Ah, Rube, the extreme emotional swings (and that vomity smell on threads you post to in the morning) all makes sense now.
All past the vomiting stage now, except when I read what you post, babe. As for the emotional swings, well, you’re the emotional one in this thread. Take a Midol and lay down, willya?
Lay down, huh? When will you Doper women stop making these sexual advances toward me? Yeesh and sheesh!!
Also, we’ve found the cause for you being butthurt all the time (and I don’t mean the pregnancy hemorrhoids)–daddy doesn’t wanna spooge on junior, huh?
We find your adolescent surliness and immunity to logic irresistible! Women are silly that way.
Rand is a dude? :eek:
No.
“Dude” indicates a particular level of affable, easygoing friendliness that Rand Rover lacks. See “The Big Lebowski” for an explanation: Take Jeff “The Dude” Lebowski and, except for the gender, invert every aspect of his personality and you have Rand Rover. Basically Rand Rover is Walter Sobchak without any of Walter’s redeeming qualities.
Nope. Rand Rover is male, for suitably large values of “male”, but I won’t claim him as a “man”. The standards are quite a bit higher for the latter.
Shut up, Donny.
Actually, I think if you inverted every part of The Dude Lebowski’s personality, you end up with The Big Lebowski.
Which seems a pretty apt fit for Rand Rover.
Well, the hippies did lose, can’t fault me there.
Ah, but the “Big” Jeff Lebowski had redeeming qualities. Hard to imagine Rand Rover sponsoring a troop of Little Rand Rover Achievers. Although, if he did and and the result is what we see posted as Rand Rover, that would explain the general childishness of his posts.
Not that I’m even close to Chicago, but even if I were, why would I want to hang out with RR? We haven’t had a lot of fights here in the big scheme of things, but I don’t see eye to eye with him. I can’t imagine actaully wanting to spend a day around him and I’m sure her probably feels the same way about me.
Being in each others faces is not going to change anyone’s opinions.
Not really. He “sponsored” them using someone else’s money, which he then stole. He was pretty much a shitheel through and through. Walter had far more redeeming qualities: loyalty, bravery, a good bowler. Really, his only drawback was his temper. The Big Lebowski was pretty much worthless as a human being.
Gaffa: clearly Donny.
Miller: clearly Bunny (and here’s a twenty).
You’re just jealous that nobody thinks you’re Karl Hungus.
Ah, you’re right. My mistake. “…pretty much a shitheel through and through” is an excellent description of Rand Rover.
U fail at qouting
Huh. Well, at least your quoting worked.
So, I finally check back with “That Rand Rover Dope Thread” to see if anyone’s offended by my original post (stating that a number of us Dopers could use therapy!). Oh, good, no rational posters’ feelings hurt, just a post from RR (keep in mind this is in response to a post where I point out that he insults people that are trying to help him) (Warning, the irony gets a little thick):
– And I was afraid I was being too quick to judge the guy as having serious problems. Ah, well.
ps: doesn’t bother me, but please don’t show this to my saintly silver-coiffed mother.
Guess what buddy–the carpet matches the drapes.