cite?
I know that this is accepted received wisdom in some circles, but what does it mean exactly?
If by “attractive” you mean “able to attract a spouse”, anecdotal evidence suggests that this is by no means true. There are millions of unattractive women who are married, with or without money and power.
And as someone said above, an unattractive man does not look better because he has more money. He might be a better catch, but the same definitely does hold true for women (plenty of “poor little rich girls” can attest to that).
But the real issue I have with your post is that you imply that attractiveness is somehow the be-all and end-all of life. To those of us with a sense of self that’s a little more than skin deep, that’s baloney.
Yes, the media tends to portray only beautiful women. That hardly equates to “everything around her she tells her that her value as a person is dependent on how physically attractive she is.”
What about intelligence? Does no experience (school, work, attempting to get into a debate on the SDMB) suggest that her value as a person is in part dependent on her intelligence?
What about compassion and morality? Doesn’t the way she is treated by friends and family, her religious upbringing and education, and numerous books, movies, T.V. shows, etc. suggest that her worth might be measured by how she treats others?
What about money? Doesn’t the media bombard us daily with the message that riches = success and happiness? That we should value ourselves based on our balance sheets?
Or is your view of the world so sexist that in your mind these attributes are only relevant for men?
Yes, American media portrayals of women lack diversity. But the situation isn’t quite as black and white as you paint it. There are great heroines and role models like Dame Judi Dench, Kathy Bates, Patrika Darbo, Cammryn Manheim, Rosie O’Donnell, Madeleine Albright, Janet Reno, Queen Elizabeth II, Penny Marshall, Whoopi Goldberg and many, many more who don’t fit the current attractiveness standard. More importantly, that earlier thread about media influence showed that girls’ perceptions of themselves were far more likely to be influenced by their parents (in particular their mothers) than by external factors.
I feel very, very sorry for any woman whose self-worth is solely determined by her appearance. I also feel sorry for any man who determines his own worth solely by his appearance, or by his wealth, his social status, the number of children he has fathered, or any other superficial measurement.
And finally, being attractive (in the overall sense) to the gender of your choice is a very nice thing. Finding that one person with whom you can share your life is wonderful. But even that is not the only thing on which a life can be judged.