SDMB All-pro fantasy football league 2013

It has been a rough fantasy season for me all the way around but this team is particularly frustrating. My primary issue right now is terribly awful decision making. I don’t really reliability at WR and it is starting to show. Bowe has been wildly inconsistent and I with Blackmon back, I expect Shorts to drop off soon. That really only leaves me with all WR3s to pick up the slack, so I will need to start making some pickups. Brady has been pretty middle of the road but he has been consistent so I am okay with that. Forte has been a beast so I am very happy about that. Especially since Morris has been performing about as well as the Redskins.

Hopefully, I can use the momentum of last week to dig myself out of the bottom.

This league is being weird this year. I know it’s early, but the Isotopes are strong contenders for the SenorBeef Award - finishing at or near the bottom with the top or near the top total points. He went against the top offense this week (me!), the 2nd best offense last week, and just put up a terrible effort in Week 2 (76 pts, compared to his 186(!) in Week 1). That’s always a bummer - but I’m not going to feel sorry for him and his late 3rd round Peyton Manning.

In other news, my offense seems to have figured something out. My 2nd overall Calvin Johnson pick hasn’t completely panned out quite yet, but forming this team around Reggie Bush and Jimmy Graham sure has. Of course, I’m a Bush injury away from really hurting, so I’ll just put all these eggs back in the basket reaaaaaaal carefully…

Looks like the game is stuck, as it’s still showing the Texans-49ers game in the 4th quarter with 14:16 left, while NFL.com has the game over. Gonna be a close finish between me and Pancakes mostly because I didn’t know James Starks of GB was out. Oops. :frowning:

Damn. No more kvetching for me… at least until next week. Had three starters and my #1 backup all on bye. Rolled into Sunday with, I kid you not, Brian Hartline and Brent Celek as starters against Tom Brady and the SF Defense and came out ahead. A classic “Why do I put myself through this?” kind of week.

Sometimes it’s just better to be lucky than good - week 7 in a nutshell for me. Almost felt bad for Last Place, but then I got better and figured that winning big or winning ugly is just about the same thing.

So this week is me and Chitwood, both at full strength. On paper it looks like a pretty even matchup. He’s got Fitzgerald going against the Seattle D and I think I’m going to sit CJ this week against San Francisco. This may be the week I truly regret not bidding more for Julius Thomas after Week 1.

Luck and Rivers are on the block if anyone is interested. Let me know.

Not that anyone in this league actually needs a QB… not with the number of quarterbacks currently rostered.

All I need for tonight is for Eli Manning to get his head out of his ass, and pretend that no other receiver or running back exists on the field except for Victor Cruz. About 200 yards receiving and four touchdowns would do the trick…yeah, right. :frowning:

All I have to say is that if the Minnesota defense outscores Kyle Rudolph by 55 points, SenorBeef will have secured the SenorBeef title for me. And that will make me angry.

There’s always a chance with Eli.

And it figures, I wasted the only week where Ryan Mathews has ever done well.

Wish we would’ve made our new W/R slot a W/R/T slot now that I have Cameron/Gronk. Maybe next year.

I played in a PPR league that awarded 0.5 to W/R but a full 1.0 per catch to tight ends. It made getting one of the top 2 or 3 guys pretty important and made guys like Fauria or Rudolph, whose value is contingent on touchdowns, pretty irrelevant.

Which is weird, because I have both Fauria and Rudolph in this league, as backups when Graham went out!

I’m feeling a little bit more confident about my decision to take Megatron at #2

I was going back through the league history - what a bizarre league! My first year was 2010, when I went 3-10, but somehow finished 8th. The winner was the Isotopes, who finished the regular season 6-7! Looking at the draft, it looks like SenorBeef traded up in the 2nd round - how did that happen? Did we allow pick trades then?

And with the scoring and roster changes over the years, it’s hard to compare all time records and things. I think that’s one of the reasons I typically oppose change in fantasy leagues, but I think the changes we’ve made have certainly been for the better.

Bizarre league indeed, usually it’s the guys in last place who stop setting their lineup.

