Liberals are so desperate for any evidence that the races are biologically equivalent that they will emphasize anything that seems to give evidence of intrinsic equality, while ignoring the overwhelming amount of evidence that points in the opposite direction.
I have never said that crime, stupidity, and illegitimacy are specific to any one race. Suggesting that I have is an illustration of the straw man fallacy, that I have already described.
You have zero evidence. Every point you’ve brought up in this thread has either been to show the existence of an achievement gap (which we don’t deny) or just failed.
Occasionally you’ve let flashes of the “real” NDD shine through- like calling blacks “savages” who spread their “savagery” throughout the world. Where did the hate come from? What happened to you, or someone close to you? Were you or someone close to you attacked? Your own experiences are at the heart of your opinions- obviously not the facts (which show nothing but the achievement gap).
He didn’t say you did. But you have said that one race is inferior, and others superior.
Once again I ask: why does the achievement gap persist?
I do not run from the description of “racist” but I want to make it clear what I do believe. I am neither an Ashkenazi Jew nor an Oriental, but I believe that the Ashkenazi and Oriental sub races are superior to what I am racially, which is a Nordic Gentile.
I answered this twice: here and here.
Relevant portions:
And I’ll quote myself again because I think it’s extremely relevant:
High rates of black crime do indeed shape the way I feel about the Negro race. This is true for most people who have had much experience with Negroes. For example, this is what Jesse Jackson has said:
There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved… After all we have been through. Just to think we can’t walk down our own streets, how humiliating.
Remarks at a meeting of Operation PUSH in Chicago (27 November 1993). Quoted in “Crime: New Frontier - Jesse Jackson Calls It Top Civil-Rights Issue” by Mary A. Johnson, 29 November 1993, Chicago Sun-Times (ellipsis in original). Partially quoted in US News & World Report (10 March 1996)
According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, when it comes to murder rates, “In 2005, offending rates for blacks were more than 7 times higher than the rates for whites.”
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm
I think that is appalling. I think whites have the right to be angry about it.
I Quoted the definition of: racism
Nothing more, nothing less.
If you don’t like the definition, take it up with the Oxford Dictionary: Here
What was your point in doing so?
The header of your cite writes:** Homicide Trends in the U.S.**
In Ireland 99% of the homicides are commited by WHITE people. So your argument is nil-and-void.
I see nothing wrong with the definition at all. I also think the fear of being called a racist has interfered with the dialogue on race liberals claim to be in favor of.
Please tell us more about your personal experience with “Negroes”. What was the most profound experience you’ve had?
“Liberals”?
You’re really stretching here. And you just claimed you didn’t go in for personal insults. Only “facts and logical reasoning”, eh? Shame you contradicted yourself within minutes. But not surprising, given the evidence of this very thread.
It’s not about ignoring “overwhelming amount of evidence”. There’s NO GENETIC evidence. If you want to posit a genetic basis for a difference, you have to show there’s even a correlation genetically. I
know you’ve been told this multiple times and even given a definition of what constitutes genetic evidence. It’s hardly our failure if you don’t like that definition and can’t provide any evidence that fits it.
You are not able to follow anything I can come up with as an explanation anyhow… so why should I waste my time?
I already pointed out, that there is no point in arguing with you - since you believe you are right.
Conclusion: It doesn’t matter what brilliant argument and/or fact I can come up. So, why waste my time.
Simply said: You are a ignorant-moronic–idiotic-racist retard
Do you need me to be more clear?
I document my factual assertions. You have not documented that.
According to Irish Crime Statistic the murder rate in Ireland per 100,000 inhabitants is .96.
According to Crime in the United States 2010 the corresponding rate in the United States is 4.8.
According to the CIA World Factbook, the black population in Ireland is 1.1 percent.
I am virtually certain that in Ireland blacks have a much higher crime rate than whites, but I will change my opinion if you can quote credible statistics that demonstrate otherwise.
Can you show me an example of that? TIA
Do you believe you are right?
Not really, since I have no interest in engaging with people who hide behind ambiguous statements.
It is more honest to write that you know nothing of the subject. It is very funny to talk about crime statistics before the concept existed.
Except its stagnation and the decline into savage warfare between the competing barons of course. The Warlord era and the degeneracy of the opium period, why they must be proofs of Chinese inferiority. And the fact that Han did not rule China from the Qing, it is again the obvious genetical proof of Han inferiority.
It is evident, I know of no facts at all that are genetic that contradict this hypothesis that I have just created.
It is well noted that you return to your utilisation of the word Negroes which you sadly tried to justify to refer to Bantu, except we saw it had no sense in it. Now we can take it as the expression simple of your racism.
Yes, it has been presented many times here, you disgusting relic of backward and primitive tribalistic thinking.
Ah, and he finally he is forced to address but he asserts.
Except the low crime of the Senegal? Morocco and Egypt that both have very large “negroe” poplations and should by your primitive logic be high crime?
Yes, we keep seeing him avoid the data points that do not serve his primitive and archaic argument.
Burden of Proof is a fallacy in which the burden of proof is placed on the wrong side. Another version occurs when a lack of evidence for side A is taken to be evidence for side B in cases in which the burden of proof actually rests on side B. A common name for this is an Appeal to Ignorance. This sort of reasoning typically has the following form:
Claim X is presented by side A and the burden of proof actually rests on side B.
Side B claims that X is false because there is no proof for X.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/burden-of-proof.html
I have already demonstrated that race is a legitimate and meaningful way of classifying human beings that can be easily determined by DNA tests, that the races differ significantly in average intelligence, and crime, and that these differences are durable. In other words, the differences behave as though they are genetic.
The burden of proof is on those who maintain that the differences are not genetic.
Boy, your wrongness continues. I’ve already demonstrated how your “races” are NOT, scientifically speaking, a legitimate and meaningful way of classifying human beings. Your “races” are as legitimate as “four-legged creatures” is for classifying animals.
As to your burden of proof- we’re not even making a claim. We’re just pointing out how your claim has no evidence supporting it. You’ve shown nothing but the existence of an achievement gap. Yes, African Americans have lower test scores (in general, though the gap may be shrinking) and high crime rates (this gap also may be shrinking) then other Americans. There are many possible explanations as to why, including yours. Your explanation has zero evidence- and it fails in its predictive ability (because within African Americans, percentage of African [or Negro] ancestry has no correlation with lower test scores or higher crime).
You have zero evidence. Your races are not scientific. Your hatred and disdain for black people is clear, and is clearly the source for your opinions.