Already re-read you in exclusion, hence the unvote. This is a complete re-read with spreadsheet for seeing who voted who when why etc.
Quoth USCDiver:
Actually, it was very useful in Mutiny on the Insipid, where the two remaining Scum were both in the top 3 suspicion, and in Weird Wild West, where it correctly identified Storyteller as most suspicious even before his investigation, despite him being under low suspicion in Town. It didn’t work so well in Lost, because of the incorrect assumption about the number of Scum, but if you’d like, I could re-run it with a broader possible range. And note that the incorrect assumption about the number of Scum, which ultimately led to the reasoning that lost Town the game, was not a result of the program: We’d have made that same incorrect assumption and reasoning with or without it. The program isn’t producing meaningful results yet this game, nor did I expect it to, and I wouldn’t have posted it at all yet if I hadn’t been asked for it.
Guiri, good point that I forgot to put in Thing Fish’s alignment. I’ll fix that when I get home.
Normal Phase, I see your point about SKs having self-protection as their first priority. All I can answer to that is that if self-preservation were my first priority, I’m apparently doing a lousy job of it, given how many votes I’ve got on me toDay.
Meanwhile, though, even if you all think I’m anti-Town of some flavor, could we also have some discussion about topics other than me? I’m pretty much resigned, at this point, to the fact that I’m going to be mislynched, but I’d hate to see the day be a total waste, as it will be if I’m lynched and there’s no other discussion. I mean, we could at least discuss folks voting for me: Even if you agree with someone’s vote, doesn’t mean you have to agree with their reasons for it. Does anyone else agree with me that Tom’s vote for me and stated beliefs seem inconsistent, for instance?
Drain Bead WoW is up to day 2; sadly, not much insight from Day 1, at least for me.
I’ll try not to post too much so you can catch up. 
/snipped
@ Chronos Were you scum in any of these games? I can see USC’s motive for your lynch vote if you were scum in all 3 and your program simply added noise and prevented useful (mis)lynches left and right. But if you were town, this is no reason for a vote - what you do in RL and what you did in previous games has no relation to your role or alignment in this one.
I’ve tried to do a WoW on Tom but keep falling asleep, last time I got to post 7 
Will try harder later tonight!
Are you referring to his saying that Jimmy Chitwood’s actions suggested you might be Town, or to something else? If it’s just that, then no, I don’t see that as inconsistent. I see the change in opinion, but I think the reason given is sufficient.
If Guiri manages a WoW on Tom and Tom one on Guiri and Drain Bead, I’ll be a happy camper. I have no ability to put in that kind of effort toDay, but I think all of them would be valuable.
Tom, what was your rationale for considering Oredigger somewhat confirmed because of Jimmy’s behavior?
It’s both that, and him saying that Drain looks extremely skeevy. And he didn’t just say “suggested town”, he said “somewhat confirmed”, which seems a lot stronger to me.
Guiri, no, I’ve always been Town so far.
BTW, Chronos, your ass is about to be saved.
…?
Almost seems like Tom was supposed to be saying that on the Scum board.
And I say that because it doesn’t seem like one Townie should be concerned with saving someone else’s ass, you know? None of us know whose ass deserves saving.
Yeah, I followed your link to the post and saw the “somewhat confirmed” (though he did say you were “less so” than the others in that category). To clarify, though: even at that level I don’t see a change of opinion as suspicious in itself. That kind of thing happens all the time.
As for Drain Bead, I’m not sure. I’d certainly be nervous if I voted for someone due to thinking they were Scum, only to have her vote the same way right behind me. I don’t know if it would be enough for me to change my mind on the vote.
Of course, Tom has not yet stated a firm opinion of Drain Bead that I remember, beyond the impression afforded by her interaction with Jimmy. Should be interesting to see what he comes up with.
Links should work now.
BEGIN DAY 1:
208 - OaOW’s ineligibility probably because of a night action.
212 - ditto
239 - OaOW shouldn’t full-claim.
256 - early game Scum leader not nec. bad (since he’ll act Townie); it’s possible knowing OaOW’s full powers could help scum (eg if he was Miller).
- jpei’s vote seems more noob than scum
[url=“http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=11602154&postcount=332”]332 - OaOW wasn’t really forced into soft-claiming
345 - “This lie-detector thing seems like it’s adding unnecessary noise.” votes Chronos for role-fishing.
