Online Dating - meeting someone in person for the first time

A question inspired by the current online dating thread:

I’ve seen the sentiment frequently expressed that it’s quite possible that you can feel sparks with a person online/over the phone but then feel nothing in person. I just want to hear some specific examples. Back when I used to do online dating, I rarely had super strong feelings toward someone I’d just started talking to. I can think of two instances where I really did feel a strong pull to someone I hadn’t met, and in both instances, I talked to the guy for months before meeting him. And in both those circumstances, the idea of an in-person meeting killing the feelings was silly because the feelings were based on personality and conversation, which can usually be estimated through phone conversations and messages.

So I’m just trying to hear more about this experience frequently spoken of that I’ve never had. Do some people just feel that “this is the one” spark much faster than I do, and erroneously? Do some people meet people so physically revolting that it completely negates any connection in terms of personality? Just want to hear some personal stories and explanations, please. Thanks!

I’ve only had it happen once, out of at least eight online-dating interactions that did eventually lead to meeting in person. (Of the remaining seven, there was one where she kind of had that reaction upon meeting me).

It’s important to put it into context: there could be 15 email exchanges and phone calls in which things were heating up and then a conversation take place that made me feel like pulling back and not thinking of that person as warmly. So the fact that it can happen when you meet someone face to face doesn’t entirely mean it’s all about the difference between online + phone communication and face to face communication — it can just be that that’s the situation y’all were in when the intimacy-destroying conversation took place.

Generally by the time folks decide to meet in person, they’re interested in hanging out for a longer stretch of uninterrupted / ongoing interaction than they’d had via emai or phone. That may not be true for everyone (I had chat sessions of over an hour occasionally and some folks I know do telepone calls of over two hours) but I think it’s a fair generalization. First in-person date can be dinner and the rest of the evening. Not always, but it’s likely to be a quantum leap in the amount of interaction that takes place.

That means there’s a lot of opportunity for something to take a different tack when you do.

The other factor mostly applies to email compared to non-written (and would perhaps apply to telephone as well as in-person): some people are fascinating and intriguing when they write, when they have time to shape their sentences carefully, and come across very differently when it just has to spew out of their mouth in real time.

The thing is, when you get together with someone and decide to keep seeing each other, you’re most likely going to have the balance of your communication be in person from then on. So if the interaction is hot and exciting via email (and perhaps also phone) but far less so when together for an evening in person, it’s not like you’re going to shrug and think “Well, we should just go back to emailing, that was hot”. I mean, I suppose folks could but realistically we don’t. The exception would be when you’re flirting with someone two states away and in-person togetherness is going to be somewhat rarified no matter what happens. Even then, the romance is about the imagined face-to-face encounters and if they’re not so good that’s going to take the zing out.

I’ve never, ever had it be the case that it was lack of in-person electricity that did us in. The one that went sour on me did so because she seemed standoffish, flaky, distracted, not very present for the interaction, whereas when she wrote, she was bubbling over with rapid thoughts and vivid interests. The other one I mentioned where it was the other person who decided “naah, not for me” when we met in person, she said specifically that I seemed younger in person than my chronological age and she was already 8 years older than me, and in person it definitely mattered a lot and ruled out things going anywhere.

Poor personal hygiene - negates a whole lot of what good conversation creates.

People lie.

I met my wife online. I had a very strong sense of this being substantively different than people I’d dated online in the previous couple of years. At the risk of stealth bragging, I had no trouble finding as many dates as I wanted and could afford to be selective. So not an insignificant sample for comparison on initial contact and subsequent feelings of attraction/connection.

Sometimes, you just know.

That said, there were dates that I knew would be fun but go nowhere long term. Dates that I went on because I was bored and just felt like being out and socializing. Dates that I regretted because I didn’t trust my intuition. Dates for the sake of going somewhere new and having a few drinks. And dates where I was just feeding my ego.

That’s the main disadvantage of online dating. You build up an image or idea of what someone is like and then, when you meet them, poof, it goes down like a house of cards.

If I am to date someone I want it to be someone I had met for the first time by meeting in person right from the start. The whole picture all at once from the outset.

IMO what often gets in the way of accurately judging compatibility is not so much the other person lying, as much as people projecting their hopes and needs onto someone they don’t know much about, filling in the resulting blank spaces with how they would like that person to be. On meeting they discover the date is actually a real human being with their own personality, not the invented perfect match, so everything comes crashing down. Often done this myself in the past.