Poly -
Thanks you for confirming that there IS a distinction, and that rationalism (may/almost always does) outweigh religious conviction.
However,
Are there limits to appropiateness of religious dictates?
I say, yes, if your religion requires you to condemn another human because of who they are (through no choice of their own), then it is not only inappropiate for you to voice that conviction, it is obscene to do so.
There are those who believe that Allah requires the slaughter of just about all non-Muslims (and, to hear some of them tell it, many Muslims as well). Are we to allow such opinions in civilized debate? Yes, probably. Are we to give them any credence? Not in this lifetime.
Why would Lev. outweigh the Koran? (old transliteration, I know).
So why should some folk’s interpretation of Christianity dictate civil law and/or custom?