395 - pings Alka for embedding his “I am Town” statement in an ambiguous sentence. also, "fishing for the few people confident enough in their towniness to come out and say that they’re town-aligned. If he’s scum and there are people who do not participate who are not his scum teammates, he may be able to flesh out PFKs or maybe another scum team that way. "
398 - fluff
399 - (to Alka) “All townies are confident that they’re town. Not all townies are going to be confident enough to say “I am town aligned,” whether through laziness or an inherent distrust of the idea of doing it or whatever. This is why I think that if we’re going to be doing this, we should ALL be doing it.”
402 (to Oredigger) “Even if OAOW brought all this upon himself by soft-claiming when it may not have been necessary, I’m having trouble seeing a town motivation in voting for him in order to force a full claim.” and also thinks cop might be fooled into investigating players who don’t claim town aligned.
403 - fluff
416 - Digger: do you think Chronos is role-fishing, or trying to mislead a cop? DB: “Why can’t it be both?”
418 to Chronos: "If you are any role other than Lie Detector, IMO what you’ve done has made it easier for Scum to find other scum and PFKs than it is for Town to find them, which concerns me. "
428 - thinks there are PFKs or 2 scum teams because of size of game; without lotsa deaths will take too long.
435 - posts (incomplete) list of “I am town” claims; FOS’s people not on list. also, “clearly I think that EVERYONE should be claiming, and am not “reluctant” to do so.” (referencing post 345)
436 - complains about how quickly bandwagon picked up.
438 - votes Normal Phase for voting for her, when the counterargument was in the post she (NP) had quoted.
440 (to FS) “Which is why I initially called it [LD stuff] noise. And it has created a gigantic distraction, and is causing you to mislynch.”
450 - complains about bandwagon, asks Oredigger who else she missed in her list.
451 (to amrussell) “How can you say “Later, that evolved,” when said evolution took place IN THE SAME POST? Literally, in the next sentence.”
455 - (to Normal) “It’s in favor of everyone alignment-claiming, and not in favor of less than everyone alignment-claiming.” (to Digger) “So you can smudge me by saying that I missed a “bunch” of people, and right now the “bunch” is exactly two … but you don’t care enough to actually prove what you’re saying about me.” [as I recall, there were a couple others as well]
456 - “I give up. I’m Vanilla Town”
461 - applauds full “I am Town” claim; suggests wagon on her is scummy.
463 - Jimmy comes to DB’s rescue (not a DB post, but included due to obvious relevance)
465 - “You know, Jimmy, you just summed up everything that I find wrong about this lynch attempt much better than I could.”
471 - fluff
482 - fluff
485 - finds peeker’s doc claim suspicious, but says Town should obviously not lynch claimed doc.
488 - proposes peeker trial-by-vig
493 - agrees with Tom Scud that trial-by-vig is bad idea, in case peeker can’t self-protect.
495, 496, 499 - fluff
512 - argues that peeker claimed multiple docs
518 - votes Oredigger for pushing one wagon and jumping on another
532 - fluff
533 - asks Chronos if he’s keeping his vote on OaOW
541 - (to Chronos) "What would you say to those who contend that OAOW has the best knowledge of whether or not full disclosure would be pro-Town? "
549 - reasserts that there are possible roles it would hurt Town more to have fully public. Also notes Gatman precedent for a Scum who has a visible role to start with.
558 - confuses AllWalker and Alka Seltzer (to Tom Scud, re: possibly-tricky “i am town” claims.
560 - fluff
561 - argues with Chronos about OaOW & full role claim
566 - fluff
568 - “I think everyone was assuming that you were definitely saying you were one of multiple Docs.” (to peeker)
581 (Cat votes Drain for the above)
587 (to Cat) “When I turn up dead, I hope everyone…wait, MOST everyone realizes that the tie between me and peeker was broken by something this weak.”
588 (to Chronos) “In a closed setup, how do you determine whether someone is lying about their role PM?”
593 - thinks peeker is scummy but doesn’t want to risk a lynch
602 - her concern about scum finding other scum teams is it would give town power roles a smaller pool to hide in
610, 612 - fluff
617 - “Normally, scum can only chat at night.” (in response to Guiri, a Mafia 101 kinda question) also criticizes Chronos for his vote on OaOW which obviously isn’t having the behavioral effect he was hoping for.
631 - Agrees with Jimmy that BillMC’s vote on Boozy is weird and suspicious
632 votes BillMC
634 - whinges at OaOW about how she’d actually declared herself Town fairly early in the process.
