Pit rules have been revised

I asked a question. Here’s the thread. Boom: Banned. Zotti never publicly acknowledged that he had banned me, and the title under my name never changed from “Charter Member”.

A couple of days later he (or somebody) changed my unjustified banning to an unwarranted suspension for a couple more days. Zotti owes me an apology, but I’m not holding my breath.

Two posters reinstated, one stays banned - About This Message Board - Straight Dope Message Board

That doesn’t sound much like the replies that I received in this thread; witch is troubling because getting banned without warning seems to be the very thing that has gotten people so worked up over this issue.

So cursing at a plagiarist is verboten, while plagiarism is tolerated.

oops

If it really slows, there is one sure fire way to fix it. Get a mod to put LOTR in the subject line. That will get the thread over the top in no time.

PS. I WAS in the right place after all. what a maroon!:rolleyes:

For me, the irony is that I’ve spent way more time in Cafe Society or Great Debates than in the Pit, and have hardly ever called anybody a cunt.

In fact, after the last time I called Carol Stream a cunt, I decided it reflected badly on me and that I wouldn’t do it anymore. (Perhaps I should have simply taken the lesson that it’s pointless to address him or her at all. Though I do wonder if “Carol Stream” refers to the town in Illinois.)

But, I don’t accept Zotti determining what words I can use. It’s bad enough being given poorly-thought out instructions in service of bad policy by an incompetent administrator when I’m getting paid to be there. In the case of the SDMB, I’ve actually paid for the privilege, as well as helping supply the content without which the board wouldn’t exist.

Or “Resolved: Gredo shooting first is a vast improvement over the original.”

Maroon?

Imagine Bugs Bunny saying it.

I’ll be darned; I could swear I never saw that before.

Should have been immediate reinstatement, and a personal apology, but in this case Ed benefits from low expectations.

I still hope things work out here. If I keep posting the way I usually do, there’s little chance of violating the idiotic new rule. On the other hand, just knowing there is a rule makes me want to violate it.

So far, I’m enjoying the new forum at http: / / domebo. net / forum (we’re supposed to not directly link to other message boards, right?)

To his credit Ed did apologize in the second one; how common is that?

If it were me, it would be the least you could expect. For Ed, it’s uncommon.

As a poster–not a staff member:

  1. I have no doubt that you did not see it.
  2. I have no doubt that you believe his apology was insufficient, and your reinstatement too late.
  3. But you have falsely accused him at least twice in the last week.
  4. Might I humbly suggest you be the bigger man and apologize for that? You’d generate another post at the same time. Hey, it’s a win-win. :wink:

To be crystal clear, I am not taking any action as a moderator here. This is not a warning or an admonishment. It is my opinion. That’s all.

I don’t understand your comment about generating another post; could you explain? :slight_smile:

I’m puzzled too!

You’re right.

Ed, I apologize about that. For these five months, I really thought you never made any public acknowledgement of what went down. I should have done my research first, or at least given you the benefit of the doubt. We are all imperfect vessels.

I feel better now. Let’s see, how close are we to a thousand posts? Let me count . . . 998 . . . 999 . . . .

Somebody else take the short putt.