I’m in the market for a QB better than Matt Ryan. He’s a serviceable QB by any stretch, but I’m looking for that final push. I have a lot of solid parts to offer in return - but this is probably a deal more suited for someone who needs help in 2 or 3 areas. Calvin Johnson and Graham are off the table, however.

(And seriously, if someone could explain to me why I left Matthew Stafford on the board when I took Ryan, I’d appreciate it. Was it all the week 9 byes I already had on my team? Had Stafford been on an injury report that week? Something? Anything?)

I’m looking to trade Jordan Cameron, #2 overall scoring TE. Straight up for a WR, RB, or QB, or I Can package him with Newton for one of the best QBs, Keenan Allen/Marvin Jones/Terrance Williams or Arian Foster/Ryan Mathews/Mike James for one of the best WRs or RBs. I’ve got Gronk too and I can’t start them both, so any good offer will be taken.

I want to reiterate/clarify some of the procedural stuff we do in the leagues I run.

We do commissioner approval trading. Practically speaking, we’re all trusted, competent players here, and no one is going to deliberately tank or pass their good players to someone else or do any of the things that a default league has a voting veto system for. Generally, all trades are approved as soon as I see them. In the event that there was a funky trade, I’d bring it up for discussion in the league page. Fast tracking trades has obvious benefits. Under a 48 hour trade window, trades for the games on Sunday have to be made at a corresponding time early Friday afternoon. So you have less time to negotiate and work out trades, and you also have less up to date information about potential injuries and such, which often play a factor in why you’re making that trade in the first place. Approval trading means you could make a trade right up until the start of the game, giving more time to negotiate and the most up to date information.

By default, I approve all trades as soon as I see them. However, this could potentially provide difficult edge cases close to gametime. Occasionally someone will want to agree to a trade before the games, but not actually want the trade to go through until after the games. So by default, I will not immediately process trades that occur less than 24 hours before a game that one of the players is involved in. I say 24 rather than 48 because I feel that anything more than 24 is sufficient time to manage your roster, and make your intentions known if you hadn’t intended the trade to go through. So if you want a last day trade to go through, both players should come to the thread and post their intention for the trade to go through immediately.

In such a case, it’s possible that I may not immediately approve the trade (if I’m not here), or perhaps I approve it 4 hours later, but one of the trading players is unavailable to adjust their roster after the trade processed. This is unlikely but possible, especially if someone agreed to a trade sunday morning. If this happens, then simply have both people come to the thread and state their intentions. Give specific intentions like “When this trade goes through, I want to bench player X and replace him in that slot with player Y from the trade”. If people don’t post on the thread whether they intend for a trade to go through or not, trades will be processed ASAP more than 24 hours before the game, and with less than 24 hours to go, not fast tracked.

I know this sounds a little complicated with the caveats, but it really isn’t. The system has been working fine for us, provides a ton of flexibility, and rarely gets tested with edge cases. If you just let your intentions specifically and clearly be known, everything will be fine.

Another thing, sort of related. I will honor specific intentions regarding gametime injury decisions in the event that you can’t make it to the computer before the game starts. It has to be clear and specific “If X is active, I want him to start in my RB spot, benching Y” - it has to be an active/inactive thing, “starting” is too ambiguous. I think we’ve done this all of twice in several years, but I wanted to let people know the rule is there if they want to use it.

Something else. We set these leagues to have the latest possible trade deadline in the year (this year it happens to be Nov 29), but when I copied the settings from last year to this year, it didn’t automatically adjust the trade deadline, but rather put it at the default. I just noticed this now. So I’m changing the trade deadline in all my leagues to be the 29th, as was originally intended.

Any questions?

Well, crap. My first sub-100 point performance was disappointing, but mainly because of the situation in Denver. Welker had a terrible matchup against Flowers, and was just manhandled - to the point of sustaining a concussion. And with the departure of John Fox on the sideline, it looks as if Knowshon Moreno may be losing snaps to Montee Ball. I have roster depth, especially with Harvin getting back into the mix, but I’m worried that I’ll be left with a lot of toss-up decisions to make in the playoffs - and I ALWAYS screw those up.

So if anyone wants to bet a number of my players in return for an upgrade somewhere, I’m open to a 2:1 trade.