639 fluff
641 - notes it’s been several pages since jpei posted
644 - tells Oredigger (who posted an analysis of the Drain Bead wagon) he’s assuming she’s town when maybe he shouldn’t be.
649 - queries for explanation of jpei’s probability post; reminds jpei that he/she is tied for the lead.
653 - Claimed docs give Scum WIFOM issues when there’s another claimed power role.
658 - explains tone of first alignment-claim post as “I think this was all a really silly idea to discuss in the first place, but since that train’s left the station, here’s how we make the best of it.” I can see how you can get that my overall tone was negative about it, since it sort of was, but it was never negative about the fact that we should all claim.
662 - fluff
665 - explains to tiltawhirl why a town, even a weird town like peeker, wouldn’t lie about a role claim (danger of counterclaim, double Town mislynch of power roles).
666 - fluff. [OOH! Post #666! A clear scum tell at last!]
671 - asks peeker why he claimed when he did.
686 - thinks CIAS’s vote on her is more likely townie than scummy
(jpei takes over leadership)
707 - argues that jpei’s claim is truthful, but could be either Town or Scum
713, 735 - fluff
736 - Thinks jpei’s extension of the day is scummy attempt to ferret out more power roles.
743 “Almost every jpei post to this thread has been self-defense. I think I’ve shown that you can defend yourself and still discuss other things that end up helping Town.” but worries that jpei could extend day indefinitely if people were voting him/her.
744 - thinks Boozy goes too far in thinking jpei is Town.
747 - concedes to Jimmy’s argument that jpei’s play while bad is probably not scum
754 - fluff
765 - (to boozy’s softclaim) “Was that really necessary?”
771 - accuses boozy of courting suicide by scum
786, 797, 798 - fluff
813 - (to boozy): "Are you trying to get yourself (night)killed? "
873 - "I’m really surprised Bill hasn’t been by to roleclaim yet. "
877 - expresses dismay that what was a vote on Bill for a bad vote by him has turned into Lynch the Lurker.
878 - "Also, it should be end-of-Day by now…should we still be talking? "
END DAY 1
898Chronos: “So, Drain Bead, why did you think that Bill even had a role to claim, per post 873?” - Drain: “Vanilla Town is still a role.”
900 “The vig thing was so thoroughly debunked after I brought it up that I’m surprised there was a second push for it.”
914 - call’s USCDiver’s post (which Tom Scud quoted) a smudge.
921 - “I thought it was a smudge because he said there were things that bothered him, but didn’t bother stating what the things were”
922 - on whether peeker should say who he’s protecting: "It also, provided peeker says he protected someone other than himself, may clue the scum into whether or not he can. "
941 likes substantive Night posts; wonders if that means scum can Day talk.
END NIGHT 1
Day/night 1 notes:
The whole business with the lie detectors has been gone over multiple times; I think it’s a fair reading of her initial post that it took a negative view towards the enterprise, and that the bit about how “if we do this claim, we ALL need to do it” reads like an afterthought. I’m not sure why Drain thought it would be so difficult to get everyone to claim; though it can be maddeningly difficult to round up a Town and get the players to each do something moderately difficult (like put down a vote with a reason by some time well short of day’s end), getting them to do something easy like type “I am Town” really isn’t a problem.
I think Drain took too much heat for the quoted statement in 395. While of course we would like for the scum and PFKs to spend all their time killing each other off, if we find a person engaged in behavior that could only be a scum looking for other scum teams & third parties, we should certainly lynch that person asap, because, you know, they are scum. I disagree with Drain’s assessment of how the lie detector thing could have been used to find third-parties et cetera, but I think that IF that was what Chronos was doing, it would have been sound to lynch him for it. (On the other hand, this isn’t the argument Drain herself made in 602)
The trial-by-vig idea definitely looks anti-Town now, considering what we know about peeker and about the scum roleblocker; it would have looked anti-Town at the time to a scum, who would have already known enough to take advantage. To her credit, DB dropped the idea quickly and also argued against it when it was revived.
The jump on the OreDigger wagon could plausibly have been a scum attempt to get a new wagon rolling (in collaboration with Jimmy and taking advantage of poor innocent Me); it could also be a townie looking for a plausible vote (of which there were few available at the time) and also influenced by OMGUS.
