Ok, looking over Jimmy Chitwood.
WoW having found out he was scum.
#39, #70: fluff
#92: Is not concerned about the leader on the first day, makes some suggestions about how the leader should play
#164: Elects AllWalker, comments on the best play for a scum day 1 leader is the same as a day 1 town leader.
#168 Comment about advantage of scum nightkilling the leader he is not seeing
#172: Comment about leader being elected each Day
#259,#260: Comment to OAOW about claiming as in don’t if you are hesitant. Is satisfied at this point that it is the role not another player’s action.
#268: Comments about reading which way Leader votes
#276, #282: fluff
#321: Response to Alka Seltzer for Normal Phase
#322: Disagrees with Chronos’s reasoming over his vote for OAOW
#348: Comment to peeker about his attack on Tom Scud. Says reasoning has changed but intensity has not, no good reason for it and votes peekercpa
#352: Response to and analysis on peekercpa. This line really jumps out at me - I’ll take my chances since you aren’t helping my team much anyway.
#355: comment on peekercpa not answering question
#363, #365: fluff
#383: Is town aligned
#463: Analysis on the Drain Bead thread. Interesting post. JC says the first point raised by amrussell is not legitimate and that DB’s actions were consistent over her actions towards OAOW and Chronos. Secondly is willing to give DB the benefit of doubt over her paranoia towards the Lie Detector because the same occured to him. He also points the finger carefully without naming players over those who jumped on the Drain Bead wagon to begin with. I would hazard a guess then that those initial people are more likely to be town then.
#472: response to peekercpa
#474: fluff
#484: Response to peekercpa’s claim of doctor
#486: unvotes
#503: Smear on Oredigger about OAOW’s partial roleclaim. Prods peekercpa about single/multiple docs in town
#563: Queries GuiriEnEspana about ratifying Nanooks vote for peekercpa
#565: fluff
#630: votes BillMC over his vote for Boozahol Squid, P.I.
#636, #645: fluff
#654: Comments on scum claiming doc on first day. This line jumps out. **To be very clear, though, I think that his claim is a lie. ** referring to peekercpa.
#738: Comment about jpei’s use of power. Also asks for someone to look at BillMC
#746: Questions whether jpei’s power would be scum or town, whether it was good play or scum play
#776: fluff
#809: says last 12 hours of gameplay has been anti-town
#825, #830, #833: fluff
#875: Says the following: For what it’s worth, I don’t think it’s a good idea to try to give peeker a witch trial by vig. Whether or not the vig is successful doesn’t turn on whether or not he’s scum; it turns on whether or not he’s a doctor with the ability to self-protect.
#917: Comment on amrussells vote list as a good starting point for investigation. This probably means the people who voted next for BillMC are more likely town.
#963: fluff
Well a few things certainly jump out, mainly over peekercpa.
There is an interesting comment from #352 about his team. If he was considered town this could be inocuous, but as he is scum, it could get a whole new meaning. Is he referring to his scum team or the town. A second question would whether peekercpa is on his team or not? Is peekercpa a townie causing trouble, which at the time was between peekercpa and Tom Scud, a first vote for JC given reasonable excuse against a townie, or a vote for a fellow scum who was annoying him.
The next strong comment is #654 where he states that he does not believe peekercpa’s claim at all. It is a lie. To me though, this contrasts quite a bit with his statement in #875, where he does not think we should try to night Vig peekercpa. Note, his position has changed from peekercpa is a liar to maybe he is a doc who may or may not be able to self protect. I find this really suspicious. If he thought peekercpa was a lying scum then surely a Vig would be a good idea? There is nothing in between to suggest that he has changed his mind on it.
peekercpa - you are looking might scummy atm.
In other news the following are likely townie from the comments above
from #463 as 3rd/4th/5th voters for Drain Bead with little explanation when voting.
Alka Seltzer
Daphne Black,
Freudian Slip
from #917 as the next 3 BillMC voters
Alka Seltzer
Daphne Black
AllWalker
Well, isn’t that a surprise. We have a matchup there of two people. I think JC may have unwittingly pointed out two townies.