. . . and I will add that I have went back and looked at all my own ass (and not the ass that I had had, but the other one, that that had had, as seen in my post here, where I win the debate responding, which if you remember the 70’s was not the ass I had had, at least in that sense), and I can’t see where I didn’t not fail to score more than that other guy.
I can see you are make my point for me and therefor I win does it not? Please see my post prior to the post I posted prior to the last post prior to this on am I not? Notice my not use of comas theirby sloving the proble you have for me. I will rule on this tommorow when I have moar time.
By jove, I think we’ve discovered a new art form.
Sheesh, one day on the job and I’m already Sandra Day O’Connor (issuing one decision in favor, and one against)! 
Hoenstly, folks, I strongly suggest you not engage either **Scott **or **Shodan **in debates outside of GD. Have you never heard of the term enabler?
emphasis added.
Elvis, how about you tellm e how you refute mutant Bricker’s claim that you answered my qesuton in this thread when you said you didnt know it’s what it is? Mcoking might be fun but I fail to see how you can’t argue that I made my point sunccitcly, if I was the one who was mkaing it, however.
I’m imagining you in pigtails and a hair band, singing wistfully,
Look, here, yo,
I’m Sandra O…
and it’s making me happy.
My suggestion for the new artform’s name? Plaiditudes.
Daniel
Beautiful.
This pisses me of. I have shown on four occasions, here and here that I know how to make links so I don’t have to refer to prior posts I made without linking to what I was talking about when I made them I can just link to it and prove my point. People often think that using it can be bad but if in fact it is bad then being bad is no longer bad, just out of the norm and therefore the clam is substatinaited.
I’d just like to say that this thread hurts my brain far, far more than Scott Plaid himself ever did.
Sorry, my Parse-O-Matic choked, smoked, and died on that one. Could you try to straighten out your sentence structure a little, and tell me who “mutant Bricker” is, and I’ll give it a shot?
What does a substantiated clam look like?
Anybody remember who programmed AutoHink? (Who remembers this one?)
Maybe it’s time for a sequel program. AutoPlaid 1.0
Scott Adams in “Dilbert’s New World Order”.
It was a, I say!, it was a woosh, son.
I appreccatie your help. I will think on this and come back with my reasponse when I have more time.
A band name.
When come back, bring pie…
Substatinaited Clam would definitely be a great name for a band…
Backs away slowly.
Enjhoy,
Steven