Would you rather be extremely good-looking with a tiny penis or extra-ugly but blessedly-hung? I’d take hung.
whoops; obviously wrong forum…
Ugly can be fixed…
Not as dangerous to fix as cursedly small, either, should the relevant party wish to so do.
Can I have average and average please?
Well, thankfully, the two are not mutually exclusive. 
Bye SDMB, it’s been fun 
Jeff
Well, this extremely good-looking guy, he has a mouth, a tongue and two hands, right? If so, then I’ll take him… 
Good looking by far. The girls that take you home for sex won’t find out it’s tiny until it’s sex time. The ugly guy would have to either wear skin tight pants all the time, or post online picks of just his johnson (with a fire extinguisher next to it for size comparison).
Good looking teeny weenies get laid alot more often than ugly guys regardless of their size. Besides having a tiny willy only sucks for the girl.
I’d take good looking. I’ve heard a lot of women say that a really big… thang… is really not very comfortable. I’d rather be attractive and know how to use my little toy… or other talents…
That’s hard question but I think Handsome wins out. I choose handsome, and believe me that was not an easy choice.
Come on, people. Looks fade; penis size doesn’t. Plus, a bigger one feels better for you - there’s just plain more surface area.
Extremely good looking hands down. Besides being a porn star there is not much you can do with a huge penis and an ugly face. But as an extremely good looking man you would be more likely to get a job or be promoted, attract a lot of women easily, and be less likely to be convicted of a crime. All those things don’t require having a large penis. Sure the ladies may not like your mini-member, but what the hell your a hunk, you can always find another lady thats willing. Besides its not like I’d be having any less fun.
Assuming all else was absolutely equal (both guys are intelligent, funny, and good company, etc) and assuming both guys are competent lovers…
Good looks. Ideally I’d prefer average/average, but since we’re talking extremes, I’d go for the good looking guy over Quasimodo.
Frankly, if I’m in there for the long-term I’m gonna be spending a lot more time actually looking at the guy than having sex with him. And honestly, if he was horrendously horrible to look at it’d be very hard to get sexually interested enough to care how big his package was (if I even cared, which I frankly don’t. I don’t subscribe to the theory of bigger=better).
While we’re on the topic of Male Sexual Myths…
Guys: lasting longer does NOT necessarily mean a guy is good in bed. Personally, I vastly prefer shorter duration but maximum enthusiasm than ‘Watch me prove my manliness by taking forever’. Also, adding a big penis to that particular equation doesn’t mean that tedious sex suddenly becomes good sex. What it means is that the tedious sex just became actively annoyingly chafe-y as well.
-Khia. Just looking for average, average, and enthusiastic.
Polls belong in In My Humble Opinion. I’ll move this for you.
Cajun Man
for the SDMB
Is there any chance I can be handsome while the lights go out and hung when I’m naked?
I seem to recall a parable about this (a girl marries a guy under a curse, and he tells he can be handsome or hung and she has to choose - she says “I’ll choose whichever YOU’D prefer”, and because she loves him he’s handsome AND hung… I was always puzzled as it didn’t seem to mean anything.)
Too big=pain.
Pain=no fun.
Small-n-hunky, please.
I’d rather have one of those faces that opens doors, rather than one of those that just looks like it’s been used for that purpose, and for rather too long at that.
As for the trouser-goods, I’ll take the Goldilocks’ model all the way. I don’t know if I’d be saddled with a micropenis in exchange for exactly the right face. Maybe if I could try it out a bit and make sure it works.
There’s no chance I’d opt for the huge cock and take a clockstopping face, though. Even without the ugly levy, it doesn’t seem like a great deal. Hell, I get led around by my middling-sized unit too much as it is – there’s no way I’d give that puppy a controlling interest in the corporation.
If you’re that ugly, you probably won’t be getting any play anyway. Gotta go the “good looks” route.
It’s the Devil’s own choice, I think. Ugly and hung is a waste of meat (Come back, honey! You ain’t seen my dick yet!) Handsome and small… well, how small? Too small and you’ll run into the ol’ “throwing a hotdog down a hallway” scenario way too often.
I think I’d choose handsome. Technology is a wonderful thing. bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…
So can the other. Penis transplants would probably be a very common thing…only problem is there aren’t too many guys willing to be organ donors. :ahem: :rolleyes:
A tiny penis? How tiny are you talking about? What do you consider blessedly-hung. As hung up as men are on penis size, I don’t think very many would be willing to give up a couple of inches for a makeover. Hey, there’s a new extreme makeover meets Survivor show. Ugly guy’s with big dicks swap places with pretty boys with no dicks.
Do a genital transplant and face makeovers. Send 'em out into the world with a thousand bucks cash and a new suit. They can’t use any aspect of their previous life. Give them a year and see what effect their physical changes have made.
Sorry about the hijack pizzabrat just the shrink in me I guess. oooh that’s another thread.
Regarding the OP…tough call I’m a bit above average (my wife says a lot) in both categories, so I’d like to try hmmm, (no ego here huh?)
Let me think about it awhile. I’ll get back to ya.