The Bill vote made the second wagon DB had jumped on early and directly after Jimmy gave it a push; it does seem unlikely that 2 scum would have coordinated that closely. But then, “never say scum would never do that”.
In general, DB was very damn touchy about people voting on her or declaring her suspicious; witness her reaction to my quote of the USCDiver post.
I quoted 878 instead of marking it as fluff because it shows DB was thinking about night talk / day talk issues. Her insight of 941 definitely had a pro-Town effect; it strikes me as plausible that she decided to do it to help reduce the pressure on her (after all, it would be much easier for a scum to make the “intuitive leap”). I think her 878 gives more support to the idea of this being a genuine Townie insight.
Tom?
BEGIN DAY 2
964 - Notes Gryff’s tiara and vote. Notes Jimmy’s votes don’t give much info, and that he stood up for her earlier.
985 - pointed out that Jimmy had poked at Chronos several times; also that her and Jimmy’s votes had been closely entwined. Elects Boozy and asks him to state his reasons for wanting a peeker lynch.
1003 - says as daytalking scum she had set up scum fight first day. speculates about Jimmy-Chronos scum fight.
1007 - fluff
url=“http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=11640198&postcount=1022”]1022 - Normal Phase asks: “Given this morning’s revelations, Drain Bead, you feel like offering any reason why I shouldn’t just vote you again?”
1032 - asks if Gryff’s claim was really necessary; asks Normal Phase why NP expected DB to be dead overnight [Tom says - wtf??]; also thinks joined-at-the-hip with Jimmy voting record is point in her favor; also: "I know Scum and probably a few Town will be pushing for my mislynch at some point "
1034 - queries Alka re USCDiver vote for leader.
1035 - “I compare your situation more to OAOW than jpei. I don’t think OAOW should have claimed that early, and ditto for you.”
Normal Phase post attacking DB on various points, particularly "Don’t tell me “Scum wouldn’t do that.” " re joined-at-the-hip voting. Also "Are you seriously insinuating that anyone voting for you is likely to be Scum? "
[url=“http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=11641574&postcount=1059”]1059 To Normal re: why she thought maybe Normal was surprised to see her alive: “I wasn’t sure what you were talking about, so I figured I’d cover all possible bases in one post.” accuses Normal of two misrepresentations: "you’re once again claiming that I had some sort of problem with the alignment claim suggestion other than “everyone needs to do it.” "; “The other one is that you claim that Jimmy voted based on “lynch the lurker,” when it was clearly due to BillMC’s vote based on faulty logic.” says she loathes LtL. Also: "Chances are in the Day discussion, they said “Hey, we’ve got a vanilla here, let’s try to derail this wagon and see if we can focus on a juicier target.” And it sure did work (we ended up losing jpei and potentially outing peeker if he is who he says he is), with the side effect of casting suspicion on me if Jimmy happened to die before I did. " Also, "Nope, [not claiming anyone voting for her was Scum], hence why I said that both Scum and Town would be joining in on my lynch when it happens. "
1061 asks Tom Scud what post # the “scum can normally only talk at night” post was; points out that she had the insight that led to the discovery that scum could day-talk.
1065 - fluff
1105 “The one thing that bothered me the most about [the bandwagon against her] then was the fact that it started based on a couple of people saying that I had some sort of problem with personally claiming my alignment. This was never the case, and was something I probably could have averted simply by claiming that I was Town-aligned in the first post I made on the subject, because by the time I got back to the thread, I already had a couple of votes on me for not claiming when I clearly said in the post that I thought everyone should claim for claiming to have any worth at all. But really, we’ve gone over that. My issue now is with anyone who continued to spout that bit of misinformation after I corrected it. Right now I can only recall Normal Phase doing it, but there may be others, and once I get some time (probably Sunday or Monday) that’ll be one of the things I look at.”
1108 - argues in favor of a possible peeker/Jimmy scum fight being set up in advance.
1109 - “NETA: Keep in mind that this post was purely playing Devil’s Advocate on my part–I’m still torn on what to think of peeker personally.”
1137 - volunteers to test Doily, if Gryff doesn’t want to give it to Scuba
1155 - “I wonder if the fact that there was a scum cop in a game this size is a point in favor of the existence of a third party”
1160 - thinks shiny stuff being stolen also points to third party
1187 - Makes case for Daphne based on serial bandwagon-jumping; votes Daphne
1214 comments on what berynium is, based on in-game evidence.
