Richard Glover: 'Tattoo climate change deniers'

I really didn’t know how to interpret this thread’s title when I first saw it listed. But the first thing that popped into my head was that the tattoo climate - i.e. the culture surrounding tattoos - would somehow change the deniers (the thread count of fabric.)

I can think of some posters here who should have that tatooed as their sig lines!

She was in Goldfinger?

Shut the fuck up, dickhead.

** points gun at Cort **

No, no, no. You have it wrong. Climate change is caused by human activity - specifically the practice of tatooing. All those electric needles are melting the ice caps. You know the tramp stamp your sister got? It killed three polar bears.

Damn, that’s irony. My sister has a stylized polar bear family (loving male, female and baby bear) tattoo at the small of her back! :eek:

-XT

At the Goldfinger laser tattoo removal place…

“Nice Octopussy, nice… why would you like to remove your tattoo Ms?”

Clearly she doesn’t know what male polar bears do to baby polar bears.

Tattoo them at gunpoint? The furry bastards!

Polar bear abuse!

Tattooing global warming deniers is bad, but this is clearly the grater crime.

Oh man. Even for you that was low.

Glover’s reply

I don’t find Glover funny, and frequently find his afternoon radio show irritating (though frequently with good, well conducted interviews). But good lord people, that piece was obviously not serious. There is a stereotype view that Americans are, in general, irony-impaired. This has simply reinforced that view among the reading public.

Sum total? He thinks the SDMB is right wing, and has removed his email addy from his pieces so he doesn’t get more hate mail.

Maybe I should ring in to his show and suggest his next piece be on removing shoes before entering a house.

:slight_smile:

I knew it wasn’t ‘serious’, but it also wasn’t entertaining.

Either he is “not serious” again, or he isn’t familiar with the internet. Maybe somebody should tell him about http://knowyourmeme.com/

Or 4chan

Pretty clearly, the website he mentions is not the SDMB.

Hey! Stop stealing my material.

I don’t think he’s saying that about the SDMB - **Quartz **presumably cribbed that link from somewhere else, yes ? I kinda doubt he reads the Sydney Morning Herald.

As others noticed, that was not the SDMB.

As I suspected, Glover was trolling, but if we take him at his word, then he is really naive, if he was so informed he should already had been aware about the death threats to the local climate scientists.

http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2011/06/australian_climate_scientists.php

And elsewhere:
http://climatecrocks.com/2010/03/15/flogging-the-scientists/

That was last year BTW.

FWIW, here is Glover’s addition to the original article: