“Sweet cheeks” would be better. Or “Caribou Barbie”.
I agree with this.
Sarah Palin could be in a severe car wreck this afternoon, with her bloodied and mangled body in intensive care, and there would be people crying, “Republican cover up! That’s not her, that’s a body double like what John Travolta did in Swordfish! Cover up, cover up, OMG, cover up!!!11!11!!1”
And there would also be people crying “OMG it was terrorists sent by Barack Hussein Obama!” Seriously, you have any point to make here?
My point is that anyone who seriously suggests that Palin won’t be at the debate tonight is retarded.
I am suggesting exactly that.
Primarily because the debate will be tomorrow.
Well, it would be funny if she shows up tonight.
“Where is everybody?”
The debate isn’t tonight so the people you speak of wouldn’t be retarded…they’d be correct.
Too slow! Neener neener neener.
:smack:
Thank you for providing a cite.
Your cite does not back up your assertion that
The article you linked to says
You misquoted your own cite, and misrepresented what Sen. Obama said. Your cite may not even accurately quote Sen. Obama. I’m certain that he did not say “dot dot dot” and we have no way of knowing what may have been edited out there by the article writer.
Further, Sen. Obama goes on to say
He never said what you say he said.
If it makes you feel any better, I read your post and immediately checked the timestamp and seeing that it was today, thought, “What, is the debate today? I thought it was tomorrow!”
It wasn’t until I started typing this that I realized how dumb it was to check the timestamp. Did I think it was gonna be Thursday’s timestamp?
:smack: indeed.
Daniel
Heh heh heh. My major run-in with Shodan, a few years ago, was exactly the same thing, except even dumber. He accused me of misrepresenting someone else’s words, despite the fact that I labeled my words as a biased paraphrase. He followed me around the boards sniping at me with this accusation in multiple threads. He supported his accusation by using quote marks around my words–except that they weren’t my words, but were, rather, an inaccurate paraphrase of what I’d said. It was pretty damn funny.
Good to see he’s up to his old tricks. As I posted before in post 100, if you parse what he says, he seems simultaneously aware and unaware of his own foolishness.
Daniel
I swear, I thought today was Thursday. My new job has my internal clock all kinds of screwed up.
Did anybody happen to hear the following line from Bay Buchanan in response to James Carville on Anderson Cooper last night? (It’s not namedropping if you’re just quoting a TV show is it?)
If I weren’t tired I’d give it it’s own pit thread. What’s terrifying and infuriating is that she wasn’t saying it as a criticism of Palin, but as something admirable! Emphases mine of course.
Reminds me a bit of Kirstey Alley/Rebecca’s comment on CHEERS that
except Rebecca was funny. Cause she wasn’t real. And Palin could well be our president as early as next year.
Yes, but who has more to gain by rearranging her Microsoft Calendar?
“Now look. I got this Invite from Gwen … Gwen Stefani? Gwen somebody… right here. There’s supposed to be podiums up on stage and everything, and there isn’t even a tele-prompter set up! Somebody’s making a B-i-i-ig mistake here…” 
My vote is he calls her “cupcake.”
here’s an article about how Gov. Palin is brushing up on foreign policy.
Nope, both wrong.
Sure he did.
Obama also claimed
and
So he is making those claims. Cite, as if it were necessary.
Regards,
Shodan
No, you are wrong.
No, he didn’t.
Those claims are not the same thing as you originally said. And neither of them support your earlier assertions.
Nice try.
Thank you; come again.