So, proof it. Unless you proof it, you cannot be certain.
I do not need proof – I believe in my facts. No matter what you tell me – I will be correct.
Encore, the political strawman. Politics, again politics. But the evidences against your ideas, they have no thing to do with politics, they are about genetic coherence. You are starting from the sole assumption that your race ideas are correct and all things then tie into them.
There is no position that the races are “biologically equivalent” (encore a phrase that has little clear sense in the argument), this is your and 84 invention all out of the very evident political obsessions you have, that has nothing to do with the genetic evidence presented.
The position that has been supported here is the archaic concept of the races that you are taking straight from Gobineau of the 19e century is nonsense in the face of the genetic evidence, the evidence of actual distributions of the alleles of genes.
Not crime rates or very badly informed historical ideas. Genes.
Sure, I’m right! There is no doubt!
Sure, who wants to be repentantly called: You fucking-idiotic-moron!!! Ah, that would be: YOU!
I have not found credible statistics for Senegal. According to The CIA World Factbook, the population of Morocco is 99 percent Arab-Berber, which is to say white.
In Egypt 99 percent are called “Egyptian,” but there is no racial break down.
I do not care if those comments are allowed in The BBQ Pit or not. They reveal bad things about you.
No you have not. You keep asserting this off of ridiculous proofs like a for-profit company selling ancenstries research to Americans (these same kind of companies sell Americans proofs they are descended from the greatest european nobility and other things that they will pay for).
Of course the ability to trace line of descent does not in any way say that your race is a valid genetic grouping that has significant co-variations.
You assert this again and again based on nothing more than the ad hoc collections of statistics and the asserted relationships while ignoring any statistics or facts that contradict and make nonsense of your claims, as in the crime rates (which are simply nonsense to compare between countries as you do, but let us accept your idiocy for the purpose of the argument).
No in fact they do not, as if it was the case of these differences being strongly associated with your races, it should be that the variations should be strongly clear where black americans descend from europeans or let us take the case of Jamiaca which has had a large input of Chinese genes because of the imported labour under the British rule, and the Chinese married greatly into the black population. By your logics, Jamaica having great White and Chinese genetic inputs it should be the best island of the Caraibe islands for crime and other indicators.
Of course we know there will be some again ad hoc explanation.
No, the burden of proof is to prove that your foundational concept actually has a genetic sense, then there is a necessity to prove and not to assume that crime (how is it even defined, it is a cultural and social phenonema that varies, it is even incredible to assume genetics explanations for a concept so vague) has a genetical basis. Etc.
Your argument is nothing but a series of the ad hoc assumptions and assertions to prove what you want to conclude. The logic shows no scientific train and no proofs, only the assumptions and the assertions based on what your uneducated and hateful person wants to be the case.
Ever wondered if your family tradition about having an American Indian ancestor was true? Are you really a direct descendent of Ivan the Terrible, or was your grant-grandpa just senile?
Well, wonder no more. Several companies are now providing tests that can trace your ancestry. We have has the mitochondrial (mother to mother to mother) and Y chromosome tests (father to father to father) for a few years, but vendors are now going beyond the “tail” tests to include probabilities of racial groups, based on empirical data and the human genome.
http://www.dba-oracle.com/fun_dna_testing_racial_groups.htm
Just as calling Africans “savages”, and insisting that Barack Obama’s intelligence must come from his white ancestry rathern than his black ancestry, reveals bad things about you. Your hatred of black people is pretty obvious when the real NDD shines through.
Your vile racism and accusations of cannibalism reveal profoundly bad things about you.
Many Berbers are “black”. Genetic analysisshows that NW Africa (Morocco and Algeria) shares more ancestry in common with Sahal countries like Burkina Faso and Mali then with Europe or even with Arab countries.
You mean you have not found a way to avoid the statistics from the same sourcing as you have used.
Ahahahahhhhhhhahaha.
Incredible, magnificent in the stupidity of the reply.
No, the Berberes as we have already shown you are not all white. And the genetics - not the names of ethnic groups that I already know you have no knowledge at all about, do not tell you their genetic ancentries. Arabe, Berbere, they say nothing about ancestry you type of low cretin.
Just to show a simple map for you: File:Y Hap EM-81.PNG - Wikipedia
I am happy to see once again the proof that you read not a single citation that is provided to you, since I have already given links earlier to actual genetics
The Sahara Desert was more of a barrier to genetic communication than the Mediterranean Sea.
These are photographs of Berbers. The great majority of them look Caucasion.
I note that once again you’re ignoring actual genetic evidence in favor of your feelings.
The Sahara desert has not been around forever, and has not been as large as it is now for long at all. Until about 5000 years ago, much of it was quite habitable. And there has been “genetic communication” up and down each coast of Africa for thousands of years, unhindered by deserts.
So a google image search, with your opinions on how they look, trumps actual genetic evidence? Do you realize how absurd you sound?
Key point of your quote is:
No they don’t.
But feel free to count yourself to the group of people I would call: You fucking-idiotic-moron!!!
So we’ve finished talking about genetics and have moved on to appearances. So is your claim that if someone looks white that they are white?
Those Berbers all look to me like feckin foreigners – your argument is invalid. I saw no white people whatsoever.
For all I know, they have two legs, two arms, have sex with each other, sleep and defecate – those are all things, which I as a white person don’t have in common with them.
Lol, then by your own reasoning, there’s “no arguing with you.”
Lol, I have no idea what your point is here.
Anyway, you posted a definition of “racism.” NDD reasonably interpreted it at a strawman argument. When he did so, you implied that he had misinterpreted you, but you refused to actually explain what your point was. i.e. you are hiding your position behind a cloak of ambiguity.
Wrong- NDD had explicitly said things (about inferiority and superiority) that were contained in the definition.
You sound absurd to anyone not inclined to make excuses for blacks.