1227 - pings Daphne on protecting peeker
1253 - is unsure (post Daphne claim) whether to unvote her. Also: “If DaphneBlack is a Scum Roleblocker instead of Town, and we find that out, do we then lynch peeker?”
1254 - fluff
1271 - fluffish (next 2 days will have limited time)
1285 - “The only reason a scum roleblocker would NOT have blocked peeker last night is if peeker is also scum. If Daphne is outed as scum, I think we’ve essentially found two for the price of one.”
1287 - NETA.
1304Comments on peeker roleblock claim: scum might have blocked but not killed peeker hoping for a vig or lynch; also “I see that you said you were blocked. This means that either Daphne is telling the truth and we have a Town and Scum blocker, and the Scum blocked you but didn’t kill you (hoping that if you were blocking jpei their kill could get through, and if you were self-blocking that the Vig may take you out anyway), and she blocked Freudian. Or Daphne is lying, she is Scum and may have blocked a Townie you and said she was blocking the person who hasn’t posted in the thread all day and will probably be unable to confirm whether or not she was blocked. Or a Scum Daphne really did block Freudian because she knows you’re Scum and you are now saying you were blocked in order to try to save your Scummy ass once Daphne bites it and is revealed. The explanation of what happened if Daphne is Town is starting to be much more complicated than the alternatives.”
1305 - argues with peeker about texcat theory.
1313 - more back and forth with peeker about texcat
1316 - still more back and forth with peeker
1318 - notes to world at large that peeker’s texcat theory makes no sense
1321 - notes to Tom Scud that peeker’s theory makes no sense
1323 - asks mods to pm ping Freudian
1327 - calls peeker on his OMGUS vote
1344 - objects to Daphne block idea on grounds that scum could night-kill her (Drain)
1352 - continues to object to Daphne block idea; also raises possibility that she won’t get a block message even if she is blocked. Asks Daphne for more info about her investigative powers and results on FS.
1365 - Normal: “Drain Bead, why do you keep bringing up the idea of Scum killing you, or pushing your lynch? Scum has no motive I can think of to want you dead, if you are Town.” Drain: “My thinking was that if Daphne pops up Scum, I become a lot closer to confirmed Town, which will make me a very likely target to be killed. If Daphne comes up Town, everyone will want me dead.”
(Alka claims)
1367 unvotes Daphne; votes Boozy
1388 discusses possibility of alka/boozy being a scum setup; notes she had been pinged by alka; on why she’s worried scum will try to lynch her (to NP): “Well, clearly I think that Scum will be trying to get me lynched–I’m an easy target and I’m Town.”
1398 Normal Phase votes Drain Bead, with quotes and case
1399 - “Normal, FWIW I don’t get those who defended me on the basis that I didn’t get bussed either. Shit, it’s what I asked for–why would Scum jump on me at that point? There was no benefit for anyone, Town or Scum, to vote for me after that point. I had the votes to be lynched.” also “I’ve already addressed the rest of what you’ve said as best I could.” also affects zen indifference to being lynched.
1404 (to peeker) “Discussing your protection strategy in any more detail than the above is probably not the best idea.”
1405 NETA
1427[Daphne should spill her FS information] Especially since FS has several votes on her now. If she’s Town and you can save her, that would be swell.
1429 revotes Daphne pending info re: FS, but thinks Thing Fish case has merit.
1430 NETA
1437 expresses frustration about FS no-show. Speculates whether a Daphne block will be visible to a vanilla town. Asks Daphne if she knows if a block will be visible. [Daphne had already answered “no” 5 posts before]
1449 wonders where Thing Fish defense is - even if scum, should have had a chance to come up with something on scum board
1450 complains about day end timing
(Thing Fish claims)
1455 (to Thing Fish) "Sorry, I didn’t mean that as a smudge, I actually thought it was a bit of a point in your favor. "
1464 “I’m not sure what to think of the fact that Thing Fish self-protected last Night.”… “I do agree with the point that Thing Fish should have claimed much earlier after the leader voted.”
1465 asks for vote count
1467 “Since I think that one of the insane references was mine, I would like to make clear that I was not breadcrumbing anything. I really was just calling peeker crazy.”
1480 clarifies when Thing Fish said he self-protected (to peeker)
(full Thing Fish “bodyguard” claim)
1494 asks Daphne to block her
END DAY 2.
