It’s a Dilbertism, really.
I thought Scott Plaid seemed like a frothing blibberhead, but I thought that was only because he was in the Pit. I had no idea he posted the SAME WAY in GD. This thread is both enlightening and hilarious.
Actually Dogbert’s New Ruling Class. He had a contest for his newsletter’s readers a few years ago for a name for dumb people you have to work with, and that was the winning entry.
No, your crating a strawman. Why dont you go back and read, what I really, said. In fact I already, made this point in post #399. How come you always come back to the same arguments when I already prove you wrong and then you argue the same points again.
but That sjust make my point because your been two posts and link was stated when I ran it off before. Do’nt forget I channeled Shodan to a dual and he took of his glove. What am I suppose to do when I right and not say any thing if I say nothing than who will? Let me think on this oven night.
:smack: :smack: :smack: :smack: :smack:
this thread is making my brains melt and dribble out of my ears
:smack: :smack: :smack: :smack: :smack:
Oh shit **Lib’s ** drunk… (smiley)
Hmm…I stand corrected. Thank you.
I could have sworn that the crazy fucker who started the whole dog burning thing was the one who got it going. My mistake.
is this means you agree or dis-agree with me? I can not be sure and therefor ask others to rule on this on. I have other rulings to make else-where.
Not enough commas. Everything else is spot on.
Is it just me, or is the helpful advice segment of this thread over?
It wasn’t being used anyway.
Well, Scott’s offline now, so he won’t be paying attention to the helpful advice like he usually does.
To everyone’s credit, I think it lasted way longer then it should have.
Yes, yes it is. Now it’s the “mock the incoherent poster by being just as incoherent except on purpose” segment, and MY BRAINSES ARE MELTING.
I will adibe by John Mace’s ruling on this but I think you are forgeting my post #24 in that thrad about the activits judges where Shodan asked a question but not like we agreed and I had to come here to clarify my point. What am I supossed to do when I ama ttacked and I think I am the best person to answer the questions even though I can’t do it in a question it is good for degbate.
peaks in to see if it is safe again :dubious:
No it’s, like the fish, beng shot by, the shoter, what has the barell be side, for shooting in.
It should have been over about the time that those offering it recognized it would never be heeded–about eight pages ago.
Shouldn’t that be “piques in”?
It’s “peeks”, by the way.