Someone pit this. I don’t have the strength.
So that his may count as a legitimate Pit thread, I add the following:
FUCKWIT!
Someone pit this. I don’t have the strength.
So that his may count as a legitimate Pit thread, I add the following:
FUCKWIT!
If it will make you feel better, I’ll nominate you. I’m guessing a letter is all it takes.
Sports writer Bill Simmons has what he calls The Unintentional Comedy Scale. I’d say this quote pegs the needle.
Ha. In your face, nitwit Gore-gushers!
(Gushing with gore? And blood? Don’t ask.)
Y’know, since Arafat won, I just can’t take the NPP seriously any more.
Yeah, sure has gone downhill since Kissinger won.
How you nominate someone for the Peace Prize. Short version: If you aren’t one of these people, fuggeddaboudit:
So, somebody on there thinks Rush is the bees knees. Anyone care to guess who? The information about non-winning nominations is locked for 50 years, so post your guesses and then bookmark this thread…
From http://nobelpeaceprize.org/eng_com_nom.html:
[QUOTE]
Any one of the following persons is entitled to submit proposals:[ul]
[li]members of national assemblies and governments;[/li][li]members of international courts of law;[/li][li]university chancellors; university professors of social science, history, philosophy, law and theology;[/li][li]leaders of peace research institutes and institutes of foreign affairs;[/li][li]former Nobel Peace Prize laureates;[/li][li]board members of organisations that have received the Nobel Peace Prize;[/li][li]present and past members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee; (committee members must present their nomination at the latest at the first committee meeting after February 1);[/li][li]former advisers at the Norwegian Nobel Institute.[/ul][/li][/quote]
I don’t see any categories under which the Landmark Legal Foundation would qualify, unless they’re claiming to be an “institute of foreign affairs”, so this little publicity stunt will likely end up in File 13.
If Rush won, his $1.6 million prize would be $600,000 more than the annual budget of the Landmark Legal Foundation. And this is “the leading conservative public interest law firm in the United States?” Geez.
Yup. Publicity. That’s all it is. Limbaugh’s response to Gore’s nomination.
That will look grreat on my resume! Thanks!
You know on reflection, this is not really pitworthy. It really does not bear more than a sigh and a shrug…
Yeah, nomination means nothing. IIRC, Bush and Blair were nominated during their bloodthirsty march to war.
From the link in the OP:
Yeah, it looks like just a Rushie shot at Gore.
Surely, we have a Doper that teaches History, Social Science, Philosophy, Law or Theology at a University level.
(I actually have a friend who’s Dad qualifies, next time I see him I’ll have to ask if he’s ever nominated anyone).
Great. Now, every time Rush says something stupid (approximately 1,000 times per day, by my count), some Freeper will chime in to defend his idiocy by citing the fact that Rush is a Nobel Peace Prize nominee.
Since LLF is not entitled to nominate Rush Limbaugh, isn’t he not nominated for a Nobel Prize? Anyone can nominate anyone else, but most people aren’t going to have their nominations counted.
Christ, even Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini managed to wangle real Nobel peace prize nominations.
This makes Rush look like such a loser.
Do I have to be a full professor?
Who among us has consistently and actively promoted peaceful interaction on SDMB? I’m at my desk with my departmental letterhead, eagerly await your suggestions.
Allow me to peacefully call attention to my own legacy of peace, and further note that 1 million dollars will purchase enough illegal prescription meds to make me even more peaceful in the future. The remaining 600 grand I will freely distribute among all those who nominated me, so everyone will get their own ‘peace’ of the action.
While I’ve never been accused of junior modding, I must respectfully decline your admittedly pacific self-nomination on the grounds that accepting it would appear to condone breakng Board rules related to illegal activity.
The serene **Giraffe, ** who has generously and selflessly distributed underpants to all (in another time and place), has garnered the first nomination. Additional quotes and evidence of **Giraffe’s ** peace-loving nature are now being solicited by the Committee.
Other nominations still may be proffered.
Shoshana
Assistant Professor of a Social Science