As long as you’re asking, can anyone post a link to Palin calling for abstinence-based education as a preferred policy? So far as I’m aware, the only time she said she favored it was in a “pick one” survey where the other choice was put-condoms-on-the-banana sex ed.
You mean like accusing somebody of “palling around with terrorists”? That sort of thing? Or perhaps abortion?
No, I meant “condemning anyone for their moral failures”. That sort of thing.
Hustler has some videos with a pretty convincing look-a-like. Or so I’m told. Conduct your own search using the words Nailin and Palin. 
Cetainly not! I’d never even consider such a thing, even though I’m sure no one could ever find out! That’s true, right? Nobody could find out?
Palling around with terrorists isn’t a moral failing? :dubious::rolleyes:
I don’t think that phrase means what you think it means.
Look, it’s harmless so long as I don’t actually stalk her, isn’t it?!
Meh. I’d go with Sarah Palin . . . but I’d be thinking of Tina Fey.
Shut up, Cat.
-Joe
It’s not comparable to the type of personal failings we’re discussing here, e.g. sex & drugs etc.
Keep flailing, Sparky.
-Joe
Keep hating.
Works for your self esteem.
Just because YOU don’t think out-of-wedlock pregnancies and abortions and hanging out with terrorists are moral failures, SHE certainly does.
They are fundamentally different types of moral failures.
The context here - for those who’ve lost track - is whether she’s a hypocrite for condeming other people for things she’s done herself (if the allegations are true).
There is no inconsistency between criticizing a political leader for “palling around with terrorists” and enjoying some sex & drugs.
This is beyond obvious to anyone not blinded by hatred (or a complete moron).
Sa-wing and a miss!
Next go for the victim card! It’s the only one you haven’t played!
-Joe
If you say it it will become true.
Wrong tack to take. We’re not having a debate as to the meaning of hypocrisy, although it’s been a valiant effort to derail the thread. You asked for cites where she condemned people for moral failures. Cites provided. You’re the only moron in this particular conversation.
Does it have to be a specific person? To me when Fred Phelps says “God hates fags!” it’s pretty clear where he stands even without calling out an individual.
I thought it was obvious that my query was in the context of the discussion in this thread.
As a matter of fact it was obvious.
Semantic lawyering is a refuge for intellectually bankrupt losers.
I agree.
What do you have along those lines for Palin?