Online Dating Tropes

I like this. I may have to investigate it.

Hey, how’s it goin’, eh? :slight_smile:

Hey I sell drugs out of my house, always use hand sanitizer before groping a woman, only try to screw girls over 16 and less than 300 pounds, and rarely consume more than 6-8 shots of whiskey before lunch. I’m in!

Say curvy, and post a full-body shot in an outfit that you think makes you look good.

“I’m shy at first but then I’m not”? (usually worded less stupid than that)

“Looking for a man who knows how to treat a lady right”

Just because some curvy people are fat doesn’t mean you can’t be curvy as well. :slight_smile:

I never mentioned drama in my profile, but if I liked someone after a few conversations, I would ask them what they meant about drama. And, yes, it was often just a phrase to ward off weirdos.

The corollary: If you find someone you like, and your profile says No drama, but theirs doesn’t, you say, “I see you didn’t mention not wanting drama. Does that mean you like drama?”:smiley:

I always thought the correct term for that trick was called the Fat Girl Angle Shot:

[http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Fat_Girl_Angle_Shot](http:// encyclopediadramatica.com/Fat_Girl_Angle_Shot)

Thanks for the NSFW link.

Encyclopedia Dramatica is always, always NSFW. Unfortunately, it’s not like it’s a commonly known site.

What she said. The page itself is okay but the banner ads are not. Also, encyclopaediadramatica has serious malware issues.

There’s at least one side-by-side “overhead shot vs. the real thing” down the page a little that is NSFW though hard to see at a distance (topless photo).

Yeah, to me the “MySpace angle” just means tilting the camera off from plumb because you think it makes you look artsy.

Before the FGAS and MySpace angles made it big (pun unintended), there was the Glamour Shot (the big hair and huge cowboy hats made chubby faces seem smaller by comparison), posing behind large dogs or bushes, blurry shots from hundreds of feet away, and posing with a group of much larger friends (image SFW, from a deleted spam post on the message board I run).

See, folks, this is why you just pick up slutty chicks in bars. Done.

I broke Chris Luongo’s link. Please remember we have the two-click rule here for all not-safe-for-work content … and remember to label such links as NSFW.

Ellen Cherry
IMHO Moderator

This. Yes. At least they’re up front about being high maintenance (“you’ll have to work to get to know me”), I guess.

On the flipside, men who think that if they use the word “lady” enough times they’ll get lucky: “I’m looking for that special lady,” “I always treat my ladies well,” etc.

There is absolutely no good reason for this, but I have always disliked “lady” when it’s used that way. Completely turns me off.

This is only slightly a trope–not looking for a green card–or whatever the phrase is

I used online dating for about 4 months and by pure accident met my now wife. But I had 2 more months of membership, so I changed my profile to try and maximize the e-mails. So I became a 70-yr-old surgeon looking for a wife from any country to spend my last few years of life with. That worked exactly as you would predict. I also did one where I came across as an awful criminal and even got some hits on that one. But after 2-3 days of that the fun was over, so I closed the account.

I almost forgot about The Obvious Scammer. Usually it’s an ad from someone claiming to be a single white female in their late 20s, with a generic profile that includes no references to the city where she lives, a few photos that depicts someone a bit too good looking to be true, and a desired age range that is unusually broad - 18-60 or something similar.

One time I set up my profile as a fetus. Literally, a fetus in a jar sitting in a lab somewhere. I explained that it would be hard to reply in a timely fashion because my arms weren’t completely developed yet and it’s difficult to type.

I got a number of serious replies to that one.

When you break a link for being NSFW, could you leave a note in that post? Right now, it just looks like he screwed up the coding rather than broken to meet the 2-click rule.