Proof that John = Cyberian

And you know what? He’s not even a little bit embarrassed. The man has no shame.

Personally, I think he’s a mental case.

Say, why isn’t CandySomething here to defend poor Cyb?

Candy isn’t allowed to post while Cyb is at work.

For those that are wondering who this putz is, go to Opal’s Teeming Millions page for a rundown on the King of Trolls, AKA Cyberian54.

Now, Wally, even without the obvious point that labeling him King of Trolls is an insult to trolls everywhere, I would not characterize John as a troll.

Rather than someone who will say anything to get a rise or a reaction on an MB or NG, John actually believes 99.9% of the drek that he posts. (More’s the pity.)

I think he shares with trolls a need to be validated (note how he starts lots of threads calling for people to agree with him and rarely actually reads (if he can) any opposing viewpoints), but I don’t think he posts just any old thing simply for its value in producing a reaction.


Tom~

Just wondering if there was a thread or a set of threads that would give a quick run-down on John John’s (and/or sock puppets) activites that have exposed him for who he really is.


Voted Rookie of the Year in MPSIMs and the Pit, along with Best One-liners.
And I don’t plan on keeping this as my sig for long, just until the winning buzz wears off.

Try this thread called 6 billion for some classic examples of his hit and run posting style.

And here’s a fantastic quote from a thread on the Mentally Ill aka Homeless

UncleBeer: You don’t think he’s really Mark Serlin as well, do you?

I hadn’t even considered that before, TomH. But no, I don’t. The Serlin personalities were evil, bigotted, hate-filled creatures not even worthy of my scorn. John John may be annoying at times, but I don’t think he’s a bigot by any stretch of the imagination.

Good point. It’s just that the only other people with whom he agrees, or who agree with him, tend to be his sock puppets.

There’s also the fact that Mark Serlin had a rather more polished prose style.

UncleBeer, then it’s obvious you missed the infamous Khazar discussion a couple years ago on AOL, when John repeatedly posted things that had a decidedly anti-Semitic tone. He made fun of kashrut, and basically said that anyone who keeps kosher in the 10th century is an anachronistic idiot (guess we should all go with the flow and convert to Christianity, right?). He consistantly quoted web pages that espoused bigoted thoughts, and when knocked for repeating these things, he would reply: “I’m not anti-Semitic, my wife is half-Jewish!” Great. Kol haKavod.

I also find his anti-English remarks to be not only insulting but patently ridiculous. His over-the-top Irish nationalism is completely absurd.

~Harborina

“Don’t Do It.”

Did I say 10th century? That was, of course, a typo. I meant 20th. And when he said it, it was the 20th century.


~Harborina

“Don’t Do It.”

Gee, Opal, I had that better picture you could have used…

I knew it was around somewhere . . .

Ladies and Gentlemen, I would like to submit Exhibit C for the Prosecution.

This is just adding gasoline to the flames, I suppose, but back in January, MikeyLikesIT posted a hypothetical situation in which a mom was total ho-bag and dad was a sack, and wondered what to do with the kids: http://204.95.48.199/ubb/Forum7/HTML/000975-2.html

JohnJohn suggested:

(Just FTR, this was a quite reasonable response IMO, and certainly NOT indicative of a troll.)

I said:

JohnJohn replied:

Again, a good response, and an intelligent one.
But he responded to me when I called him “Cyb.” With no other comment.

Until people started calling him on it and using his past life against him, it seems he accepted it as a matter of course.

Cha-ching.

-andros-

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.


Coldfire
Voted Poster Most Likely To Post Drunk


"You know how complex women are"

  • Neil Peart, Rush (1993)

Unclebeer sweety, you know I love you and everything but you couldn’t be more wrong with this statement.


You turn me on. But maybe it’s because I just spent 20 years in the jungle, getting it on with anything I could attract with a piece of fruit.

Am I the only person who thinks that, based on the first pic in this thread, John John is George Steinbrenner?

Kyla, Diane, after reading your posts and acknowledging your longer experiencew with John John, I will retract my statement about his prejudices. I apologize for my ignorance.

Now I can’t tell for sure from the pictures provided, but it seems that John John/Cyberian(etc) has an awfully large ass…

For the sake of the memory deficient posters, can we all just use ONE username?

(whispering) He’s not Michael Masterson, is he?

Wow, you are awesome Opalcat. Not! John was another poster? Wow, that rocks my world. You know what I think? I think most of you are too small-minded to know what you think. If you have a problem with this man, I guess you have a right to your opinion.

But as far as the thread he started about Hillary! Brontosaurus Butt, it all stands. She has a HUGE arse and no qualifications for the position she is seeking! So there!

Foofs hair and stomps out…