1541 "That sucked. Once he came out with the Bodyguard title and mechanics, I found his claim completely believable, but with at least three unchangeable votes (Boozy, the sleeping Guiri, and his own) there really wasn’t any way to save him at that point.
I think the Politician is probably anti-Town."
1579 " I thought my case against Daphne was more solid than my case against Chronos at that point, and had actually planned to revisit [the case against Chronos] in the Morning."
1580 NETA
BEGIN DAY 3
1627 confirms Daphne block, elects Daphne.
1630 argues Daphne should elect self
1632 again, argues Daphne should self-elect
1641 “The existence of a Town Roleblocker makes me lean toward SK rather than Vig, too. It seems a little pointless to have a Town Roleblocker when there’s only one anti-Town killer out there.”
1648 on Daphne results on FS: “I thought Daphne already said she found out nothing. Which is sort of in line with my theory that VTs are the most likely to go AWOL early on in a thread.”
1657 un-elects Daphne, elects Alka since Tom is not at all confirmed.
1665 again volunteers to test doily
1666 votes Chronos for lack of strategic vote, questioning Daphne’s confirmedness
1668 accuses Chronos of playing it too safe with his votes.
1672 more on Chronos’s Daphne post. Also:
"By the time you voted, I think it was pretty clear that Thing Fish was Town, and that the majority of the voters for him were going to be absent for the rest of the Day. Because you were present, you had the power to potentially save him. A tough situation, but you could have easily explained your vote at that point as strategic, just as you explained your vote on OAOW as policy-based and not necessarily because you thought he was the Scummiest. Clearly you don’t necessarily have a problem with voting for someone slightly less scummy for policy reasons on Day One, but you DO have a problem with voting for someone slightly less scummy on Day Two in order to potentially save a very strong Town power role. "
1693 no offense at Tom Scud suspicion; promises to look at Daphne wagon
1701 speculates on Daphne color
1728 fluff
1746 To Tom Scud, on his proposed WoW: "I’ll try not to post too much so you can catch up. 
"
And catch up I have.
Day 2 and 3 notes:
1105 badly mischaracterizes the votes for DB; only ColdPhoenix, who promptly unvoted once he was pointed to the right post, actually voted for DB for failing to personally claim (Freudian voted for no stated reason whatsoever); some of the other votes, including amrussell’s and Normal’s, cited a “reluctance to claim” in their one-sentence summary reason, but clearly were much more directed at DB’s discouragement of the lie detector claim idea in whole. Nor did Normal Phase state in her post at 1022 that DB had personally failed to claim or been reluctant to claim; rather that she had attempted to discourage the whole idea.
The last sentence in 1304 does not seem to follow; all of those scenarios, all of which involve multiple moving parts, seem pretty complicated to me. I don’t think it’s much of a stretch at all to think Scum might have expected/hoped for a vig or a lynch to take care of peeker for them.
I’m not sure why DB spent so much time arguing with peeker about his TexCat theory; it was utterly irrelevant to his claim & his claim to have been blocked, as he could not have been expected to know any of this anyway if his claim were true.
Townie cred to Drain for asking the mods to pm FS.
On the other hand, Drain was also posting after the later, full Thing Fish claim, and was clearly aware of the FS ultra-lurk. I will have to see what she says in her day 3 case against Chronos.
And oh, look, votes for Chronos on day 3 cite “failure to strategically vote” and gosh, look at the paragraph asserting that “By the time you voted, I think it was pretty clear that Thing Fish was Town, and that the majority of the voters for him were going to be absent for the rest of the Day. Because you were present, you had the power to potentially save him.”
I think I have a new vote for today.
unvote Chronos
vote Drain Bead for not strategically voting to save Thing Fish; for massive hypocrisy in voting Chronos on the same case; for misrepresenting the cases being made against you on Day 1, and again misrepresenting Normal Phase for her case on Day 2; and oh, yeah, because Jimmy came to your rescue on Day 1.
NETA2: Especially when that person is voting for the person whose ass he’s claiming is about to be saved.
Had to put that one in 2 parts because I hit the board’s upper limit for post length.
Also, I trust that my cryptic remark is now explained.
No, it’s really not. Why do you care about saving Chronos?
Just feeling a bit giddy after combing through to find that case. Scum.
The sad thing is that if you’re Town, and I die toDay, it basically signed your death warrant too.
If you’re Scum, I’d gladly trade my vanilla ass for you and Chronos.