fabulous!

My wife was startled when we were watching Bewitched, a lighthearted comedy, together, and I suddenly blurted out: “Tom Cruise is a fool!.” With a level of emotion surprising e’en unto myself.

It matters not what day I joined the queue.

It’s my thread and I’m first, right?

Very pretty to look at, I’ll give you that.

But the work is starting to show, in a certain unnaturalness in the features, and a face that is looking somewhat frozen.

Her acting, however I find really lacking. She seems to lack emotion and depth, it all just comes across as wooden somehow. And it’s always just more of the same, I’m bored with it myself.

But pretty to look at, (for now).

I’ve thought Kidman was a good actress since To Die For. She acted circles around Cruise in Eyes Wide Shut, even though she had about a tenth of the screen time.