I’ve said it on this board many times, but I’ll say it again. If this guy thought he could make a buck by taking a dump on the American flag, you’d see his bowels moving at warp speed.
Looks more like he’s posting from a smartphone.
No, I prefer blank verse.
I write short lines beacuse I think they are easier to read,
and also because I am eccentric.
(The above don’t scan too well I’m afraid)
You are mistaken.
Yeah, this isn’t a huge deal for me but since colonial mentioned that he (she?) actually thinks it makes an improvement in readability, I’ll concur that it actually makes the posts less readable for me. They come across choppy and fragmented.
He.
I believe after getting used to shorter lines they would be earlier.
I recall that in SAT Verbal prep class eons ago we were taught to try
to take in whole secions of a line at once, rather than read word-by-word.
This seems to me to be easier with short lines, allowing you to move
your eyes down only, rather than across and down as with longer lines.
Which is not unusual at all. Talk shows (both radio and TV) are mostly forms of entertainment. That’s what RO is.
You know that that’s how all competent readers read? Why would someone NOT read like this?
No, they really won’t. The problem is that, by introducing a carriage return well short of the end of the page width, you are unintentionally communicating that you intend for a full stop at that point, despite the fact that you’re often in mid-sentence. This badly disrupts the flow of your writing, and distracts from your content.
Trust me on this one. You’re not the first poster to do this. It doesn’t get any easier or less distracting with time.
Err, so were the Hitler Youth presumably.
The Norway rat who kliled all those people had a lot more in common with a right wing anti government type, like Timothy McVeigh, than a Nazi.
What I meant was that if everyone used shorter lines everyone would get used to it. Clearly if only one member out of 1000s is different than it is difficult to impossible to get used to it.
I have gotten maybe 10-15 complaints in about 10,000 posts in about seven years at 10-15 different boards, but this is the first time anyone has specified that short cr conveys full stop. That is not the case in blank verse, speaking of which.
Sometimes I go to longer or full-line formatting, but being used to the other I revert. Maybe it’s time to try again.
There was nothing to debate and the expectation was not to challenge other parties in a democratic setting once they became adults in Nazi Germany, so NO.
It’s like reading a telegram.
Nazi Germany had electoral politics? Cite?
I mean in terms of them enthusiastically thinking that through their participation they would make the world “a bit of a better place”. Also, it seems in Scandanavian politics that some views are just suppressed or marginalised - the idea of tolerant debate and open discussion is garbage.
Cite?
Even that is questionable, they thought they were making the world a better place for Germany alone.
Deutschland, Deutschland über alles,
Über alles in der Welt,
Germany, Germany above everything,
Above everything in the world.
As we have seen already your opinion here is not based on real history and this is just historical sour grapes. Extreme conservative views already were tried in Europe and they did not produce a better place.
Nitpick: That song dates to 1841 and was an anthem of early German nationalism. The message is not that Germany should be set above other nations, but that Germans everywhere should be more loyal to Germany-as-a-whole than to their own particular principalities.
How is Norway a better place as a result of their recent immigration policies? It seems a more dangerous place for women.
http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article190268.ece
Ironically, you seem to overlook that many of the people entering as a result of the immigration policies you support, have far more conservative views than the people you criticise:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/12/admissions-of-illiberalism/
[shrug] Time was, I have no doubt, one could have cited similar statistics (assuming the existence of statistics compilation) about poor Irish or Italian immigrants in American cities. Doesn’t mean letting them in was a bad idea.