From what I gather from the OP, they are:
The OP’s at his/her friend’s place, as is the friend’s sister.
In my opinion, if they aren’t skilled enough to avoid detection they deserve to have their fun spoiled…
Hey, I’ll bet some of us hear “Ride of the Valkyries” every time it becomes clear that we’re about to get some! Dun-dada-dunh-dunh! Dun-dada-dunh-DUNH! Dun-dada-DUNH-DUNH! Dun-dada-DA!
“INCOMING!!!”
LC
I’m a little surprised at the MYOB attitude here.
- ravesaint is the chaperone here.
- It sounds as though the parents, were they there and aware of what was going on would have broken things up.
If I had a teenager and left him/her under the supervision of someone trusted, I would hope that they would enforce my rules and not be more allowing just because it’s “not their business.” It is ravesaint’s business, being the adult in charge.
I too must side with ravesaint on this matter. If it were my little sister (by blood or otherwise) I would be putting the kabosh on what was going on as well. If they want to do the nasty, then so be it, but their skills need to rise above groping on the couch and they need to come up with another place/another time.
Since ravesaint was in charge, it was his duty to put a stop to it. Sorry, but most teenagers don’t understand the implications of sex, and unless otherwise noted we can assume the same for his sister and boyfriend.
Just my two coppers.
As far as I can tell, ravesaint’s position of “in charge” was self appointed at best. There is no statement that anyone in authority suggested that he was responsible for anything, least of all the daughter of the house’s behavior.
Prom Night: Might we infer that the girl is 17 or 18 years old? It’s her house not your house? It’s not your sister? MYOB!