I don’t see why it’s so important to know if John John is Cyberian. Is that knowledge supposed to somehow lower my opinion of his character, insight, eloquence or intelligence?
My opinion of him can’t get any lower.
I’ve never read a post by Cyberian, but I’ve read hundreds by John John, most of which have been inaccurate, offensive, hypocritical or badgering. If the photos at the start of this thread are, indeed, pictures of John John, I am stunned that a man of so many years can be as ignorant as he is. Judging from his posts, I assumed he was just an opinionated 18 year old high school dropout.
A few questions John John,
Why do you think it is that you are so disliked by the posters on this board? How do you account for being voted “Most Reliably Inaccurate”? Why do you have no friends here (except for Sandy “9 posts and I think Hillary has a fat ass” Cane)?
I learned long ago that if most people think you’re a jerk, it’s probably because you are.
Posted as WHO, WHEN? Your PROOF is what? I NEVER posted to these boards as anyone but John John. What are the sn you are accusing me of posting under here?
This is an UNFOUNDED ACCUSATION that you have adopted as accurate but is based SOLELY on some assholes paranoia.
mouth
WHAT actions? Do you even have a clue of what you’re talking about?
Sounds fine to me, Wally. I wonder if you would post your pic here for us to see. How about you too, tomndebb? Tom’s got the biggest mouth but is very shy with his pic. What’s up with that, tom? Andros, would you like to also post your pic? Mouthbreather, Aenea,Lynn Bodoni, LilethSC, Drivemaster, TubaDiva, Ed Zotti, DavidB, CDexHaven?
Unless you are all forthcoming, you are decidedly NOT, why do you want everyone else to be?
I can’t believe I am going to waste key strokes on this guy, but the proof is there for anyone to see.
First check out the profile on the Teeming Millions homepage for the character listed as CYBERIAN54. Notice the photo (same guy as Opal’s photos), the date of birth (Aquarian), the location (NY), and the career (entrepreneur). http://fathom.org/teemingmillions/profiles
Even though it’s obvious to those with more than one brain cell that this is the same person, he will continue to look like an idiot and never admit it.
Trust me, it is best to just ignore this multiple personality freak.
You turn me on. But maybe it’s because I just spent 20 years in the jungle, getting it on with anything I could attract with a piece of fruit.
How does Cyberian fit in?
wallyquote]I’m talking about screen names.
[/quote]
What sn’s? I have been accused of many. What are the sn’s that I’m being accused of being? Bulicool is one of them and Sandy is another. Can you and your pal tom provide the rest of your fantasy names?
How about my question?
What sn’s? I have been accused of many. What are the sn’s that I’m being accused of being? Bulicool is one of them and Sandy is another. Can you and your pal tom provide the rest of your fantasy names?
You didn’t answer?
Truces do not have strings, or else we call them surrenders. Duh!
Have you orgotten about the Captain Ed fiasco in which an unethical juxtaposition of retired airline captain status was made with retired Navy Officer status thus implying said adult bigot was a retired Navy Captain when in fact he is a retired Navy Lieutentant Commander, two ranks below the implied rank?
Just one question though, regarding the AOL profile for Johnsbury. Is this the profile that is attached to the Cyberian handle? I ask this because the e-mail adres for Cyberian seems to be missing or false on the TM page (XXX@AOL.com).
Of course, if the answer to that question is yes, I need no further proof. Same information, same birthday, same location. Nuff Said.
Not so. As the following extracts from the Oxford English Dictionary demonstrate, whether or not conditions are attached is immaterial in distinguishing between a truce and a surrender. A truce be conditional or unconditional.
Surrender: the giving up of something (or of oneself) into the possession or power of another who has or is held to have a claim to it; esp. (Mil., etc.) of combatants, a town, territory, etc. to an enemy or a superior. In wider sense: Giving up, resignation, abandonment.
[/QUOTE]
I only mention this because your failure to grasp the meaning of these common English words may be a factor contributing to the ignorant outlook on world politics which you demonstrated elsewhere. I hope that this is helpful.
TomH, you blooming blighter, it is no surprise you don’t understnand the difference even in the definitions YOU posted. He asked for a truce but made it conditional,[Truce: a suspension of hostilities for a specified period between armies at war (formerly also between combatants in a private feud or quarrel); a temporary peace or cessation from arms; an armistice; also, an agreement or treaty effecting this.] and a truce does not require a condition, except cessation of hostilites, but is an agreement by both parties. You are such a dolt!
What??? Monty, are you accusing me of being Captain Ed too? Holy smokes! You people are off the charts. This is just further proof that you are just floundering and making blanket accusations. You all lose more credibilty with each lame accusation.
There is no more Cyberian54 on AOL. That account was cancelled for violations of Terms of Service in June, 1998. Similarly, there is probably not an AOL profile anywhere for Optamissed, since that account was also terminated for violations of Terms of Service later in the year (or very early in 1999).