Positive Gun News of the Day

Since the guy was hiding. The article doesn’t mention any threatening moves. Should the mom have held him at gunpoint and called 911?

I wish they’d give more details in these news reports.

Not enough details, but under Oregon law she’s probably in the clear. § 161.219 says that a person is justified in using deadly force if the person reasonably believes that the other person is (2) committing or attempting to commit a burglary in a dwelling.


In other news, MAN SHOOTS, INJURES INTRUDER

DGU with no deaths. I would say changing the locks after you move into a new place is a good idea.

In other news,Teen burglars greeted by gunfire in Jeannette

DGU with no deaths. 4 vs 1 and the one prevailed. Reading the article it seems like both the homeowner and the burglars began posting to Facebook immediately about the incident which seems unwise.

Not sure why that’s “positive.” I know in this case nobody was killed but if I killed an unarmed 13-year-old even if he was trying to break into my house, it would haunt me for the rest of my life.

He was not fatally shot, just in the foot. He landed in jail but I’m afraid that you won’t hear about *any *ending until one of them is dead. I hope it’s him.

It would be unfortunate - but I regard being able to defend yourself from home invasion by 4 people as a positive thing.

I guess there is a debate over whether home invasion per se poses a threat requiring deadly force to defend. I guess it depends on the laws of whatever state, and of course the individual situation. (See also: not-so-positive story about the man who killed his own teenage son thinking it was a home invasion.)

All states allow self defense including lethal self defense if necessary to defend your life or the life of another. The specific fact pattern matters, but generally when in your own home and someone has forcibly entered or attempts to enter, this satisfies the requirement that a person be in reasonable fear of great bodily injury.


In other news, Deputies: Neighbor catches burglar in the act, held him at gunpoint

DGU with no injuries. If that’s my neighbor I’m buying him a 6 pack. Good job neighbor!

I’d buy him a fifth.

Case and a fifth.

In other news, Mother shoots attempted break-in suspect who entered through baby’s window

DGU with no deaths. Given the walkie talkie and zip ties I’m thinking this could have gone very badly if the intruder got their way.

Man charged after opening fire, wounding several people at nightclub

Man opens fire on crowd of bystanders and one of them is able to return fire, ending the shooting spree. Eventually there will be a mass shooting ending this way that the national media won’t be able to ignore.

I don’t think so. The media has done a good job ignoring this story, given that it happened several days ago, even while sit-ins and other protests are being held by gun control advocates in the wake of the similar FL event. The mainstream media doesn’t want to report events like this, so they don’t. I read about this event on an alternative media outlet, but haven’t heard a peep from mainstream sources.

You would surely hear about it if the second guy had hit a bystander.

In other news, HPD: Store clerk fatally shoots suspected robber

DGU with one death. I can’t imagine the dollar store is a high value target.

In other news, TACO STAND EMPLOYEE FATALLY SHOOTS SUSPECT IN SOUTH LA BOTCHED ROBBERY

DGU with one death. 3 vs 1 and the one prevailed. They picked the wrong taco stand.

Unfortunately the article does not say whether the suspect was armed, appeared to be armed, or what threat he otherwise posed.

Other than attempting robbery. His actions were clearly unlawful. Do you wait until the suspect injures or kills someone before deciding to stop him?

You wait until the suspect poses a threat to life or limb.

A more informative article from the L.A. Daily News. FTA:

The clerk shot the guy with the gun, stopped shooting him when he wasn’t a threat anymore, and didn’t shoot anyone else. Better than the cops do, frankly.

Really, the fact the criminals were robbingtaking money or goods in the possession of another, from his or her person or immediate presence, by force or intimidation—should be sufficient. OTOH, the media is frequently imprecise with their descriptive language, and it wouldn’t be surprising for them to call a mere theft a robbery.