Russia invades Ukraine {2022-02-24} (Part 2)

From an article:

I do think the contract reason is also very plausible. If the pipeline is damaged by unknown persons, then financial penalties from unfulfilled contractual obligations might be avoided, in a manner they probably wouldn’t be by openly turning off the supply with the intention to freeze/punish the other party to the contract. I think that all parties understood the future of the Nord Stream project to be dead at this point.

Russia clearly believed they could pressure Europe to cease aiding Ukraine by cutting off heating during winter. This would have helped those efforts, while attempting to shift blame elsewhere.

Ukraine primed for spring offensive.

Austrian chancellor reveals Putin’s chilling response to Russian casualties.

Hidden by What Exit?

What country has a lot of pipelines going through it from Russia to Europe?

So how well did Europe weather the winter gas shortage?

This is moving off breaking news. Keep the thread on tract please.

The motive was to convince people that Ukraine or a pro-Ukraine actor blew up the pipeline. Double-bluff. A false false flag. Russia intelligence thinking must have been, “They’ll never think we did it. We had the most to lose!”

My personal perception as a resident is, remarkably well, through a combination of aggressive planning, better-than-usual coordination between normally fractious European states (better than usual being defined as “any at all”), and, probably more than any other factor, an unusually warm winter.

I’m not seeing a lot of news about it, but according to Denys Davidov, the Russians apparently struck an ammunition depot near Pavlohrad yesterday. Its geographic location and the size of the explosion both suggest it was for munitions intended for the upcoming Ukrainian counter-offensive. I have a bad feeling about this.

Update from Ukraine | Ukraine Takes the ground back in Avdiivka | Wagner betrayed Ruzzia - YouTube

story starts around 5:50.

I would hope Ukraine has its war supplies scattered in many locations. But any loss of ammunition hurts their plans.

OSINT twitter thinks it was a warehouse storing old S-24 (solid fuel ICBM) motors that were scheduled for decommissioning, said decommissioning languishing due to lack of funds to carry it out. I can’t find any of the relevant tweets atm, but earlier this morning I did read multiple to that effect including some geolocation analysis of the explosion videos.

This could also be misinformation spread by Ukraine to cover a serious loss of materiel, of course.

An illustration of the problem with Russian tanks’ slow reverse speed - T-90 reverse speed reportedly only 4 km/h.

Comment on that tweet:

I wonder if the problem is Russia giving poor training to its tank crews, or if the problem is discipline and the crews not following their training.

To which the obvious answer is: “It’s a floor wax AND a dessert topping!”

What hit it?

Bottle rocket.

One of Russia’s latest tanks got blown up by a firework?

No, someone threw a DVD copy of the 1996 Wes Anderson movie at it.

Incredible casualty rates in Bakhmut.

Kirby clarified the 20k number is across all front, not just in Bakhmut.

Kevin McCarthy just spoke out against Russia. Maybe Russia doesn’t fund him or support him?